7 DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION
We expected to see an effect of blogging activity –
mainly because this activity is directly related to the
course objectives, but also through other, more
indirect mechanisms. For instance; the course was
about management information systems (i.e., IT) – a
reasonable expectation would be that students with a
particular interest in this topic would be more active
bloggers, and also get better grades in the course than
expected based on high school grades or average
grades.
However, no such effect can be detected, not even
among the sub-sample of very active bloggers. Our
research questions were:
Are there any group of students that experience
higher grades as a result of using blogging as an
educational tool?
Does higher activity on a blog network lead to
higher grades?
The results show that the answer is no to both
questions.
This is interesting for several reasons. While
previous literature (for instance Farmer et al, 2008)
indicate that blogging is perceived useful by students,
our study suggests that this not necessarily translates
into better «hard» results as measured by course
grades. We believe this is a useful observation
throughout much of the literature on pedagogical
methods – tools that are perceived to be motivational
and effective by students and/or instructors are not
necessarily the same tools that improve learning as
measured by exam results. This does not imply that
tools and methods which “only” improve student (or
teacher!) motivation or perceived learning without
significantly improving grades should be
discouraged. Increased motivation and course
satisfaction are goals on their own, and of course,
experimenting with different methods in different
settings is also valuable on its own. However, a
clearer definition of what qualifies as «successful»
when using new pedagogical tools could probably be
useful.
Another interesting point is how we measure
learning –in this case, how the exam is structured. The
exam type remained unchanged as blogging was
introduced. A possible objection would be that the
exam should be changed to better reflect the methods
used in the course, or that blogging per se not should
be expected to improve exam results when the skill
set required in a traditional written exam probably is
different from the skill set required for (and promoted
by) blogging.
Finally, it is worth reflecting on how different
practices appeal to different groups of students. In our
case, blogging seemed to appeal to younger students
more than older students, and to female students more
than male students. Of course, this could be good or
bad, but nevertheless worth considering and
measuring when possible.
REFERENCES
Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education.
Studies in higher education, 21(1), 93-108.
Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M.-
T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on
high school students’ engagement and learning about
genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A
developmental theory for higher education. Journal of
college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.
Berners-Lee, T., Dimitroyannis, D., Mallinckrodt, A. J., &
McKay, S. (1994). World Wide Web. Computers in
Physics, 8(3), 298-299.
Blood, R. (2000). Weblogs: A history and perspective.
Rebecca’s pocket, 7(9), 2000.
Ellison, N., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A
preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact
on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia
and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99-122.
Farmer, B., Yue, A., & Brooks, C. (2008). Using blogging
for higher order learning in large cohort university
teaching: A case study. Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology, 24(2).
Freeman, W., & Brett, C. (2012). Prompting authentic
blogging practice in an online graduate course.
Computers & Education, 59(3), 1032-1041.
Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). To blog
or not to blog: Student perceptions of blog effectiveness
for learning in a college-level course. The Internet and
Higher Education, 13(4), 206-213.
Heiberger, G., & Harper, R. (2008). Have you Facebooked
Astin lately? Using technology to increase student
involvement. New directions for student services,
2008(124), 19-35.
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of
Twitter on college student engagement and grades.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-
132.
Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G.
(2009). An empirically grounded framework to guide
blogging in higher education. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, 25(1), 31-42.
Kiliç, E., & Gökdas, I. (2014). Learning through Blogging:
Use of Blogs to Enhance the Perceived Learning of Pre-
Service ICT Teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory
and Practice, 14(3), 1169-1177.
King, S. O., & Robinson, C. L. (2009). ‘Pretty Lights’ and
Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing