safety are taken. This applies both to the most
connected vehicle and control system, as well as to
the infrastructure. (Fig. 3.).
Various combinations of these factors create
many emergency situations, nevertheless, it is
necessary to single out the main ones and, taking the
others as independent factors, determine the patterns
and degree of influence on the design of the vehicle.
As vehicles get smarter, technology and
infrastructure must evolve in tandem. Automation
will increasingly contribute to the rapid reporting of
possible vehicle breakdowns, with the ability to
reserve a place in the vehicle service for servicing and
repairing the vehicle, however, the process of
servicing autonomous vehicles will still require
human involvement in vehicle maintenance.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The transport sector is currently undergoing
significant changes. Connected vehicles are actively
entering our lives. The future of connected vehicles
largely depends on building consumer confidence in
the vehicle. But even though billions are being
invested in creating an autonomous, connected and
environmentally friendly vehicle of the future,
consumers still fear the consequences of introducing
these vehicles.
Transport systems intellectualization and
automation involves a large number of diverse risks.
Based on risk assessment the most likely risks that
have serious consequences for both the person and the
transport system as a whole are associated with the
risk of erroneous algorithms (risk level 15), vehicles
vulnerability (risk level 15), and liability for legal
damage ambiguity risk (risk level 16). Ideally, the
vehicle should predict the actions of the objects
surrounding it and, in accordance with this, adjust its
behavior on the road, while solving the task. If the
vehicle is not adequately trained, this will lead to
erroneous actions and endanger road users. There are
still many problems to solve in this direction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research: grant No. 19-29-06008 \ 19.
REFERENCES
Autonomous vehicle knowledge is key to acceptance: HNTB
Survey, 2020 URL: https://www.hntb.com/
press_release/autonomous-vehicle-knowledge-is-key-
to-acceptance-hntb-su [electronic resource] (accessed
January 20, 2020).
Bagloee, S.A., Tavana, M., Asadi, M., Oliver, T. ,2016.
Autonomous vehicles: challenges, opportunities, and
future implications for transportation policies. Journal
of Modern Transportation, volume 24, Issue 4, 1 p.p.
284-303.
Bansal, P., Kockelman, K.M., 2017 Forecasting Americans’
long-term adoption of connected and autonomous
vehicle technologies. Transportation Research Part A:
Policy and Practice, volume 95, p.p. 49-63.
Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., 2016. The social
dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, volume 352,
Issue 6293, p.p. 1573-1576.
Bosch, P. M, Becker, F., Becker, H., Axhausen, K. W., 2018.
Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services.
Transport Policy, volume 64, p.p. 76–91.
Cui, J., Sabaliauskaite, G., Liew, L.S., Zhou, F., Zhang, B.,
2019. Collaborative Analysis Framework of Safety and
Security for Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Access,
volume: 7, p.p. 148672-148683.
Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K., 2015 Preparing a nation for
autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy
recommendations. Transportation Research Part A:
Policy and Practice, volume 77, p.p. 167-181.
Fong, B., Situ, L., Poon, L. C. K., Liu, J.., Mo, R. T., Tsang,
K. F., 2015. A prognostics framework for reliability
optimization of mass-produced vehicle onboard
diagnostics system. IEEE 4th Global Conference on
Consumer Electronics (GCCE). DOI:
10.1109/GCCE.2015.7398515. pp. 408-409.
Haboucha, C.J., Ishaq, R., Shiftan, Y., 2017. User
preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Trans-
portation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,
volume 78, p.p. 37-49.
Hacker, P., 2017. Personal data, exploitative contracts, and
algorithmic fairness: autonomous vehicles meet the
internet of things. International Data Privacy Law,
volume 7, Issue 4, p.p. 266–286, URL: https://doi.org/
10.1093/idpl/ipx014.
Hamada, Y., Inoue, M., Adachi, N., Ueda, H., Miyashita, Y.,
Hata,Y., 2019 Intrusion detection system for in-vehicle
networks. SEI Technical Review, Issue 88, p.p. 76-81.
Kong, P., Cornet, H., Frenkler, F. 2018. Personas and
Emotional Design for Public Service Robots: A Case
Study with Autonomous Vehicles in Public
Transportation. 2018 International Conference on
Cyberworlds (CW), IEEE, pp. 284-287. DOI:
10.1109/CW.2018.00058.
Lavieri, P. S., Bhat, C.R., 2019. Modeling individuals’
willingness to share trips with strangers in an
autonomous vehicle future. Transportation Research
Part A: Policy and Practice, volume 124, p.p. 242-261.