![](bg7.png)
Gervais, W. M. and Norenzayan, A. (2012). Ana-
lytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science,
336(6080):493–496.
Ghosh, S., Rath, M., and Shah, C. (2018). Searching as
learning: Exploring search behavior and learning out-
comes in learning-related tasks. In CHIIR ’18.
Kaplan, A. M. and Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world,
unite! the challenges and opportunities of social me-
dia. Business horizons, 53(1):59–68.
Kelly, S., Truong, M., Shahbaz, A., Earp, M., and White,
J. (2017). Freedom on the net 2017: Manipulating
social media to undermine democracy. freedom of the
net project.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., and
Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age:
A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbully-
ing research among youth. Psychological bulletin,
140(4):1073.
Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., and Hertwig, R. (2019).
Citizens versus the internet: Confronting digital chal-
lenges with cognitive tools. PsyArXiv.
Krathwohl, D. R. and Anderson, L. W. (2009). A taxonomy
for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of
Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Long-
man.
Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: from find-
ing to understanding. Communications of the ACM,
49(4):41–46.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S.,
and Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algo-
rithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society,
3(2):2053951716679679.
Norris, P. and Epstein, S. (2011). An experiential think-
ing style: Its facets and relations with objective and
subjective criterion measures. Journal of personality,
79(5):1043–1080.
Pang, B., Lee, L., et al. (2008). Opinion mining and senti-
ment analysis. Foundations and Trends
R
in Informa-
tion Retrieval, 2(1–2):1–135.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is
hiding from you. Penguin UK.
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J.,
and Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style
predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition,
123(3):335–346.
Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., and Koehler, D. J. (2015).
Everyday consequences of analytic thinking. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6):425–432.
Pennycook, G. and Rand, D. G. (2018). Who falls for fake
news? the roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming,
familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of person-
ality.
Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., and Shaalan, K. (2017).
Mining social media text: extracting knowledge from
facebook. International Journal of Computing and
Digital Systems, 6(02):73–81.
Song, H. and Schwarz, N. (2008). Fluency and the de-
tection of misleading questions: Low processing flu-
ency attenuates the moses illusion. Social Cognition,
26(6):791–799.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). # Republic: Divided democracy in
the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., and Furn-
ham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in
conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3):572–585.
Taibi, D., Fulantelli, G., Basteris, L., Rosso, G., and Pu-
via, E. (2020). How do search engines shape reality?
preliminary insights from a learning experience. In
Popescu, E., Hao, T., Hsu, T.-C., Xie, H., Temperini,
M., and Chen, W., editors, Emerging Technologies for
Education, pages 370–377, Cham. Springer Interna-
tional Publishing.
Taibi, D., Fulantelli, G., Marenzi, I., Nejdl, W., Rogers,
R., and Ijaz, A. (2017). Sar-web: A semantic web
tool to support search as learning practices and cross-
language results on the web. In 2017 IEEE 17th In-
ternational Conference on Advanced Learning Tech-
nologies (ICALT), pages 522–524.
Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social
theory of the media. Stanford University Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond facebook
and google: Emergent challenges of computational
agency. Colo. Tech. LJ, 13:203.
van Dam, J.-W. and Van De Velden, M. (2015). Online
profiling and clustering of facebook users. Decision
Support Systems, 70:60–72.
Zarsky, T. (2016). The trouble with algorithmic decisions:
An analytic road map to examine efficiency and fair-
ness in automated and opaque decision making. Sci-
ence, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1):118–132.
Facing the Appeal of Social Networks: Methodologies and Tools to Support Students towards a Critical Use of the Web
573