Legal Regulation Problems by using Highly Automated Vehicles
R. R. Magizov
a
, L. M. Gabsalikhova
b
, T. A. Nikolaev
c
and V. G. Mavrin
d
Kazan Federal University, Suyumbike Avenue, 10A, Naberezhnue Chelny, Russia
Keywords: Highly Automated Vehicles, Legal Regulation.
Abstract: The application of new technologies in the design of modern cars has gradually led to the automation of
various control processes. Today, the legal systems of different countries are faced with the problem of
regulating the use of highly automated road transport. Such a vehicle may fulfill part of the functions of the
driver or even, potentially, replace it completely. Different approaches to the problem of regulation give rise
to different solutions. The presented article is devoted to the problems of legal regulation of the operation of
highly automated cars. The problems of terminology are touched on, approaches to legal regulation in this
area in different states are described. It is concluded that currently in Russia the legal basis for the use of
unmanned vehicles has not yet been fully formed and there are a number of issues that need to be regulated.
Based on the study, the author formulates proposals for amendments and additions to the legislation of the
Russian Federation related to the operation of highly automated cars.
1 INTRODUCTION
The main trend in the development of the economy
and society, which is currently associated with the
rational and rational management and development of
all areas of activity, including the automotive
industry, is intellectualization. The high level of
motorization and globalization of the markets force
automakers to search for new solutions and to
constantly improve both the design of the car and the
production technology. The automotive industry is
undergoing significant changes: the largest car
manufacturers, together with IT developers, are
moving towards the creation of vehicles with the
possibility of fully autonomous driving.
Automation and digitalization are actively
entering our lives; changes are caused by the
introduction of many technological innovations used
in various industries. Innovative developments of a
modern navigation system for the autopilot of mobile
ground objects can find application both in the
military and civil sectors of our country - in freight
and passenger transportation by rail and road.
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-0371
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-3285
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-2278
d
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6681-5489
In 2014, during the beginning of the development
of “automation of driving systems”, the International
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) published
the concept of “level of autonomy”. SAE standards
have been set and accepted for use by state regulatory
authorities, world leaders in car manufacturers,
engineers, and investors. The standards describe six
levels of automation.
In September 2016, the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) established its
formal classification system - the SAE standard. The
distribution of the six “levels of autonomy” is as
follows: the “0” level is supposed to include a car that
is under the complete control and constant control of
a person, and the “5” level will mark absolutely well-
functioning automation. The introduced concept of
“autonomous driving” allows the vehicle to
comfortably, and most importantly, safely move
along public roads without human intervention, and
thanks to self-driving technologies implemented in
the car: an on-board computer and system sensors,
with which it is possible to control the car instead of
the driver in certain conditions.
Magizov, R., Gabsalikhova, L., Nikolaev, T. and Mavrin, V.
Legal Regulation Problems by using Highly Automated Vehicles.
DOI: 10.5220/0009825305990605
In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems (VEHITS 2020), pages 599-605
ISBN: 978-989-758-419-0
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
599
Figure 1: Autonomous vehicle market dynamics by automation levels.
The process of digitalization and automation
today affects almost all countries of the world. At the
same time, each country determines its development
priorities. To assess the readiness of countries for the
emergence and implementation of autonomous
vehicles, KPMG International has been conducting
research since 2018. According to studies by the
Netherlands, Singapore and Norway, the United
States is on the top line. Russia is located in 22 of the
25 countries studied. The Netherlands is actively
collaborating with neighboring countries on a project
to introduce unmanned technology in the freight
segment. Authorities are adopting new laws to
address safety issues and legal regulation of the
autonomous vehicle market. The law governing the
experimental use of autonomous unmanned vehicles
(Nieuwe wet maakt…, 2017) was approved by the
House of Representatives of the Netherlands in April
2018 and finally approved by the country's Senate in
September 2018.
Of course, the lack of proper legal regulation of
the operation of unmanned vehicles can negate all its
advantages. As for Russia, unfortunately, despite the
limited timelines for introducing autonomous
transport, our country has made less progress than
others in developing legislation in the field of
unmanned vehicle operation. At the moment, the
scope of unmanned transport is regulated exclusively
by bylaws. There is no regulation at the legislative
level, as a result, uncertainties and contradictions
remain, which are a barrier to the further development
and implementation of technology. Legislative issues
are today one of the key obstacles to an effective
solution to the problem of creating unmanned
vehicles, both in Russia and around the world.
2 THE SOCIAL FACTORS ROLE
BY TRANSITION TO
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
Assessing possible changes in the transport system
during the transition to autonomous cars, analysts
evaluated, first of all, the opportunities that the
economy and society receive. This is first of all:
- the liberation of man from the routine task of
driving vehicles;
- reduction in the number of emergencies due to
the human factor. Perhaps this is an overly optimistic
forecast, since autopilot robots will make their
mistakes typical of robots;
- improving the economy of vehicle use due to
fuel economy, the possibility of round-the-clock use
of technology, autonomous vehicles consume less
fuel compared to vehicles with a driver, which helps
to reduce harmful emissions in exhaust gases
(Kouchak, M., Gaffar, A., 2017). The results of the
iMLTrans 2020 - Special Session on Intelligent Mobility, Logistics and Transport
600
study (Pourabdollah M. et.al., 2017) show that semi-
autonomous vehicles can reduce average fuel
consumption by up to 5.3% depending on the driving
situation and speed.
However, in most cases, positive effects have a
downside. Thus, the benefit can lead to losses: for
example, the most obvious fact is that by removing
the “human factor” from the car control system, we
create social tension by reducing the number of
people involved in the transportation of drivers. In
addition, the advantage, designated as “the ability to
do some business during the trip”, according to
doctors, can lead to an increase in ailments due to
motion sickness. To avoid this, technical solutions
that can be expensive are needed (Vine, S.L. et.al.,
2015)
Consumers still have mixed feelings about
autonomous vehicles. A HNTB survey (Autonomous
vehicle knowledge…, 2019) showed that among all
respondents, the vast majority (91%) believe that
autonomous vehicles should have a person on board
who can cancel automation in an emergency.
Confidentiality issues related to data obtained from
autonomous vehicles were identified by 63% of
respondents.
The safety of the vehicles themselves and data
security are highly valued by consumers, people need
confidence that the technology is trustworthy.
The article (Bisht, M. et.al, 2017) provides a
critical analysis of the modern social dilemma of
autonomous vehicles. The article raises questions
regarding their impact on our society and, in turn, the
impact of society on these funds. When a person
controls a vehicle, he feels comfortable in driving
these tech cars. The control problem also covers
problems arising from the possibility of hacking cars,
which is associated with security.
The introduction of autonomous vehicles is
fraught with a number of problems that need to be
addressed, and these are, first of all, the issues of
optimal cost, social tension, safety, legislative
regulation so that people can be sure of these vehicles
and that they are protected (Makarova et al., 2019).
3 FACTORS, THAT LIMIT TO
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
LEGAL REGULATION
The introduction of autonomous vehicles affects not
only the road transport sector. Definitely, the
consequences will affect the sphere of legislation,
insurance and other related industries related to the
functioning of autonomous vehicles.
Among the main problems of the legal regulation
of autonomous vehicles, the absence of a unified
terminology in Russia can be distinguished. To
describe the same vehicles with the functions of
automating the control process, quite different terms
are often used: autonomous vehicles, unmanned
vehicles, connected vehicles, transport robots, etc.
Legislative documents should take into account
the vehicles autonomy levels, since this determines
the person's participating possibility in driving and,
accordingly, his responsibility.
The lack of a common terminology is the main
obstacle in the process of legal regulation that hinders
the use of autonomous transport.
There is no doubt that in order to avoid the
uncontrolled consequences of the widespread
introduction of such funds in our lives, it is necessary
to develop appropriate legislation. Of particular
importance is the regulation of artificial intelligence
systems used in transport.
In addition, for the successful development of the
direction of unmanned transport technologies in the
near future it is necessary to solve the issues of
admitting cars with the autopilot function to public
roads, and also to determine the responsibility for
possible accidents involving them.
A number of countries have already made an
attempt to legislatively regulate issues related to the
production of highly automated and unmanned
vehicles, their operation and liability for damage. So,
at the National Conference of Commissioners for the
Unification of the Law of the United States on
October 26 - 28, 2018, a draft Act on Highly
Automated Vehicles was developed. The draft Act
introduces significant changes to the sections on the
registration of automated vehicles and automated
driving operators. Also in the United States, the
Automated Driving Systems Safety Concept 2.0 Act
is in force (Automated Driving Systems 2.0…, 2017),
which defines 12 safety criteria for the operation of
highly automated cars. At present, these provisions
are advisory, but there is no doubt that legislative
reinforcement of such criteria is required.
In Canada, new rules have been adopted for
unmanned aerial vehicles. These rules are
amendments to the applicable legal regulation for
remotely controlled aircraft in Canada. The rules
were developed by the Department of Transportation
of Canada and relate to unmanned aerial vehicles
(UAVs), which weigh from 250 g to 25 kg and are
controlled within the direct line of sight of the pilot
(Antonova N.V. et.al, 2019).
Legal Regulation Problems by using Highly Automated Vehicles
601
Regarding unmanned aerial vehicles, legislative
changes have occurred in Russia. So, on March 30,
2016, Law No. 462-FZ “On Amendments to the Air
Code of the Russian Federation regarding the use of
unmanned aircraft” (On Amendments…, 2016)
entered into force in the text of the Law the concept
of “unmanned aircraft system”, "unmanned aerial
vehicle". According to paragraphs 5 - 6 of Art. 32 of
the Air Code of the Russian Federation of March 19,
1997 No. 60- FL the definition of “unmanned
aircraft” is fixed (Air Code of the Russian
Federation…, 1997).
Of interest is the experience of the European
Union (EU), where a roadmap is being developed for
the deployment of vehicles with a high degree of
automation in the EU. The GEAR2030 roadmap
(competitive and sustainable growth of the European
Union's automotive industry until 2030) focuses on
three areas: adapting the production chain to new
global challenges; automated and related vehicles;
trade, international harmonization and global
competitiveness (Gaysin S.V. et.al, 2017)
Belgium already has a Code of Practice for
Testing Unmanned Vehicles (Autonomous vehicles.
Code…, 2016), which defines the concept of an
automated vehicle and enshrines the concept of a
fully automated vehicle. Germany adopted the
Unmanned Vehicles Act of June 20, 2017.
Russia was no exception. Manufacturers for a
long time had problems with testing a new type of
transport on the roads due to the unresolved issue. To
eliminate the legal gap, an order was adopted by the
Government of the Russian Federation (On approval
of the action plan…, 2018), which approved a
roadmap to improve legislation and remove
administrative barriers in the field of automobile
transport "AutoNet". The document lists 75 measures
to improve the regulatory legal framework necessary
for the introduction of new technologies, goods and
services in the markets of electric, unmanned and
connected cars, transport logistics, intellectual urban
mobility, as well as telematics, transport and other
information systems.
At the moment, automated vehicle control
technologies remain non-standardized, this must be
done taking into account international and national
standards of technologically advanced countries.
The key issue remains the presence or absence of
a driver in the cab. For example, the Traffic Rules in
force in the Russian Federation (On the Rules of the
Road, 2019), based on the Vienna Convention on
Road Traffic of 1968 (Vienna Convention…, 1999),
or the Charter of Road Transport and Urban Ground
Electric Transport (Charter of road transport…,
2007), do not directly allow the delegation of driver
functions to automatic control systems and do not
imply the possibility of a driver missing from the
vehicle. It should be noted that the amendments to the
Vienna Convention in 2014 were not taken into
account by the Russian legislator.
The infrastructure necessary for the operation of
this kind of transport is only being created.
At the same time, the current trend in the
legislation of economically developed countries is the
responsibility on the driver for driving a vehicle even
with a relatively high degree of automation, which
implies the duty of the driver to maintain control over
the road situation and over the vehicle. Moreover, the
absence of a driver in a vehicle creates legal
uncertainties that require resolution both in
international treaties and in national legislation
(Gaysin S.V. et.al, 2017)
As part of the implementation of the AutoNet
roadmap, the Decree of the Government of the
Russian Federation of November 26, 2018 No. 1415
“On the experiment on the pilot operation of highly
automated vehicles on public roads” (On the
experiment on the pilot…, 2018) from December 1,
2018 was prepared March 1, 2022 in the territory of
Moscow and Tatarstan. The Ordinance refers to a
“highly automated vehicle” in the cabin of which
there is an insurance driver who does not intervene in
driving. Definitions were also given to such concepts
as automated control mode, automated driving
system, owner and driver of a highly automated
vehicle, in addition, the participants in the experiment
and the order of participation were determined. It is
important that the applicant, in order to participate in
the experiment, must insure and maintain the risk of
liability for obligations arising from damage to life,
health or property of other persons to third parties in
the amount of 10 million rubles for each highly
automated vehicle during the period of operation.
Obviously, at this stage, as in situations related to
the ordinary driver, completely emergency situations
cannot be avoided. Several tragic cases involving
autonomous transport are already known. So, during
the Moral Machine experiment, the opinions of more
than 2 million people from more than 150 countries
of the world were collected on what moral principles
self-driving cars should be guided in emergency
situations when it is impossible to avoid human
casualties and you need to choose the lesser of evils.
The study showed that it would not be easy to develop
a universal “moral law” for self-governing machines
(Antonova N.V. et.al, 2019).
On July 17, 2018 Yandex signed an agreement
with the Moscow authorities on the development of
iMLTrans 2020 - Special Session on Intelligent Mobility, Logistics and Transport
602
unmanned vehicles in the city, which was a kind of
soil for the development of the draft resolution. It is
interesting that Yandex has already conducted tests
on public roads: as early as the beginning of 2018, the
car ran through the streets of Moscow. The driver was
in the driver's seat, but did not touch the steering
wheel. However, later it became known that the
traffic police did not allow testing in Moscow. In
October 2018, Yandex also launched a service on the
territory of the Skolkovo Techno-park to call an
unmanned vehicle through the “Yandex.Taxi”
application.
Many countries are already ahead of us, not only
technologically, but also because of the rapid
response to regulatory needs. So, in Japan at the end
of 2018. unmanned passenger buses were tested in the
field. Of course, it is necessary to proceed from the
realities of the readiness of roads for the exit of such
vehicles in order to avoid casualties. So, even the US
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) has banned the use of unmanned school
buses to transport children, the tests of which were
recently launched by the American company
Transdev.
A variety of transport robots are also courier
robots, as they are designed to move goods. Estonia
stepped forward in the legislative definition of this
type of transport robots (Estonian Act on
amendments…, 2017). Obviously, like any vehicle,
courier robots must be safe. The Law discloses this
criterion through requirements for road safety,
provides for one more specific requirement - the
obligation to provide a “black box” to authorized
bodies in the circumstances established by law.
Robots with similar functions exist in other national
jurisdictions (for example, in the USA), but they are
defined in different terms. For example, Virginia uses
the term “electric personal delivery device” (Crespo
Alexander P., 2017).
The problem of regulation of unmanned vehicles
and automated driving is also discussed at the
international level. So, from March 19 to March 23,
2018, a session of the working group on traffic safety
WP1 of the UN Inland Transport Committee was held
in Geneva. The session discussed the wording of the
resolution on the regulation of highly automated
transport, the basic principles and approaches to
regulation, as well as the main definitions in this area.
Already in September, a Resolution (Resolution on
the implementation…, 2019) was adopted on the
implementation of highly and fully automated
vehicles in traffic conditions of the United Nations
Economic Commission for Europe's Global Road
Safety Forum, which outlines a number of
recommendations for users of high-altitude
automated driving systems - and fully automated
vehicles.
It should be noted the absence at the international
level of a universal international treaty regulating
legal, social and ethical issues in the field of artificial
intelligence and unmanned vehicles. At the same
time, the dominant trends include the maintenance of
proper ethical standards, which are based on
fundamental rights and values, including privacy and
the protection of personal data, as well as the
prohibition on the production and use of autonomous
weapons systems. Certain aspects of the issue under
consideration are regulated in the framework of the
existing multilateral international treaties (Vienna
Convention …, 1999, Convention on the Law…,
1971). Within the framework of the activities of the
International Organization for Standardization (CO),
under the auspices of the UN, the conceptual
apparatus of robotization has been developed, a
classification has been presented, according to which
industrial and service robots are distinguished.
Currently, the European Union is one of the key
jurisdictions in which the regulation of robotics,
artificial intelligence and cyber-physical systems is
most fully developed. At the EU level, a number of
legal studies on this issue have already been carried
out. There are draft regulatory acts. Developed and
successfully implemented concepts for the
development of the studied industries, including from
a legal point of view.
Within the EU, “the Horizon 2020” program is
operating, which is the largest research and
innovation program in the EU.
The Strategic Research Program (SRA) includes
two related documents: The Strategic Research
Program for Robotics in Europe until 2020 and the
European Robotics Roadmap.
The European Union adopted Resolution
2015/2103 (INL) “Civil Law on Robotics” dated
February 16, 2017. The document outlines the
prospects for regulating liability for damage that may
be caused by robots, a definition of the concept of
"robot" is proposed, and it is also proposed to form a
system of bodies on issues of robotics and artificial
intelligence, aspects of creating a registration system
for robots, the basic framework for developing ethical
codes of manufacturers and determining the legal
status of a robot in (Tikhomirov Yu.A. et.al., 2018).
In 2018, the European Declaration on
Cooperation in the Field of Artificial Intelligence was
adopted, which defines the main directions for the
development of this field, in particular, increasing the
level of information security, ensuring security in the
Legal Regulation Problems by using Highly Automated Vehicles
603
process of developing and using artificial
intelligence, as well as increasing the accountability
of artificial intelligence systems (EU Declaration…,
2018)
Summarizing the above, we can conclude that
international regulation in the field of unmanned
vehicles is at an initial stage. Perhaps due to the fact
that there is currently no consensus among the
international community on the regulation of the legal
status of unmanned vehicles, it is impossible to sign
any international agreement. Consequently, it is more
efficient to use the law of recommendation, which
will allow us to model the normative orientation, as
for the legislation. It is not binding on the legislature
and serves as a normative-orientating standard for
them. The creation of uniform model acts serves as a
means of unification and harmonization of
legislation.
It is possible for the Russian Federation to initiate
a model law within the framework of the Inter-
Parliamentary Assembly of the CIS member states.
The main property of model acts is that they are a
kind of bridge between the norms of international and
domestic law. Model laws directly absorb the
principles and norms of international law, translating
them in a normatively concentrated form into national
legislative acts. They are characterized by a
recommendatory nature, which does not exclude
peremptory norms recognized as voluntary
commitments.
Another vector of necessary regulation is the
determination of the procedure for resolving issues
arising from tort. In the event of the establishment of
a collective liability regime for causing damage to an
unmanned vehicle, reference must be made to the
relevant provisions of civil law on the collective
responsibility of persons responsible for the actions
of an unmanned vehicle, as well as fixing the
peremptory procedure for applying this rule.
4 CONCLUSIONS
As the study showed, the legislation governing the
use of highly automated vehicles is at the initial stage
of its formation. Moreover, national regulation is
rather fragmented, international as such is absent and
lags behind national.
Despite the widespread introduction in the near
future of highly automated vehicles at the
international level, a universal international treaty has
not been adopted that regulates legal, social and
ethical issues in the field of artificial intelligence and
unmanned vehicles. To date, not a single act or
technical document (standards) has been adopted
only in the field of control and operation of unmanned
vehicles.
Currently, in the Russian Federation, the sphere of
unmanned transport is regulated exclusively by by-
laws. There is no regulation at the legislative level, as
a result, uncertainties and contradictions remain,
which are a barrier to the further development and
implementation of technology.
It seems that the next necessary step in the
normative legal regulation of the operation of highly
automated vehicles following the Decree of the
Government of the Russian Federation of November
26, 2018 No. 1415 should be the development and
adoption of an appropriate federal law reflecting its
scope, enshrining the basic concepts, legal
foundations, powers of state bodies authorities,
requirements for the use of vehicles equipped with an
automatic control system, requirements for
automobile public horns, federal state control in the
use of vehicles equipped with an automatic control
system.
Of course, the adoption of a basic federal law will
entail the need to make additions to certain regulatory
acts of the federal level, and in particular, the
procedure for obtaining permission to drive a highly
automated vehicle, the rules for operating an
unmanned vehicle and responsibility for their
violations, standards that ensure the safety of a person
and his rights under using an unmanned vehicle.
It will also be necessary to adopt national
standards for automated vehicle control, taking into
account international standards of technologically
advanced countries.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research: grant No. 19-29-06008 \ 19
REFERENCES
Air Code of the Russian Federation of 19 march, 1997
60-FZ (ed. of 27.12.2019). Russian newspaper, 59-
60. 26.03.1997.
Antonova, N.V., Balhaeva, S. B., Gaunova, Zh. A. et all.
2019. Legal concept of robotization: monograph/
Responsible Editors: Yu. A. Tikhomirov, S. B. Nanba
Moscow: Prospekt, 240 p.
Automated Driving Systems 2.0. A Vision for Safety. 2017.
U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA. URL:
https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/docum
iMLTrans 2020 - Special Session on Intelligent Mobility, Logistics and Transport
604
ents/13069a-ads2.0_090617_v9a_tag.pdf. [electronic
resource] (accessed January 20, 2020).
Autonomous vehicle knowledge is key to acceptance:
HNTB Survey. 2019. HNTB. URL: https://
www.hntb.com/press_release/autonomous-vehicle-
knowledge-is-key-to-acceptance-hntb-su [electronic
resource] (accessed January 20, 2020).
Autonomous vehicles. Code of Practice for testing in
Belgium. 2016. Responsible editor: Federal Public
Services Mobility and Transport. Brussels. 12 p. URL:
https://mobilit.belgium.be/sites/default/files/resources/
files/code_of_practice_en_2016_09.pdf. [electronic
resource] (accessed January 20, 2020).
Bisht, M., Abbott, J. and Gaffar, A. 2017. Social dilemma
of autonomous cars a critical analysis. IEEE
SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing,
Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing &
Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing,
Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (Smart
World/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI) San
Francisco, CA, pp. 1-3.
Charter of road transport and urban land electric transport.
2007. Federal law on November 08, 2007 259-FZ
(ed. on 30.10.2018). Russian newspaper. 258.
17.11.2007.
Convention on the Law Applicable to Traffic Accidents.
1971. Hague Conference on Private International Law,
Actes et documents de la Onzième session (1968), Tome
III, Accidents de la circulation routière (223 pp.). URL:
https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-
text/?cid=81
Crespo Alexander P. Delivery robots coming to Virginia
sidewalks. 2017. VCU Capital News Service.
InsideNoVa. Northern Virginia's leading news source.
URL: https://www.insidenova.com/news/business/
delivery-robots-coming-to-virginia-sidewalks/article_
c781b3fa-4534-11e7-8597-8fd8d2942881.html.
[electronic resource] (accessed January 20, 2020).
Estonian Act on amendments to the Law on Road Traffic.
2017. ROBOBRAVO. Research Center for Robotics
and Artificial Intelligence Regulation Issues. URL:
http://robopravo.ru/estonskii_zakon_o_robotakhkurier
akh. [electronic resource] (accessed January 20, 2020).
EU Declaration on Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence,
2018. An official website of the European Union. JRC
Science Hub Communities. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/
jrc/communities/en/community/digitranscope/docume
nt/eu-declaration-cooperation-artificial-intelligence.
[electronic resource] (accessed January 20, 2020).
Gaysin, S.V., Kisulenko, B.V., Bocharov, A.V., Pugachev,
V.V. 2017. Intellectual vehicles: experience of the
European Union and prospects in Russia.
The “Žurnal
AAI”. 2(103). pp. 6-10.
Kouchak, M., Gaffar, A., 2017. Determinism in future cars:
Why autonomous trucks are easier to design. IEEE
SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing,
Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing &
Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing,
Internet of People and Smart City Innovation
(SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SC
I). San Francisco, CA, pp. 1-6.
Makarova, I., Mukhametdinov, E., Mavrin, V.,
Duisenbayeva, E., 2019. Product reliability
management throughout the life cycle on transition to
industry 4.0. VEHITS - Proceedings of the 5th
International Conference on Vehicle Technology and
Intelligent Transport Systems. 2019. P.671-678.
Nieuwe wet maakt testen auto’s met bestuurders op afstand
mogelijk. 2017. Nieuwsbericht. 24-11-2017. URL:
https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2017/11/
22/nieuwe-wet-maakt-testen-auto%E2%80%99s-met-
bestuurders-op-afstand-mogelijk
On Amendments to the Air Code of the Russian Federation
regarding the use of unmanned aircraft. 2015. Federal
law 462-FZ. on December 30, 2015. Russian
newspaper, 1. - 11.01.2016.
On approval of the action plan (roadmap) for improving
legislation and removing administrative barriers in
order to ensure the implementation of the National
Technology Initiative in the AutoNet direction. 2018.
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of
march 29, 2018 535-r. Legislation collection of the
Russian Federation. 16.04.2018. 16 (Part II). - art.
2393.
On the experiment on the pilot operation of highly
automated vehicles on public roads (together with the
“Regulations on the experiment on the pilot operation
of high-speed vehicles on public roads”). Decree of the
Government of the Russian Federation of 26 November
26, 2018 1415. Legislation collection of the Russian
Federation. 03.12.2018. 49 (part VI). art. 7619.
On the Rules of the Road (together with the “Basic
Provisions for the Admission of Vehicles to Operation
and the Obligations of Officials to Ensure Road
Safety”). 2019. Decree of the Government of the
Russian Federation of October 23, 1993 1090 (ed.
by 21.12.2019). Russian News. . 227. 11/23/1993.
Pourabdollah M., Bjärkvik E., Fürer F., Lindenberg B. and
Burgdorf K. 2017. Fuel economy assessment of semi-
autonomous vehicles using measured data. IEEE
Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo
(ITEC). Chicago, IL, pp. 761-766.
Resolution on the implementation of highly and fully
automated vehicles in traffic conditions, 2019. Global
Forum for Road Traffic Safety (WP.1). UNESE. URL:
http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp1
/wp1doc/WP1_Resolution_Brochure_EN_web.pdf.
[electronic resource] (accessed January 20, 2020).
Tikhomirov Yu.A., Krysenkova N.B., NANBA S.B.,
Margusheva Zh.A. 2018. Robot and human: a new
partnership? Journal of foreign legislation and
comparative law. 5(72), p.p.5-10.
Vienna Convention on Road Traffic 08.11.1968 (with ed.
on 23.09.2014) 1999. Treaty Series. Volume 1732.
New York: United Nations, pp. 522 – 587.
Vine, S.L, Zolfaghari, A., Polak, J. 2015. Autonomous cars:
The tension between occupant experience and
intersection capacity. Transportation Research Part C.,
vol 52, p.p. 1–14.
Legal Regulation Problems by using Highly Automated Vehicles
605