brush  border  still  attached  to  the  epithelium  with 
intact epithelial cells and an  inflammatory cell also 
appear  to  be  reduced.  Tubular  dilation  in  some 
regions was still found with protein cast in the lumen, 
but in small amounts when compared to the U7 and 
U14 groups. 
The tubular injury score results in the five sample 
groups found that the U7 and U14 groups had a higher 
tubular injury score compared to tubular injury scores 
in  the  SO  group.  Simultaneously,  tubular  injury 
scores  in  the  UC7  and  UC14  groups  who  received 
chlorogenic acid were lower than those in the tubular 
injury scores in the U7 and U14 groups who did not 
get chlorogenic acid. This result shows that the UUO 
model  could  cause  a  tubular  injury  that  ends  with 
renal  fibrosis.  Kidney  fibrosis  occurs  due  to 
obstruction, which causes an increased in intratubular 
pressure  and  vasoconstriction  in  the  kidneys,  thus 
ending with tissue ischemia. Also, in this study, it was 
found  that  chlorogenic  acid  administration  in  the 
UUO  model  can  inhibit  tubular  injury,  thereby 
preventing renal fibrosis. 
Statistical analysis results showed that there were 
significant differences in tubular injury scores in the 
U7 group (2,73±0,7) and U14 (3,77±0,18) compared 
to the tubular injury scores in the SO (0) group. This 
result  shows  that  UUO  was  able  to  induce  tubular 
injury,  which  could  end  with  renal  fibrosis. 
Comparison of tubular injury scores between the UC7 
groups (1,33±0,15) and UC14 (1,32±0,29) showed a 
significant  difference  compared  to  tubular  injury 
scores  in  the  U7  and  U14  groups.  Tubular  injury 
scores  indicated  this  result  in  the  UC7  and  UC14 
groups  given  lower  chlorogenic  acid  than  tubular 
injury scores in the U7 and U14 groups who were not 
given chlorogenic acid.
 
4  DISCUSSION 
In this study, it was found that chlorogenic acid had 
roles in preventing tubular injury in laboratory UUO 
mice  to  prevent  renal  fibrosis.  This  phenomenon 
could  be  seen  because  the  tubular  injury  score  in 
laboratory  mice  given  chlorogenic  acid  was  lower 
than the tubular injury score in laboratory mice that 
were not given chlorogenic acid.  
According  to  the  result,  it  was  found  that 
unilateral  ureter  ligation  in  experimental  animals 
could cause kidney tubular injury, which resulted in 
renal fibrosis. UUO method created a higher degree 
of obstruction because ligation of one ureter caused a 
total obstruction, increasing intratubular pressure and 
causing  secondary  vasocontriction  to  the  kidney, 
leading to decreased GFR and tissue ischemia. This 
condition caused further damage to kidney tubules so 
that  most  tubular  epithelial  cells  would  undergo 
apoptosis, resulting in atrophy (Ucero et al., 2013). 
In this study, the tubular injury score was higher 
in U7 and U14 groups which received UUO than in 
SO  group.  An  increased  tubular  injury  score  was 
observed in exeperimental animals with longer UUO 
(Tateishi et al., 2015). This result showed that UUO 
was  a  representative  model  to  create  renal  fibrosis  
(Ucero  et al.,  2013).  Other  studies  also  explained 
tubular  injury  caused  by  UUO  by  providing  an 
overview of tubular damage, tubular epithelial cells 
apoptosis,  fibrosis,  and  interstitial  inflammation. 
Increasing cell death could be seen in day-3 to day-14 
after UUO, and specific histologic marker of chronic 
kidney disease could be obtained after 1-2 weeks of 
UUO.  Cell  death  was  started  by  an  increased 
hydrostatic  tubular  pressure  accompanied  by 
increased free radical reactions and oxidative injuries 
in proximal tubules (Xu et al., 2013). Moreover, the 
tubular injury score was significantly higher in UC7 
and UC14 groups which underwent  UUO than in SO 
group.  Therefore,  further  study  about  the  roles  of 
chlorogenic  acid  to  tubular  injury  should  be 
conducted. 
In this study,  the tubular injury score was lower 
in UUO groups, UC7 and UC14, which were given 
chlorogenic acid than in UUO groups, U7 and U14, 
which were not given chlorogenic acid. This result is 
consistent with the previous study, which stated that 
there  were  decreased  tubular  necrosis,  intraluminal 
cast, and tubular dilatation in laboratory mice given 
chlorogenic  acid  (Domitrović  et al.,  2014).  The 
decrease  in  tubular  injury  score  in  groups  given 
chlorogenic  acid  was  due  to  antioxidant,  anti-
inflammatory,  antibacterial,  and  anticarcinogenic 
properties of chlorogenic acid (Naveed et al., 2018; 
Tajik et al., 2017). 
The  limitation  in  this  study  is  that  it  has  not 
investigated  the  role  of  chlorogenic  acid  in  renal 
fibrosis on epithelial cell markers and mesenchymal 
cell  markers  that  affect  the  occurrence  of  tubular 
injury,  therefore  further  research  is  needed  in  this 
regard. 
5  CONCLUSION 
Tubular injury score in the UUO mice model given 
chlorogenic  acid  was  lower  than  the  UUO  mice 
model without chlorogenic acid. Further research can 
be sharpened by researching the role of chlorogenic 
acid in the tubular injury and the analysis of the role