Criminal Law Means of Counteracting Illegal Trafficking in Human
Organs and Tissues
Andrey Anatolyevich Kochin
1a
and Vera Ivanovna Kovalenko
2b
1
FSIRI of the FPS Russia Moscow, Russian Federation
2
The Institute of State and Law of The Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Keywords: Illegal trafficking in organs and tissues, donor organs, human trafficking.
Abstract: The article examines the legal regime of human organs and tissues in Russia and the problems of criminal law
support for countering the illegal trafficking in donor organs. The authors’ goal is to research the problems of
law enforcement in the transplant industry and to develop criminal justice response to the illegal trafficking
in donor organs. The tasks of the research include the study of international and foreign experience in
countering the illegal trafficking in donor organs, an analysis of the legal regime for the trafficking in donor
organs and the problems of domestic law enforcement practice to detect and counteract their illicit trafficking,
negotiation of legal gaps and the relevance of the criminalization of offences related to the illegal trafficking
in human organs and tissues. The authors drew on the comparative legal method of research on international
and domestic legislation, materials of domestic law enforcement practice, expert reviews of the legal
regulation problems and prevention of illegal practices with donor organs. The novelty is characterized by
the criminal law provisions proposed by the authors on liability for offences related to illegal transplantation
practices.
1 INTRODUCTION
The fundamental principles and legal bases of
countering the illegal transplantation practice and the
trafficking in human organs and tissues are reflected
in international, regional (European) and national
regulatory documents.
In the era of the rapid development of innovative
technologies in the medical sector, the aim of criminal
law protection of constitutional human rights and
freedoms during the provision of high-tech medical
services and prevention of crimes in this area is of
extremely relevant.
According to the World Health Organization
(WHO), about 100,800 organ transplants are
performed annually all around the world. In the world
list of countries by the number of transplants, Russia
traditionally ranks in the third to fourth ten in the
number of donors and operations per 100 million
population.
In the current year (as of March 2021), according
to the V. I. Shumakov Federal Research Center of
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-1513
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7303-1762
Transplantology and Artificial Organs, 376
transplantation operations were carried out in Russia,
in 2020 - 1919 transplantation operations due to the
unfavorable sanitary and epidemiological situation
and the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is
less than in 2019, when more than 2.4 thousand
transplantation operations were performed (including
200 operations for children), while there were over
9.5 thousand patients on the waiting list.
The rapid emergence of the COVID-19
coronavirus pandemic predetermined a tense
situation in various spheres of life of the state,
especially in the medical sector, created new
challenges for specialists in the transplantation
industry of domestic medicine. In this regard,
specialists from the country's leading transplant
center, the V. I. Shumakov Federal Research Center
of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, warn about
the high risk of severe complications of COVID-19
for citizens who have undergone surgery and have
chronic diseases, it is proposed to seriously evaluate
Kochin, A. and Kovalenko, V.
Criminal Law Means of Counteracting Illegal Trafficking in Human Organs and Tissues.
DOI: 10.5220/0010627200003152
In Proceedings of the VII International Scientific-Practical Conference “Criminal Law and Operative Search Activities: Problems of Legislation, Science and Practice” (CLOSA 2021), pages
21-26
ISBN: 978-989-758-532-6; ISSN: 2184-9854
Copyright
c
2021 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
21
the ratio of “potential benefits and risks of donor
organ transplantation” (Gautier, 2020).
The current Russian legislation generally
regulates all aspects of transplantation, however, as in
the rest of the world, Russia has a pressing need for
donor organs.
As State Secretary - Deputy Minister of Health of
the Russian Federation
D. Kostennikov said in an interview with TASS,
only about 30% of the total number of necessary
transplantation operations are performed in Russia,
which condemns a significant number of Russians to
serious health consequences, many of the waiting list
do not live up to operations.
The shortage of donor organs is a worldwide
problem, which leads to a large shadow market for the
purchase and sale of human organs and tissues.
The Istanbul Declaration dated 2008 prohibits all
forms of trafficking in organs. However, according to
authoritative international publications, with an acute
shortage of organs worldwide, the illegal trade in
organs amounts to about USD 1.5 billion annually
and as a result 12,000 illegal transplantations.
According to the information presented in the
report of Transnational Crime and the Developing
World in only five main organs about 11,966 illegal
transplantations are performed per year in the world,
the annual profits generated by transnational crime in
the field of trafficking in human organs and tissues
range from 840 million up to USD 1.7 billion.
On the basis of an analysis of the results of
scientific research and the state of domestic
transplantation, the authors suggest that, in the
context of a pandemic, crime associated with illegal
trafficking in organs has an unfavorable prognosis. In
this regard, we studied the problems of legal
regulation and law enforcement in the transplantation
industry in order to develop criminal justice response
to the illegal trafficking in donor organs. The tasks of
the research included the review of international and
foreign experience in countering the illegal
trafficking in donor organs, an analysis of the legal
regime for the trafficking in donor organs and the
problems of domestic law enforcement practice to
identify and counteract their illegal trafficking,
discussion of legal gaps and the relevance of
criminalization of offences related to trafficking in
human organs and tissues.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
An empirical study was performed by the authors in
2018-2020 by reviewing statistical data related to
transplantation activities, materials of Russian law
enforcement practice on the identification,
assessment and prevention of crimes in the area under
consideration, analyzing of expert assessments and
the results of a survey of specialists on the problems
of legislative regulation of the legal regime of donor
organs and tissues and problems of prevention of
criminal offences in this area.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
An analysis of the results of empirical study, the state
of legislation and law enforcement practice allowed
the authors to identify the main problems in the
research area.
In the criminological context, the impact of the
coronavirus pandemic on the transplant industry is
considered to be an extremely negative factor, not
only creating additional tension in the functioning of
this branch of medicine, and, consequently,
conditions for possible abuse (negligence, medical
error, abuse of authority), but also representing an
additional threat to the life and health of both
recipients and potential donors. Moreover, this factor
increases the shortage (and therefore the “price”) of
transplantable organs and tissues, and greatly
increases the number of patients needing
transplantation.
We agree with the views of foreign experts, who
rightly emphasize thatCOVID-19 is an ideal storm
for victims of organ trafficking…. the pandemic has
not only caused devastation to millions of infected
people, but also caused a deadly side effect in the
form of an even more prosperous organ trafficking
industry.”
However, a comparative analysis of the indicators
of illegal transplantation practice showed that Russia
is the only country in which above-mentioned crimes
have not actually been registered in the past five
years, only a few facts of such offences were
previously recorded (three crimes were registered
under Article 120 of the Criminal Code of the Russian
Federation “Compulsion to remove human organs or
tissues for transplantation” (in 2005, 2006, 2015) and
two cases of human trafficking for the purpose of
illegal transplantation of human organs and tissues
(clause "g", part 2, article 127.1).
Russian specialists are unanimous in their
observation of serious gaps in the legal regulation of
criminal liability for acts related to the illegal
trafficking in donor organs. Scientists have paid the
closest attention to these issues in scientific
CLOSA 2021 - VII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “CRIMINAL LAW AND OPERATIVE SEARCH
ACTIVITIES: PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATION, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE”
22
publications (Nosanenko, 2019, Grishin, 2018,
Popova, 2018).
Despite the acute shortage of organs received
from living donors, which under the current
legislation can only be the patient's relatives, the issue
of so-called “intravital donation” in general does not
cause problems in law enforcement and medical
practice.
According to the Law of the Russian Federation
No.4180-I dated December 22, 1992 “On
Transplantation of human organs and (or) tissues”,
transplantation of organs and tissues is allowed only
with the consent of a living donor and, as a rule, with
the consent of the recipient (Article 1). A similar
norm is reflected in the Federal Law No. 323-FZ
dated November 21, 2011 "On the basics of health
protection of the citizens in the Russian Federation.”
In the foreign legal field, the informed consent
model is interpreted within the strictly defined legal
context of the algorithm and is subject to deep
research analysis by the professional community
(Grady, 2017), discussion and popularization in the
field of social and educational work among the
population.
In domestic medical practice, an insufficiently
developed mechanism for implementing the
"presumption of consent” in view of the low
awareness of citizens, generates collisions. Thus,
despite the fact that the procedure for the organization
of the collection of donor organs is regulated by
federal legislation and by the legal and regulatory acts
of the Ministry of Health (orders, instructions, rules),
the issue of the removal of organs and tissues from
the deceased (decedent) donor continues to be acute
and sensitive, both for the close relatives of the
potential donor and for medical workers who,
according to judicial practice, may be accused of
violating the instructions upon the removal
(collection) of an organ if they were not aware of the
will of the deceased or his relatives (see: The
determination of the Constitutional Court of the
Russian Federation in the case of A. Sablina) or
intentionally causing death for the purpose of using
the victim`s organs or tissues.
As evidenced by existing Russian law
enforcement practice, the absence of a request from
medical workers on the expression of will on the issue
of possible donation from relatives of the deceased
and removal by default, in accordance with the
existing presumption of consent, organs and (or)
tissues does not entail criminal liability, which causes
a sharply negative assessment relatives.
The legal professional community is considering
the concept of criminalizing the failure by medical
personnel to inform the victim's relatives about the
planned removal of the donor organ.
Currently, in accordance with the legislation in
force, a physician informs the spouse or other
relatives only about the fact of death, not of the
prospect of organ removal, and expects the donor`s
relatives about their refusal, and if there is no such
person or if it is not possible to contact the relatives
of the deceased within a specified period of time, the
removal of organs is considered possible.
There are no special provisions in the Criminal
Law on the criminal liability of medical personnel for
committing such acts, that is, for violation of the will
of the relatives of the potential (real) donor who
ignores the explicit or unequivocal disagreement of
relatives to the removal (exploitation) of organs.
The proposal under discussion in the legal
community to hold medical personnel criminally
liable for failing to notify relatives about the planned
posthumous organ removal, in our view, does not
have any immediate legislative prospect, since it
legally contradicts to the essence of the presumption
of consent, contained both in the existing legislation
and in the new bill.
It seems that in a situation of acute shortage of
transplants, the legislative substitution of the
“presumption of consent” model by the model of
“requested consent” can also have numerous negative
consequences, at least to cause an increase in cases of
coercion to the remove (collect) organs from living
donors, and will definitely multiply the number and
mortality of citizens in dire need and who have not
waited for transplantation.
The study of law enforcement (judicial) practice
allows us to state a very limited practice of
responding to violations of the current legislation in
this industry, which, of course, cannot testify in favor
of the fact that there are no such violations.
Thus, the analysis of the official statistical
information of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of
Russia, as well as the statistics of convicted persons
in the "Justice" system of the Judicial Department of
the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on cases
related to the trafficking in donor organs, shows zero
indicators in recent years. Moreover, the declared
prohibition on the purchase and sale of human organs
and tissues has not received proper criminal law
support, and there is an obvious legal gap.
A study of criminal legislation showed that the
Criminal Code provides norms on liability for a
number of crimes related to the illegal removal of
human organs and tissues, in particular for:
compulsion to remove human organs or tissues
for transplantation, committed with the use of
Criminal Law Means of Counteracting Illegal Trafficking in Human Organs and Tissues
23
violence or with the threat of its use (Article
120 of the Criminal Code of the Russian
Federation);
purchase or sale of a person... other
transactions with a person performed “in order
to remove organs or tissues from the victim
(clause “g”, part 2 Article 127.1 of the Criminal
Code of the Russian Federation);
murder for the use of organs or tissues of the
victim (clause “m”, part 2, Article 105 of the
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation);
intentional infliction of serious bodily harm,
committed in order to use the organs or tissues
of the victim (clause "g", part 2, Article 111 of
the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).
The study of the above-mentioned crime elements
indicates that the aim, the illegal “removal of the
victim`s organs and tissues” (in human trafficking),
“use of organs or tissues” (in the case of murder or
intentional infliction of serious harm to the victim’s
health) is only qualifying signs of such offences,
which are subject to increased penalties. It is difficult
to characterize the acts and, at the same time, to
identify the elements of trafficking in persons and the
purchase and sale of human organs and tissues, which
are not even provided as a subject of the transaction
(purchase and sale).
In this regard, a paradoxical situation emerges:
currently, the doctrine of medical and criminal law
considers liability for the illegal purchase and sale of
organs, while the Criminal Code does not even
contain a provision on liability for such acts.
In the conditions of a large number of citizens
from the "waiting list" who, for medical reasons, need
to carry out a transplantation operation, an acute
shortage of donor organs and tissues, the absence of
transparent mechanisms for their trafficking, the
presence of obvious legislative gaps, complicating to
identify, qualify and prosecute the perpetrators, all of
this additionally generates "shadow" schemes for
their resolution, contributes to the further expansion
of the clandestine market for "purchase and sale" and
criminal traffic of transplants, the development of
transplantation tourism, fraudulent "mediation", and
in essence and demand of remuneration for the
allegedly prompt delivery or extraordinary receipt of
a deficient organ. All markers and digital traces of
such illegal activities are well traced both in the open
access and in the DARKNET shadow sector.
In this regard, it seems necessary to draw on the
extensive foreign experience, in which the most
common criminal schemes associated with the illegal
transplantation practice and the criminal trafficking in
human organs and tissues are identified and
established (Ambagtsheer, 2016, Broumand, 2017).
Despite a clear lack of developed law enforcement
practice, the real crime picture related to illegal
trafficking, buying and selling of organs is estimated
to be unfavourable, as can be inferred indirectly from
numerous digital “traces” in information and
communication networks.
Thus, in the Russian-language search system
Yandex, the number of requests “buy kidney” (as of
March 2021) was 16 million requests (8,737 shows
per month), “sell a kidney” 3 million requests
(25,000 shows per month) while international and
Russian legislation prohibits such commercial
activities.
In accordance with Article 7of the Federal Law
dated March 13, 2006 38-FZ “On advertising” (as
amended on December 08, 2020), an advertisement
of “human organs and (or) tissues as objects of
purchase and sale” is not allowed (part 4). In the
context of an administrative claim, representatives of
the Prosecutor’s Office repeatedly appealed to the
court for the recognition of information on the
acquisition of donor organs for monetary
remuneration placed on the public Internet prohibited
to distribute and such claims are satisfied by the court.
In regard with the level of public risk associated
with large-scale advertising on the Internet for the
sale and purchase of donor organs, it seems
appropriate to consider the issue of criminalizing such
acts.
Simultaneously with the optimization of the
legislative support for the legal regime of information
about donor organs, it is necessary to strengthen
social and educational activities among the
population (Kovalenko, 2014), including by internal
affairs officers, since the latter are most fully aware
of illegal (i.e. fraudulent) schemes for the trafficking
in donor organs, have the necessary professional
qualifications and skills interact with citizens
(Kochin, 2016).
An attempt to resolve the existing gaps in the legal
regulation of transplant activities and the trafficking
in donor organs was the adoption and discussion of a
new draft law "On donation of human organs and
their transplantation” which is scheduled for adoption
and entry into force in June 2021.
The new draft law that “enshrines the presumption
of consent for posthumous organ donation, the
establishment of a federal register of donors and the
principles of transplantation services, however, as
rightly emphasized during the discussion, the issue of
a unified Federal register of people ready for
posthumous donation, as well as patients, who need
CLOSA 2021 - VII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “CRIMINAL LAW AND OPERATIVE SEARCH
ACTIVITIES: PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATION, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE”
24
organ transplantation, how and where the decision of
people who refuse posthumous donation will be
recorded, where and how donor organs are received
has not yet been resolved. It is obvious that any "non-
transparency" in the solution of these issues creates
additional preconditions for their abuse in the course
of transplantation activities.
In this regard, it is also proposed to use a foreign
algorithm for organizing and distributing donor
organs, taking into account utility and fairness
(Schulte, 2018).
Transplantation of human organs and tissues is a
high-tech type of medical care and it is obvious that
medical manipulations can be carried out by highly
qualified specialists, and the support of such activities
should have powerful financial support.
By the order of the Ministry of Health of the
Russian Federation No. 365 dated June 04, 2019 (as
amended on November 09, 2020) "On the approval of
the departmental target program "Organ donation and
transplantation in the Russian Federation", the goals
and objectives of the departmental target program
were announced, in accordance with which medical
assistance by the method of transplantation
(transplants) of human organs will be able to receive
more than 15 thousand citizens, including children.
However, as foreign experience has shown, the
implementation of the national transplantation
program can significantly reduce, but not stop, the
illegal practice associated, in particular, with
transplant tourism (Ratkovic, 2018).
In this regard, legislative issues related to the
responsibility of the subjects of such activities and the
prevention of abuse should be resolved.
On the basis of international imperatives and
norms of Russian legislation, which directly prohibit
the commercialization of medical activities in
transplantation and trafficking in donor organs, taking
into account the problems of law enforcement
practice in identifying, investigating, qualifying and
prosecuting of perpetrators, criminologically based
forecasts of a sharp demand for donor organs and an
increase in the need for transplantation operations
under the impact of the negative consequences of the
coronavirus pandemic COVID-19, it seems
reasonable to apply a comprehensive approach, which
should include: optimization of the legal regulation of
medical activities in donor organ transplantation,
improvement of the criminal legal provision to
counteract the illegal trafficking in human organs and
tissues and the commercialization of transplant
medical manipulations, wider use of operational
search methods to detect criminal offenses, including
the use of information and communication
technologies, prosecution of perpetrators,
intensification of social and educational work with
the population in order to popularize knowledge and
awareness of the social value of organ donation and
risks (threats) participation in illegal schemes.
The mechanism of criminal law response to the
socially dangerous acts prohibited in legislation on
the transplantation and illegal trafficking in human
organs and tissues should include the optimal
criminal law instruments to protect citizens from the
criminal offences under consideration and to
prosecute those responsible.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The norms presented in Russian legislation
prohibiting the illegal trafficking in human organs
and tissues, as well as the commercialization of
transplant medicine, are more declarative in nature
and should be accompanied by standards, specifically
provided for in the criminal law.
In this regard, the authors consider it necessary to
submit for discussion a list of socially dangerous acts
that should be criminalized, including:
purchase and sale of human organs and tissues,
other transactions with donor organs for the
transplantation purposes;
purchase and sale of human organs and tissues not
specified in the transplant list of the Ministry of
Health of the Russian Federation as transplantation
objects;
removal (exteriorization) of organs and (or)
tissues after receiving information that the deceased
and (or) his relatives disagree with the removal of
organs and(or) tissues for transplantation, or willfully
ignoring it.
removal (exteriorization), procurement,
conservation, storage, traffic of transplants,
transplantation of human organs and (or) tissues in
organizations and institutions outside the (list) system
of State and municipal health-care institutions,
established by law;
illegal removal of human organs and (or) tissues
for the purpose of conducting experiments, ritual and
religious ceremonies;
repeated advertising of human organs and (or)
tissues as objects of sale and purchase in the mass
media and/or placement and distribution in the
information and communication network Internet of
information declared prohibited in accordance with
the current legislation;
Criminal Law Means of Counteracting Illegal Trafficking in Human Organs and Tissues
25
Maintenance of records, registers, coordination of
“waiting list”, transplantation logistics by
commercial institutions, including medical profiles;
In the context of the unprecedented development
of the coronavirus pandemic, which has exposed a
large-scale threat to the health of the country's
multimillion population and the normal functioning
of the entire health care system, the issues of
improving the legal provision of life and health of
citizens and their criminal legal protection from
unlawful encroachments are a priority task of the
state. In this regard, the recognition of the
humanitarian value essence of transplantation of
human organs and tissues for medical reasons and the
noble mission of gratuitous donation of donor organs
in order to save the recipient's life should form the
basis of state policy in resolving legal, administrative,
medical, ethical problems of domestic
transplantation.
REFERENCES
Gautier, S.V., 2020. Solid organ transplant within the novel
COVID-19 coronavirus infection pandemic. In the
Bulletin of Transplantology and Artificial Organs.
22(3). pp. 6-7.
Grishin, D. A., Khomyakova, M. А., 2018. The criminal
law aspect of the sale and purchase of human organs
and tissues. In the Criminal Law journal. 4. pp. 68-71.
Kovalenko, V. I., Seryi, F. G., 2014. Criminal and
criminological problems of modern transplantation of
human organs and tissues. In the Society and Law
journal. 4(50). pp. 108-112.
Kochin, A. A., Sharukhin, A. P., 2016. Service etiquette in
the activities of internal affairs officers. In the training
manual. ST.P.: PUBLISHING HOUSE: ST.
PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY OF THE MINISTRY
OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF RUSSIA.
Nosanenko, G. Yu., Gavrilyuk, R. V., 2019.
Transplantation of human organs and tissues: problems
and solutions. In the International Research Journal.
2(80).
Popova, T. V., Sergeev, A. B., 2018. Criminal activity in
the provision of medical care in the field of surgery
(transplantation of human organs and (or) tissues): legal
and victimological aspect. In the Viktimologia journal.
1(15). pp. 69-75.
Schulte, K., 2018. Analysis of the Eurotransplant Kidney
Allocation Algorithm: How Should We Balance Utility
and Equity? In Transplantation Proceedings. 50(10).
pp. 3010-3016.
Ambagtsheer, F., 2016. Organ Trade: Knowledge,
Awareness, and Nonlegislative Responses. In
Transplantation. 100(1). pp. 5-6.
Broumand, B., 2017. New Definition of Transplant
Tourism. In International journal of organ
transplantation medicine. 8(1). pp. 49–51.
Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation,
“Organ Donation and Transplantation Activities 2014”.
http://www.transplant-observatory.org.
Global Financial Integrity, 2017.
http://www.gfintegrity.org.
Ratkovic, M., 2018. Development of the National
Transplant Program Has Significantly Decreased but
Not Ended Transplant Tourism in Montenegro. In
Transplantation Processing. 50(5). pp. 1236-1237.
Grady, C., 2017. Informed Consent. In the New England
Journal of Medicine. 376(9). pp. 856-876.
Gonzalez, J., Garijo, I., Sanchez, A., 2020. Organ
Trafficking and Migration: A Bibliometric Analysis of
an Untold Story. In J Environ Res Public Health. 17(9).
p. 3204. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Transnational Crime and the Developing World. Channing,
2017. Global Financial Integrity. https://gfintegrity.org.
Transplants source: Global Observatory on Donation and
Transplantation See Appendix, Section C for a list of
sources for retail prices. In Global Observatory on
Donation and Transplantation, “Organ Donation and
Transplantation Activities 2014”.
http://www.transplant-observatory.org.
CLOSA 2021 - VII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “CRIMINAL LAW AND OPERATIVE SEARCH
ACTIVITIES: PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATION, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE”
26