brush border still attached to the epithelium with
intact epithelial cells and an inflammatory cell also
appear to be reduced. Tubular dilation in some
regions was still found with protein cast in the lumen,
but in small amounts when compared to the U7 and
U14 groups.
The tubular injury score results in the five sample
groups found that the U7 and U14 groups had a higher
tubular injury score compared to tubular injury scores
in the SO group. Simultaneously, tubular injury
scores in the UC7 and UC14 groups who received
chlorogenic acid were lower than those in the tubular
injury scores in the U7 and U14 groups who did not
get chlorogenic acid. This result shows that the UUO
model could cause a tubular injury that ends with
renal fibrosis. Kidney fibrosis occurs due to
obstruction, which causes an increased in intratubular
pressure and vasoconstriction in the kidneys, thus
ending with tissue ischemia. Also, in this study, it was
found that chlorogenic acid administration in the
UUO model can inhibit tubular injury, thereby
preventing renal fibrosis.
Statistical analysis results showed that there were
significant differences in tubular injury scores in the
U7 group (2,73±0,7) and U14 (3,77±0,18) compared
to the tubular injury scores in the SO (0) group. This
result shows that UUO was able to induce tubular
injury, which could end with renal fibrosis.
Comparison of tubular injury scores between the UC7
groups (1,33±0,15) and UC14 (1,32±0,29) showed a
significant difference compared to tubular injury
scores in the U7 and U14 groups. Tubular injury
scores indicated this result in the UC7 and UC14
groups given lower chlorogenic acid than tubular
injury scores in the U7 and U14 groups who were not
given chlorogenic acid.
4 DISCUSSION
In this study, it was found that chlorogenic acid had
roles in preventing tubular injury in laboratory UUO
mice to prevent renal fibrosis. This phenomenon
could be seen because the tubular injury score in
laboratory mice given chlorogenic acid was lower
than the tubular injury score in laboratory mice that
were not given chlorogenic acid.
According to the result, it was found that
unilateral ureter ligation in experimental animals
could cause kidney tubular injury, which resulted in
renal fibrosis. UUO method created a higher degree
of obstruction because ligation of one ureter caused a
total obstruction, increasing intratubular pressure and
causing secondary vasocontriction to the kidney,
leading to decreased GFR and tissue ischemia. This
condition caused further damage to kidney tubules so
that most tubular epithelial cells would undergo
apoptosis, resulting in atrophy (Ucero et al., 2013).
In this study, the tubular injury score was higher
in U7 and U14 groups which received UUO than in
SO group. An increased tubular injury score was
observed in exeperimental animals with longer UUO
(Tateishi et al., 2015). This result showed that UUO
was a representative model to create renal fibrosis
(Ucero et al., 2013). Other studies also explained
tubular injury caused by UUO by providing an
overview of tubular damage, tubular epithelial cells
apoptosis, fibrosis, and interstitial inflammation.
Increasing cell death could be seen in day-3 to day-14
after UUO, and specific histologic marker of chronic
kidney disease could be obtained after 1-2 weeks of
UUO. Cell death was started by an increased
hydrostatic tubular pressure accompanied by
increased free radical reactions and oxidative injuries
in proximal tubules (Xu et al., 2013). Moreover, the
tubular injury score was significantly higher in UC7
and UC14 groups which underwent UUO than in SO
group. Therefore, further study about the roles of
chlorogenic acid to tubular injury should be
conducted.
In this study, the tubular injury score was lower
in UUO groups, UC7 and UC14, which were given
chlorogenic acid than in UUO groups, U7 and U14,
which were not given chlorogenic acid. This result is
consistent with the previous study, which stated that
there were decreased tubular necrosis, intraluminal
cast, and tubular dilatation in laboratory mice given
chlorogenic acid (Domitrović et al., 2014). The
decrease in tubular injury score in groups given
chlorogenic acid was due to antioxidant, anti-
inflammatory, antibacterial, and anticarcinogenic
properties of chlorogenic acid (Naveed et al., 2018;
Tajik et al., 2017).
The limitation in this study is that it has not
investigated the role of chlorogenic acid in renal
fibrosis on epithelial cell markers and mesenchymal
cell markers that affect the occurrence of tubular
injury, therefore further research is needed in this
regard.
5 CONCLUSION
Tubular injury score in the UUO mice model given
chlorogenic acid was lower than the UUO mice
model without chlorogenic acid. Further research can
be sharpened by researching the role of chlorogenic
acid in the tubular injury and the analysis of the role