2 METHODS
The adoption of the new Doctrine of Information
Security of the Country (ConsultantPlus, 2016) based
on the Development Strategy of the Information
Society in the Russian Federation (ConsultantPlus-1,
2017) and the new Strategy for the Economic
Security of the Russian Federation (ConsultantPlus-
2, 2017) will allow creation of a legal framework for
counteracting economic digital crime (Ovchinsky,
2017).
This indicates a steady tendency in recent years to
reduce the number of recorded digital crimes of an
economic nature with an increase in the share of
economic crimes committed on a large and especially
large scale. This is largely due to the mechanism of
established corruption relations worked out to date
within the economic and digital sphere (Tikhomirov,
2017).
Therefore, cross-border high-tech digital crime
realizes its criminal capabilities beyond any state
borders using software as a crime tool.
As an example, the Watson Discovery Advisor
cloud technology, which was previously created by
the government for scientific development and
analytical research, and is currently being used to
solve criminal tasks, in particular, the development of
new types of firearms (Weaponland, 2012).
It is no wonder that criminal statistics began to
record unlawful acts committed with the use of
computer and communication technologies from the
beginning of 2017 taking into account crimes of an
economic nature (2572 crimes were detected in
January-March). These indicators do not take into
account the level of latency and the colossal
victimization factor (Ministry of Internal Affairs of
Russia, 2017).
In this case, the interaction of representatives of
legal business, who hire high-tech criminals to
purloin intellectual property or discredit competitors,
erases the borders and legalizes money obtained by
criminal means at the same time actively, on an ever-
increasing scale.
The introduction of cryptocurrency into the
financial turnover, which allows international crime
to engage in cyber blackmailing offenses, facilitates
the criminal legalization of funds. In particular, in
May 2017, the WannaCru ransomware “attacked”
computers in 150 countries of the world, with the
subsequent solicitation of $3,000 in bitcoins to unlock
computer networks.
During the 4 months of 2017, more than 50 banks
around the world fell victim to the banking Trojan
GM Bot, which disguised as their official
applications. The customers of Citibank, ING, Bank
of America mobile applications, as well as other
large-scale banks in the United States, Canada,
Australia and Europe were among the victims of the
malware.
Kaspersky Lab registered 205 thousand attempts
to infect user resources in 2013, 1.8 million in 2016,
and more than 1.65 million during the first eight
months of 2017.
In February 2018, a cryptocurrency miner
launched on more than 4 thousand Internet sites
around the world, including American, Australian
and UK Internet resources, which illegally used up to
40 % of the computing power of visitors
(Professionals.ru, 2018).
Cybercrime can be associated with not only
information security problems, but also with threats
to statehood, the military-industrial and industrial
complex, and life support infrastructure (CRN, 2017;
Tseveleva and Starinov, 2020).
The criminal legal risks and threats caused by new
forms of economic crime implemented using digital
technologies are so diverse that the only way to
counter them is with the joint efforts of the whole
society (Ovchinsky and Larina, 2017).
Moreover, under the agreement of the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization in 2009, a legally binding
mechanism was formulated that restricted the
activities of states in the use of information
technologies, but most of its norms have not received
practical development (Professionals.ru, 2017).
Therefore, now, criminological prerequisites have
appeared for forming of international legal acts and
for organizing of appropriate fiscal structures that
could counteract transnational crime.
In addition, we are talking about international
cooperation of states in countering “transnational
crime, including coordination of legal policy,
unification of legal norms, conclusion of relevant
international agreements and mutual legal assistance”
(Nomokonov, 2010).
In this connection, a foreign experience is of
interest in the effective implementation of
criminological policies in the People's Republic of
China as part of the implementation of a social trust
program for each citizen. In 2014, the State Council
of the People's Republic of China introduced the
“Program for creating a social credit system (2014–
2020). The system is already operating in pilot mode
in about thirty cities of China (Carnegie Moscow
Center-1, 2017).
High-ranking holders will enjoy various social
and economic benefits. However, those who with a
rating that does not meet the requirements will have