Table 3: The results of the Markov. (cont.) 
Year.Month Rank Probability 
2020.4 
A 
0.153153 
B  0.386359 
C  0.225048 
D  0.23544 
2020.5 
A 
0.16573 
B  0.394502 
C  0.226987 
D  0.212781 
N month 
(steady state) 
A 
0.172996 
B  0.387838 
C  0.22255 
D  0.216617 
5.4  Prediction Result Analysis 
Through the analysis of the above table, it can be seen 
that February 2020 presents A polarized form, and the 
probability of economic vitality growth rate grade A 
is' 0.428571 ', while the probability of economic 
vitality growth rate grade D is' 0.571429 '.This shows 
that according to the historical data of the last four 
years, January 2020 is in the trough of cyclical 
fluctuations in the growth rate of economic vitality. 
Therefore, based on the historical data, it is 
predicted that the possibility of a continuous decline 
in the economic vitality growth rate in '2020.2' is' 
0.408571 '. This is because of the particularity of the 
Chinese year cycle, and there is such a long holiday 
as the Spring Festival in China. In Holiday people 
will reduce a variety of normal economic activities; 
The date of the Spring Festival is determined by the 
lunar calendar, which usually falls in January or 
February. So this form of polarization makes sense, 
and it fits the reality. 
6  INSIGHTS ADVICE TO THE 
GOVERNMENT 
Markov forecast allows us to have a comprehensive 
grasp of the future economic situation, so that the 
government can adjust economic policies in time. For 
the current Markov results, Shanghai, as China's 
economic center city, has maintained a stable growth 
of economic vitality. In some months, such as the 
months of Chinese Spring Festival, we can clearly see 
that the economic vitality reaches a local maximum.  
But in the long run, it is more and more difficult 
to maintain high economic vitality with the increase 
of economic volume. At present, China's economic 
growth is slowing down. As a prior indicator of 
economic development, economic vitality can 
effectively show the current and future economic 
level of a region. 
This paper suggests that the government can use 
the following methods to maintain economic vitality: 
Carrying out industrial reform, using welfare fiscal 
policies, improving the level of international opening-
up, speeding up the regional integration development 
strategy and forming regional growth poles. 
7 FUTURE WORK 
Due to the current situation of COVID-19 
pneumonia, China's economy and even the world 
economy have been disrupted by the sudden 
epidemic. In the context of blocking cities, reducing 
international exchanges and suppressing 
agglomeration, the economy has suffered huge losses. 
The next work can assess the economic loss of the 
epidemic through the economic vitality determined in 
this paper, and provide theoretical support for the 
economic recovery. 
REFERENCES 
Kraay, A. (2018). Methodology for a World Bank human 
capital index. The World Bank.  
Yang, Z., & Pan, Y. (2020). Are cities losing their vitality? 
Exploring human capital in Chinese cities. Habitat 
International, 96, 102104. 
Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of 
educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. 
Journal of development economics, 104, 184-198. 
Martyniuk-Peczek, J., Parteka, T., & Peczek, G. (2016). 
Territorial Aspects of Entrepreneurial Activity in Polish 
Suburban Zones. Procedia engineering, 161, 1639-
1646. 
Lou haimiao, & sun qiubi. (2005). Evaluation of economic 
vitality of Chinese provinces based on factor analysis. 
Journal of fuzhou university (philosophy and social 
sciences) (03), 33-36. 
Lu xiaoli, & guo wanshan. (2007). Comprehensive 
evaluation index system of urban economic vitality. 
Statistics and decision-making, 2007 (11), 77-78. 
Sun faping, ma hongbo, & wang lanying. Research on 
strengthening economic vitality of qinghai. Qinghai 
ethnic studies (3), 92-98. 
Jin yan-jie. Evaluation of urban economic vitality in China. 
Geography science (1), 11-18. 
Hou rongtao. Construction of economic vitality evaluation 
system and empirical analysis of futian district [J]. 
Economist (6) : 148-150.