5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE
WORKS
In this paper, we introduced and discussed the cur-
rent status of the CrazySquare project. It is a re-
search and development project aiming at realizing an
ICT support system for improving playing the gui-
tar within Italian Middle Schools. CrazySquare is
designed to the guitar instrument since it is one of
the most played in the context of Middle Schools.
The strength of the CrazySquare project, unlike the
currently available ICT-tools for music education, is
that it aims to guarantee the acquisition of the learn-
ing objectives that students should learn at the end
of Middle School, as planned by the decree (De-
cree law no. 201, 1999). This can be carried out
through a “construction process" since CrazySquare
is based on two cornerstones: (1) the TEL-oriented
UCD approach, (2) the TPACK framework. The for-
mer guarantees the compliancy of CrazySquare as
an ICT-learning tool with a well-defined pedagogical
theory (Gordon’s MLT); the latter provides a model
of technology-based instruction, integrating pedagog-
ical and technological aspects to ensure the effective
use of technology in teaching activities. In this way,
CrazySquare could overcome the issues of the decree
(Decree law no. 201, 1999) related to the lack of ped-
agogical and technological guidelines to achieve the
learning objectives. Thus, it could be integrated into
classroom practices as a support during the musical
teaching activities and at home, as a support of home-
work activities. Overall, this paper provides a con-
tribution to design issues related to the music teach-
ing field, and especially in the technology-enhanced
learning field. In each step of the CrazySquare’s de-
sign, we have dealt with domain experts both in the
field of psycho-pedagogy and HCI and computer sci-
ence. All domain experts expressed a positive opinion
and validated the efficacy of the psycho-pedagogy ap-
proach and the usability of the system. In the next fu-
ture, the evaluation of the current prototype with end-
users has been planned, as detailed in Subsection 4.5.
REFERENCES
Caruso, F., Di Mascio, T., and Pennese, M. (2019). Gamify
the audiation: The crazysquare project. In 11th Inter-
national Conference on Computer Supported Educa-
tion, pages 92–99.
Decree law no. 201 (1999). Ministerial decree august 6,
1999, n. 201, on the subject of Reconditioning and ar-
rangement of experimental courses in music in middle
school.
Denis, G. and Jouvelot, P. (2005). Motivation-driven edu-
cational game design: applying best practices to mu-
sic education. In International Conference on Ad-
vances in computer entertainment technology, pages
462–465.
Di Mascio, T., Gennari, R., Melonio, A., and Tarantino, L.
(2016). Supporting children in mastering temporal re-
lations of stories: The terence learning approach. Int.
J. Distance Educ. Technol., 14(1):44–63.
Di Mascio, T., Tarantino, L., and Caruso, F. (2020). To-
wards a gamified musical skill learning model (mus-
lm): Structural aspects. In 10th International Con-
ference in Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for
Technology Enhanced Learning.
Dorfman, J. (2013). Theory and practice of technology-
based music instruction. Oxford University Press on
Demand.
EU-GDPR – Art. 8 (2016). Eu general data protection reg-
ulation 2016/679 (GDPR), art. 8 Condition applicable
to child’s consent in relation to Information Society
Services.
Gordon, E. (1986). Intermediate measures of music audia-
tion. GIA Publications.
Gordon, E. (1989). Learning sequences in music: Skill,
content, and patterns. Gia Publications.
Gordon, E. (2007). Learning sequences in music: A con-
temporary music learning theory. Gia Publications.
Gordon, E. E. (2001). Music aptitude and related tests.
Chicago, IL: GIA Publications, Inc.
Hallam, S. and Creech, A. (2010). Music Education in the
21st Century in the United Kingdom: Achievements,
Analysis and Aspirations. ERIC.
ISTAT (2018). Audizione parlamentare: Indagine conosci-
tiva su bullismo e cyberbullismo.
Koehler, M. J. and Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK.
The handbook of technological pedagogical content
knowledge (TPCK) for educators.
Longfellow, H. W. (1857). Outre-mer: a pilgrammage be-
yond the sea. G. Routledge & Co.
Margoudi, M., Oliveira, M., and Waddell, G. (2016). Game-
based learning of musical instruments: A review and
recommendations. In European Conference on Games
Based Learning, pages 426–433.
Miendlarzewska, E. A. and Trost, W. J. (2014). How mu-
sical training affects cognitive development: rhythm,
reward and other modulating variables. Front. Neu-
rosci., 7:279.
Mishra, P. and Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological peda-
gogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher
knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6):1017–
1054.
Nielsen, J. (2019). Ux design for teenagers, 3rd edition.
Pearce, M. and Rohrmeier, M. (2012). Music cognition and
the cognitive sciences. Topics in cognitive science,
4(4):468–484.
Schellenberg, E. G. (2019). Correlation= causation? mu-
sic training, psychology, and neuroscience. Psychol
Aesthet Creat Arts.
Sommerville, I. (2016). Ingegneria del software. Pearson
Italia Spa.
CSME 2020 - Special Session on Computer Supported Music Education
662