Thus, the study of the sustainability of the
development of the socio-economic system (SES) of
the region implies that in its structure it is possible to
distinguish subsystems that affect the state of
sustainability, namely: society, material and technical
complex and natural resources, while it is assumed
that the sustainability of development should be
characteristic of each of them. The special place of
society is not only because the ability of residents of
the territory to maintain life well-being and social
stability is the goal of the development of the system,
but also because society is a decisive element in the
development of productive forces.
Assessing the sustainability of the socio-
economic development of the region as opposed to its
crisis state, it is necessary to pay attention to two
circumstances:
the ability to function as a self-developing
system is the most important functional
characteristic of the region (Gutman, 2002);
in the list of indicators of sustainable
development of the territory, which determine
the main forms of security - social, economic,
environmental, a special place is occupied by
health care as a subsystem playing a leading
role in maintaining the state of society.
For many years, health care in the studies of
Soviet and Russian scientists was defined as a branch
of the non-production sphere, which is characterized
by the spending of budgetary funds, without
participation in the formation of the national product.
A preliminary assessment of the results of the
implementation of specific economic mechanisms
that ensure the solution of urgent problems of
preserving the health of the population showed the
nature of their impact on the state of sustainability of
the SES in the region.
Leading experts in the field of healthcare have
repeatedly considered the need for a more dynamic
change in the financing system (Panurin and Khan,
2017; Martynova, 2019; Pyatakovich et al., 2004;
Rizvanova, 2006). The formulated requirements for
the content of measures to improve the effectiveness
of health care financing also include the need to
change the funding mechanism, taking into account
the strategic goal of increasing the level of motivation
of participants.
The measures presented to address the challenge
of changing the funding mechanism in accordance
with the recommendations should include:
strengthening the reasonableness of the
allocation of funds allocated to health care;
greater transparency in the use of financial
resources;
development of competition between medical
organizations in the compulsory health
insurance fund (CIHF) system (where
possible);
widespread introduction of new ways to pay for
medical care in the CIHF.
At the same time, an analysis of the practice of
financing the health care system in the region, carried
out on the example of the Irkutsk region, showed that
financing of health care is carried out at different
levels of management with the implementation of
signs of several economic mechanisms. However, the
main, from the point of view of implementation
efficiency, is the approach to the design of the
economic mechanism as a tool for managing facilities
(Kulman, 1993), which is implemented within the
framework of the State Program “Healthcare
Development” (State program «Development of
health care», 2017). Such a mechanism assumes:
1. Coordination of resources, providing an
effective solution to the problems of managing the
economic system. In almost every health care system,
there is inevitably a combination of public and private
funding, however, the issue of forming an economic
mechanism is mainly in the competence of the state,
regardless of the share of public funding. In the
proposed model, one-channel financing is considered
as the basic situation established in connection with
the existing regulatory instruments (Martynova,
2019).
2. The state reacts to changes in the values of
criterion indicators characterizing the state of
sustainability of the regional socio-economic system
through monitoring key indicators of national health
(Martynova, 2019). The achievement of the objective
function is assessed by numerical criteria, based on
reports. In accordance with the state program
"Development of health care", target indicators and
indicators have been established, the value of which
characterizes the level of sustainability of SES:
“satisfaction of the population with the quality
of medical care, percentage”;
“mortality of the population of working age
(per 100 thousand of the population of the
corresponding age)”;
“mortality from neoplasms (including
malignant ones) (per 100 thousand
population)”;
“life expectancy at birth, years”;
“mortality from diseases of the circulatory
system (per 100 thousand population)”.
3. The control subsystem determines the rules
for the functioning of the SES.
ISSDRI 2021 - International Scientific and Practical Conference on Sustainable Development of Regional Infrastructure