![](bgc.png)
REFERENCES
Ali, T., Najem, Z., and Sapiyan, M. (2016). Jpl : Implemen-
tation of a prolog system supporting incremental tabu-
lation. In Sixth International conference on Computer
Science and Information Technology (CCSIT 2016),
Zurich, Switzerland, January 02-03, 2016, pages 323–
338.
Bangor, A., Kortum, P., and Miller, J. (2009). Determin-
ing what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an
adjective rating scale. Journal of usability studies,
4(3):114–123.
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale.
In Jordan, P. W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B., and
McClelland, I. L., editors, Usability Evaluation In In-
dustry, chapter 21, pages 189–194. CRC Press.
Cerutti, F., Gaggl, S. A., Thimm, M., and Wallner, J. P.
(2017). Foundations of implementations for formal
argumentation. The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and
their Applications; Special Issue Formal Argumenta-
tion, 4(8).
Costa,
ˆ
A., Heras, S., Palanca, J., Jord
´
an, J., Novais,
P., and Julian, V. (2017). Using argumentation
schemes for a persuasive cognitive assistant system.
In Criado Pacheco, N., Carrascosa, C., Osman, N.,
and Juli
´
an Inglada, V., editors, Multi-Agent Systems
and Agreement Technologies, pages 538–546, Cham.
Springer International Publishing.
Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and
its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic
programming and n-person games. Artificial intelli-
gence, 77(2):321–357.
Eysholdt, M. and Behrens, H. (2010). Xtext: implement
your language faster than the quick and dirty way.
In Proceedings of the ACM international conference
companion on Object oriented programming systems
languages and applications companion, pages 307–
309.
Gaertner, D. and Toni, F. (2007). Computing arguments
and attacks in assumption-based argumentation. IEEE
Intelligent Systems, 22(6):24–33.
Garc
´
ıa, A. J. and Simari, G. R. (2004). Defeasible logic pro-
gramming: An argumentative approach. TPLP, 4(1-
2):95–138.
Kakas, A. and Moraitis, P. (2006). Adaptive agent nego-
tiation via argumentation. In Proceedings of the Fifth
International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents
and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’06, page 384–391,
New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Ma-
chinery.
Kakas, A. C. and Loizos, M. (2016). Cognitive systems:
Argument and cognition. IEEE Intelligent Informatics
Bulletin, 17(1):14–20.
Kakas, A. C. and Moraitis, P. (2003). Argumentation based
decision making for autonomous agents. In The Sec-
ond International Joint Conference on Autonomous
Agents & Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2003, July 14-
18, 2003, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Proceed-
ings, pages 883–890. ACM.
Kakas, A. C., Moraitis, P., and Spanoudakis, N. I. (2019).
GORGIAS: Applying argumentation. Argument &
Computation, 10(1):55–81.
Klug, B. (2017). An overview of the system usability scale
in library website and system usability testing. Weave:
Journal of Library User Experience, 1(6).
Lam, H.-P. and Governatori, G. (2009). The Making of
SPINdle. In Paschke, A., Governatori, G., and Hall, J.,
editors, Proceedings of the 2009 International Sympo-
sium on Rule Interchange and Applications (RuleML
2009), pages 315–322, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Springer-Verlag.
Leff, A. and Rayfield, J. T. (2001). Web-Application
Development Using the Model/View/Controller De-
sign Pattern. In 5th International Enterprise Dis-
tributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2001),
4-7 September 2001, Seattle, WA, USA, Proceedings,
pages 118–127. IEEE.
McDonald, S. and Petrie, H. (2013). The effect of global
instructions on think-aloud testing. In Proceedings of
the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Com-
puting Systems, pages 2941–2944. ACM.
Modgil, S. (2006). Hierarchical argumentation. In Eu-
ropean Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence,
pages 319–332. Springer.
Pautasso, C., Zimmermann, O., and Leymann, F. (2008).
RESTful Web Services vs. “Big” Web Services: Mak-
ing the Right Architectural Decision. In Proceedings
of the 17th international conference on World Wide
Web, pages 805–814. ACM.
Petrie, H. and Power, C. (2012). What do users re-
ally care about?: a comparison of usability problems
found by users and experts on highly interactive web-
sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on
Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2107–
2116. ACM.
Pison, A. (2017). D
´
eveloppement d’un outil d’aide au
triage des patients aux urgences ophtalmologiques
par l’infirmi
`
ere d’accueil
`
a l’aide du syst
`
eme
d’argumentation Gorgias-B. Technical report, LI-
PADE, Paris Descartes University.
Snaith, M. and Reed, C. (2012). TOAST: online aspic
+
implementation. In Computational Models of Argu-
ment - Proceedings of COMMA 2012, Vienna, Austria,
September 10-12, 2012, pages 509–510.
Spanoudakis, N., Kostis, K., and Mania, K. (2020). Argu-
mentation for all. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual
ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC ’20),
pages 980–982, New York, NY, USA. Association for
Computing Machinery.
Spanoudakis, N. I., Constantinou, E., Koumi, A., and
Kakas, A. C. (2017). Modeling data access legislation
with gorgias. In International Conference on Indus-
trial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied
Intelligent Systems, pages 317–327. Springer.
Spanoudakis, N. I., Kakas, A. C., and Moraitis, P. (2016).
Gorgias-B: Argumentation in Practice. In Computa-
tional Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA
2016, Potsdam, Germany, 12-16 September, 2016.,
pages 477–478.
Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., and Eemeren, F. H.
(2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The
pragma-dialectical approach, volume 14. Cambridge
University Press.
Web-Gorgias-B: Argumentation for All
297