publications (Nosanenko, 2019, Grishin, 2018,
Popova, 2018).
Despite the acute shortage of organs received
from living donors, which under the current
legislation can only be the patient's relatives, the issue
of so-called “intravital donation” in general does not
cause problems in law enforcement and medical
practice.
According to the Law of the Russian Federation
No.4180-I dated December 22, 1992 “On
Transplantation of human organs and (or) tissues”,
transplantation of organs and tissues is allowed only
with the consent of a living donor and, as a rule, with
the consent of the recipient (Article 1). A similar
norm is reflected in the Federal Law No. 323-FZ
dated November 21, 2011 "On the basics of health
protection of the citizens in the Russian Federation.”
In the foreign legal field, the informed consent
model is interpreted within the strictly defined legal
context of the algorithm and is subject to deep
research analysis by the professional community
(Grady, 2017), discussion and popularization in the
field of social and educational work among the
population.
In domestic medical practice, an insufficiently
developed mechanism for implementing the
"presumption of consent” in view of the low
awareness of citizens, generates collisions. Thus,
despite the fact that the procedure for the organization
of the collection of donor organs is regulated by
federal legislation and by the legal and regulatory acts
of the Ministry of Health (orders, instructions, rules),
the issue of the removal of organs and tissues from
the deceased (decedent) donor continues to be acute
and sensitive, both for the close relatives of the
potential donor and for medical workers who,
according to judicial practice, may be accused of
violating the instructions upon the removal
(collection) of an organ if they were not aware of the
will of the deceased or his relatives (see: The
determination of the Constitutional Court of the
Russian Federation in the case of A. Sablina) or
intentionally causing death for the purpose of using
the victim`s organs or tissues.
As evidenced by existing Russian law
enforcement practice, the absence of a request from
medical workers on the expression of will on the issue
of possible donation from relatives of the deceased
and removal by default, in accordance with the
existing presumption of consent, organs and (or)
tissues does not entail criminal liability, which causes
a sharply negative assessment relatives.
The legal professional community is considering
the concept of criminalizing the failure by medical
personnel to inform the victim's relatives about the
planned removal of the donor organ.
Currently, in accordance with the legislation in
force, a physician informs the spouse or other
relatives only about the fact of death, not of the
prospect of organ removal, and expects the donor`s
relatives about their refusal, and if there is no such
person or if it is not possible to contact the relatives
of the deceased within a specified period of time, the
removal of organs is considered possible.
There are no special provisions in the Criminal
Law on the criminal liability of medical personnel for
committing such acts, that is, for violation of the will
of the relatives of the potential (real) donor who
ignores the explicit or unequivocal disagreement of
relatives to the removal (exploitation) of organs.
The proposal under discussion in the legal
community to hold medical personnel criminally
liable for failing to notify relatives about the planned
posthumous organ removal, in our view, does not
have any immediate legislative prospect, since it
legally contradicts to the essence of the presumption
of consent, contained both in the existing legislation
and in the new bill.
It seems that in a situation of acute shortage of
transplants, the legislative substitution of the
“presumption of consent” model by the model of
“requested consent” can also have numerous negative
consequences, at least to cause an increase in cases of
coercion to the remove (collect) organs from living
donors, and will definitely multiply the number and
mortality of citizens in dire need and who have not
waited for transplantation.
The study of law enforcement (judicial) practice
allows us to state a very limited practice of
responding to violations of the current legislation in
this industry, which, of course, cannot testify in favor
of the fact that there are no such violations.
Thus, the analysis of the official statistical
information of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of
Russia, as well as the statistics of convicted persons
in the "Justice" system of the Judicial Department of
the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on cases
related to the trafficking in donor organs, shows zero
indicators in recent years. Moreover, the declared
prohibition on the purchase and sale of human organs
and tissues has not received proper criminal law
support, and there is an obvious legal gap.
A study of criminal legislation showed that the
Criminal Code provides norms on liability for a
number of crimes related to the illegal removal of
human organs and tissues, in particular for:
compulsion to remove human organs or tissues
for transplantation, committed with the use of