Figure 12: IRST model with PI controller
PI controller Parameter values:{ Kg=2000, Kf= 0.027,
Kt= 0.07, R=10, L=1e-05, Kd = 5, I/J=8.6, PI & AI value
are tunable}
During simulation, when we setup the parameter
of PI controller [proportional (P) =240 and Integral
(I) =180], the simulation result showed there much
error in target position and senor measured position
as figure 13..After tuning and simulation we found
that at PI Proportional (P) =1000 and Integral (I)
=500, there is less error found in actual position and
senor measured position as shown in figure 14.
Figure 13: Graph target position and senor measured
position[Proportional (P) =240 and Integral (I) =180]
Figure 14: Graph target position and senor measured
position [Proportional (P) =1000 and Integral (I) =500]
6 CONCLUSION
The proposed IRST system have IR channel, TV
camera, and LRF is installed in a single optical
window with two different signal processer, first IR
signal processor use for IR signal processing in IR
channel and second video signal processor for video
signal in Thermal/ video channel. The
communication between IRST CPU (ICPU) with
aircraft system done by using two type of bus
protocol. The IR signal processor use ARINC
429/1535b bus protocol and video processor use
ARINC 8181 bus protocol under control and
supervision ICPU. The Proposed modification in the
IRST system improve the performance, reduce the
size, and weight that is basic need of fighter aircraft.
The simulation result shows, that the Tracker
JPDA and TOMHT with IMM filter tracks
maneuvering targets more precisely and did not
break or lose the track even during the turns and in
the ambiguous region. The targets are more precisely
tracked during the turn and are sufficiently separated
in the ambiguity region However, the runtime for a
tracker TOMHT is significantly longer than using
tracker JPDA and computational data is less hence
required less memory space than tracker JPDA.
REFERENCES
Yilmaz, A., Shafique, K. and Shah, M. (2003). Target
tracking in airborne forward looking infrared imagery.
Elsevier Science.
Nengli, D., Qi J. G., and Jiaguang, M. (2001). New
approach to detect dim moving point targets based on
motion analysis. SPIE.
Yang, Hi.(2015). Detection and Tracking of Infrared Dim
Small Image Sequence Moving Target. The Open
Automation and Control Systems Journal.
Blom, H.,and Bar-Shalom, Y.(1988). The interacting
multiple model algorithm for systems with Monrovian
switching coefficients. IEEE Transactions on
Automatic Control.
Konstantin, P., Udvarev A., and Semerdjiev T.(2003). A
Study of a Target Tracking Algorithm Using Global
Nearest Neighbor Approach. InternationalConference
on Computer Systems and Technologies.
Tchango, A. F., Thomas. V., Buffet, O., Dutech, A., and
Flacher F., Tracking Multiple Interacting Targets
Using A Joint Probabilistic Data Association Filter.
Thales Services SAS Company.
Blackman, S.S. (2004). Multiple Hypothesis Tracking for
Multiple Target Tracking. IEEE, A&E Systems
Magazine.
Li, Q., Liu L., and Tang S.(2017). Composite Axis Control
System Development of Airborne Electro-Optical
Platform. IEEE 8th International Conference
Koretsky G.M., Nicoll J. F., and Taylor M.S.(2013). A
tutorial on Electro-optical / Infrared (EO/IR) theory
and systems. Institute of Defense Analysis (IDA).
Mazor, E., Averbuch, A., Bar-shalom, Y., Dayan,
J.(1998). Interacting multiple model in target tracking:
a survey. IEEE Trans. Aerospace.