(Zubarev, 2017; Zhadan, 2018; Sudarushkina and
Stefanova, 2017; Chernova, 2019; Shvab, 2016;
Digital economy-national projects-Khabarovsk
territory, 2020; Official portal "Ministry of digital
development, communications and mass
communications of the Russian Federation", 2020).
1.2 Assessment of Individual Indicators
of Socio-economic Development in
the Digital Economy Contour
In terms of the use of information and communication
technologies, in General, the regions of the far
Eastern Federal district reach the national average,
while the remoteness of the far Eastern Federal
district from the Western regions of Russia plays an
important role. on the one hand, the use of the Internet
and home computers in households reaches an
average of 70%, while online purchases make up
28.6%, which is associated with the delivery of these
goods to remote areas (i.e., a poorly developed
logistics network for delivering online purchases to
the population) (Federal state statistics service, 2019).
The use of public services on the Digital government
portal reaches 47% in the far Eastern Federal district,
which, according to the authors, is due to insufficient
coverage of public services that can be obtained by
the population in electronic form, and MFC exist and
do not work in all hard-to-reach areas of the far
Eastern Federal district (or their work is not
profitable) (Decree Of the government of the Russian
Federation No. 313, 2014; Decree of the President of
the Russian Federation No. 204, 2018).
2 PROBLEM STATEMENT
The authors of the study analyze individual socio-
economic processes related to the development of the
digital economy in the region. We tried to evaluate
individual indicators of socio-economic development
using classical methods of econometric analysis, and
also selected various models to implement data
analysis as accurately as possible. For the purpose of
the study, the further use of the obtained results of the
found model for forecasting and adjusting
management programs was laid. However, there was
a complication that the time spent by researchers to
search for and evaluate the results of the selected
model was large. The time interval for obtaining a
ready-made assessment and the possibility of using it
to adjust socio-economic development measures
overlapped with the time for calculating and selecting
the desired model. At the time of receiving the results
of the assessment of socio-economic development
processes in the region in the digital economy
contour, these results were already outdated. The
authors tried to determine whether classical methods
of econometric analysis are suitable for assessing
complex systems of socio-economic development in
the region in modern conditions. At the same time, I
would like to emphasize that econometric methods
and models have proven themselves well for
analyzing and evaluating relatively simple
dependencies: when considering the relationship of
several factors that affect the result, there are not
many endogenous and exogenous variables in the
model; each individual factor included in the model
does not represent a complex system of interaction of
additional variables. However, socio-economic
processes in the region are always a multi-factor
complex system, in which individual variables, both
endogenous and exogenous, can be revealed, again,
as a complex system. For example, the standard of
living of the population depends on nominal accrued
wages, expenditure patterns of households,
unemployment rate, availability of medical care,
structure, household income, housing affordability,
crime rates in the region, etc., each listed variable of
influence is a complex system dependent on many
other factors, and are interrelated. Formal work is like
unemployment rate and crime rates (crime rate and
unemployment rate are directly proportional), the
same processes affect training of the population, the
possibility of retraining, the level of culture, family
values etc.
Any econometric analysis involves the processing
of statistical information previously collected either
through official (state) services, such as regional
divisions of Rosstat, or through specialized
representative surveys, which involve the
involvement of both state and non-state funds and
institutions of socio-economic analysis (Federal state
statistics service, 2019).
At the same time, the econometric models
themselves are divided into spatial models and
temporal models (trend analysis models). Spatial
models assume an assessment of socio-economic
processes at a given time. Time series-construction of
the development trend of the socio-economic process
under study for a number of consecutive moments in
time. Both in the first and in the second case the
forecast values can be calculated quite successfully
based on the found model; in both cases, the sample
of data used to build an econometric model should not
only be representative of the quality of the collected
statistical data, but also in terms of volume: less than
Application of Econometric Methods and Neural Network Analysis in Regional Sustainable Development Management Programs