rapidly with an increasing wavelength. Moreover, the
development of a system is much easier if the
wavelength is visible.
In order to have the system components available
for very low price at good performance we have
chosen a 660 nm LED from OSRAM (GH
CSSRM2.24). It is an important wavelength for
horticulture and is therefore readily available. In
order to be able to alter the driving current and to have
low noise at the same time, we used a Keithley
Sourcemeter as a current source for the laboratory
setup.
The beam shaping was done with a single 25 mm
diameter plastic aspheric lenses from Edmund Optics.
Depending on the desired beam characteristics, the
focal length was chosen at a range between 25 mm
and 75 mm (e.g. f40 #66-024). In order to avoid a
wavelength shift, a custom made 2 nm FWHM filter
from Chroma was used. The polarization was
controlled with a 1:9000 polarizer from Edmund
Optics (#85-919).
The prism is made of Schott F2 glass and has P4
polished surfaces to provide best performance.
By altering the position and the focal length of the
collimation lens, the divergence of the light can be
altered. If the SPR system is built with a light source
with low or no divergence a camera can be used even
without objective lenses.
The suitable camera should be chosen depending
on the demands, concerning refractive index unit
(RIU) resolution, system price and volume. The
ximea MU9PM-MH with its APTINA
MT9P031sensor is offering a 12 bit resolution at a
low price and very low volume (15 x 15 x 8 mm)
while the PCO Edge 4.2 is offering an outstanding
resolution of 16 bit. The PCO Edge with its 16 bit is
providing a high RIU resolution and the large chip
size is enabling an acquisition of a large SPR-Image
without the use of a lens. Between these two cameras,
there are many different cameras, which could be
used. Currently, a good compromise between costs,
size and bit resolution are cameras with a Sony
IMX178 sensor like the ISG Allegro.
4 RESULTS
Figure 2 shows the comparison of an LED light
source (left) and a laser light source (right). Both are
providing a “TopHat like” beam profile. In case of the
laser, a very small area at the centre of the Gaussian
beam profile was cut out. This Process is generating
diffraction pattern at the edge of the lenses which
were used to cut out the centre part. Furthermore, the
edges of the prism and microfluidics as well as air
bubbles and dust are generating diffraction patterns.
The result is a very noisy illumination which could be
sufficient for single or multi-channel measurement
with very large regions of interest (ROI) but it is
totally insufficient for high resolution SPR imaging.
Figure 4: False colour SPR image made with a laser based
light source and a Ximea CMV4000 10 bit camera; left:
diffraction patterns originating from edges, dust particles
and air bubbles are visible; right: cross-section along the
black line from the left side, the noise which is originating
from diffraction is clear to see
Figure 4 shows a SPR image which was recorded
with a laser based light source. The cross-section,
which was taken along the direction of the black line
shows that there is tremendous noise which is
lowering the RIU resolution of the SPR imaging
system. To avoid this kind of noise a LED based light
source was developed. LED’s do not have spatial
coherence, therefore they do not generate diffraction
patterns.
Figure 5: False colour SPR image, made with a LED light
source and a ISG allegro 14 bit camera; left: the SPR active
area is illuminated homogeneous, red areas are the sealing
and a air bubble; right: cross section along the the direction
of the black line, the cross section shows the SPR curve
which is originating from the divergent illumination.
Figure 5 shows a SPR image, which was recorded
with a LED based light source. The cross-section,