Besides, the high-tech medical information contained
in patient requests could serve as a good basis for the
formation of appropriate datasets, but for this it is
necessary to develop appropriate organizational and
motivational procedures.
Thus, there is the problem of integration of social
media platforms and specialized web resources for
the effective use of high-tech medical information,
which is especially relevant for medicine in
developing countries. In the article, this task is
considered in relation to the Russian-speaking
segment of the Internet.
Namely, we have experimentally studied the
structure of public medical Internet communities
typical for Russia. We found that they are
characterized by self-organization. We have
developed and launched a web resource for the
effective use of high-tech medical information, and to
form the motivational component of the resource, we
use the identified structure of already existing
network communities of medical focus. We use
specialized chat bots as an effective means of
integrating the developed resource and network
communities.
2 BACKGROUND AND RELATED
WORKS
Internet services, on which experienced doctors
provide the patient with their reports on his high-tech
medical information, are widely represented in
medically developed countries, for example in USA
– Second Opinions (from 29$), 2nd.MD ($3,000); in
India – SeekMed (video communication with a
specialist is provided). These services are websites or
applications with a strictly defined business model,
which implies the legitimacy and security of the
transmitted information. Most of these services are
expensive and therefore not available to everyone.
Similar services also exist in Russia, for example:
Cardio-online; National Teleradiological Network.
But, all of them are not free and have a very narrow
specialization.
In addition to specialized Internet-services, there
is also the possibility of interpreting high-tech
medical information through social networks, like
Facebook. In Russia and in most developing countries
such as Iran, Malaysia etc., the Telegram messenger
is much more popular. A large share of the Russian-
speaking segment of the Internet is also occupied by
the social network VKontakte. In these social
networks, communities related to medicine,
cardiology, cardiac surgery, radiology, and neurology
are popular. But, although these communities are
usually administered by professional doctors, it is
impossible to guarantee the adequacy of the
interpretation of medical information here.
The issues of obtaining and interpreting medical
information in social media are studied in the
literature mainly in the aspect of crowdsourcing
(Wang, 2020; Kalantarian, 2019; Tucker, 2019).
(McCoy, 2014) defines crowdsourcing to outsource a
task to a group or community of people. (Tucker,
2019) concerns crowdsourcing activity as online
collaboration systems.
Many studies suggest crowdsourcing to perform
only separate, well-structured tasks - for example, for
pre-clinical research (Tucker, 2019), for formatting
incoming information, for improving the quality of the
extracted facts (Kalantarian, 2019). To process
information at a higher level by means of
crowdsourcing, it is proposed to involve specialists.
For example, in (Yoshida, 2016) hundreds of scientists
were recruited first to generate, and then to assess
competing health research ideas using a pre-defined set
of priority-setting criteria. At the same time, there are
examples of using crowdsourcing in artificial
intelligence projects, most often related to annotation
of medical data (Wang, 2020).
Insufficient attention is paid to the composition
and structure of the interaction of crowdsourcing
participants. As noted in the review (Créquit, 2018),
сrowd workers’ characteristics and crowdsourcing
logistics are poorly reported in the reviewed articles.
Crowd workers’ characteristics are frequently
missing: even age and gender are not reported for
about 60% of the studies.
Among the motivating factors for contribution or
collaboration in medical crowdsourcing, various
researchers distinguish recognition, curiosity, intrinsic
satisfaction, or, in some situations, financial incentives
(McCartney, 2013; Go, 2015; Chiauzzi, 2015]. The
(WHO, 2018) recommendations for underdeveloped
countries suggest such an unexpected mechanism for
motivating crowdsourcing, as the organization of
challenge contests for health. However, in general this
aspect of crowdsourcing remains outside the attention of
researchers: according to the review (Créquit, 2018), of
202 studies motivations of crowd workers were
recorded for 5 only.
The analysis performed allows us to draw the
following conclusions.
The use of communities in social networks is
convenient and accessible to all segments of the
population, but at the same time it does not guarantee
the legitimacy and reliability of the interpretation