![](bg8.png)
carried out in Phase (iii) was to verify that the rec-
ommendation met the demands of the organizers, a
mechanism that was validated. Additionally, the ex-
perts participating in the survey classified the pro-
posal as innovative and useful, thus revealing the po-
tential of Techs4Events as an innovative system.
From the tests, it was possible to plan future goals,
among them, improving the way the tool commu-
nicates with the end user and reorganizing the way
the software provides the final information. (list of
recommended technologies). Among the suggestions
from the participants, grouping the technologies by
common categories and improving the calculation of
the compatibility of technologies with the event are
high priority points in the list of future improvements.
Thus, Techs4Events was considered satisfactory,
achieving great acceptance from the users participat-
ing in the tests and proved to be functionally effective
and relevant.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research, carried out within the scope of the
Samsung-UFAM Project for Education and Research
(SUPER), according to Article 48 of Decree no
6.008/2006(SUFRAMA), was funded by Samsung
Electronics of Amazonia Ltda., under the terms
of Federal Law no 8.387/1991, through agreement
001/2020, signed with Federal University of Ama-
zonas and FAEPI, Brazil and through agreement nº
003/2019 (PROPPGI), signed with ICOMP/UFAM.
Also supported by Coordination for the Improvement
of Higher Education Personnel - Brazil (CAPES) -
Financing Code 001, CNPq process 311494/2017-0,
and Foundation for Research Support of the State
of Amazonas (FAPEAM) - POSGRAD and process
062.00150/2020.
REFERENCES
Aggarwal, C. C. (2016). Recommender Systems - The Text-
book. Springer.
Ayob, N., W. N. . O. A. (June 2011). A measurement model
of visitor’s event experience within festivals and spe-
cial events. In Proceedings of the 5th International
Conference of the Asian Academy of Applied Business
(AAAB), pages 9–10. Phhom Penh, Cambodia.
Burns, L. A. (2016). The concept album as vi-
sual—sonic—textual spectacle: The transmedial sto-
ryworld of coldplay’s mylo xyloto. IASPM@ journal,
6(2):91–116.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of
use, and user acceptance of information technology.
MIS quarterly, pages 319–340.
Freeman, J., Xie, S., Tsuchiya, T., Shen, W., Chen, Y.-L.,
and Weitzner, N. (2015). Using massmobile, a flexi-
ble, scalable, rapid prototyping audience participation
framework, in large-scale live musical performances.
Digital Creativity, 26(3-4):228–244.
Getz, D. (2007). Event studies: Theory, research and policy
for planned events.
Getz, D. et al. (1997). Event management & event tourism.
Cognizant Communication Corp.
Gomes, G., de Freitas Rosiane, Castro, T., and Gadelha, B.
(2020). Interaheu: Heuristics for technological inter-
action on events. In Proceedings of the XIX Simp
´
osio
Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Com-
putacionais - IHC 2020, MG, Brasil.
Jago, L. K. (1997). Special events and tourism behaviour:
a conceptualisation and an empirical analysis from a
values perspective. PhD thesis, Victoria University.
Ludvigsen, M. and Veerasawmy, R. (2010). Designing
technology for active spectator experiences at sport-
ing events. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference
of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest
Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction,
pages 96–103.
Mackellar, J. (2013). Event Audiences and Expectations.
Routledge advances in event research series. Rout-
ledge.
Martins, G., Gomes, G., Luiza Conceic¸
˜
ao, J., Marques,
L., da Silva, D., Castro, T., Gadelha, B., and de Fre-
itas Rosiane (2020). Enhanced interaction: audience
engagement in entertainment events through the bum-
bometer app. In Proceedings of the XIX Simp
´
osio
Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Com-
putacionais, MG, Brasil.
Nelimarkka, M., Kuikkaniemi, K., Salovaara, A., and
Jacucci, G. (2016). Live participation: augmenting
events with audience-performer interaction systems.
In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on de-
signing interactive systems, pages 509–520.
Ricci, F., Rokach, L., and Shapira, B. (2011). Introduc-
tion to recommender systems handbook. In Ricci,
F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., and Kantor, P. B., edi-
tors, Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 1–35.
Springer.
Sheridan, J., Bryan-Kinns, N., Reeves, S., Marshall, J.,
and Lane, G. (2011). Graffito: crowd-based perfor-
mative interaction at festivals. In CHI’11 Extended
Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
pages 1129–1134. ACM.
Vasconcelos, V., Amazonas, M., Castro, T., Freitas, R., and
Gadelha, B. (2018). Watch or immerse?: Redefining
your role in big shows. In Proceedings of the 17th
Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Comput-
ing Systems, page 41. ACM.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical exten-
sion of the technology acceptance model: Four longi-
tudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2):186–
204.
ICEIS 2021 - 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
532