successful experience of Great Britain (Nam,
Nguyen, Nguyen & Luu, 2020), USA ( Gorshunov,
Armenakis, Harris & Walker, 2021; Posthuma, 2021;
Liu, Liu, Ullah, Wei & Hu, 2021), China (Yang, Ma
& Cui, 2021) and a number of European countries
(Brzic, Dabic, Kukura & Podobnik , 2021; Ferris,
Hanousek & Tresl, 2021). At the same time, the
successful anti-corruption practices of individual
states do not cancel out such indisputable statements
as that today there is no global consensus on what
“corruption” is and that things that are considered to
be “illegal corruption” in one country are recognized
as a legitimate business practice in another (Bandeira,
2013).
In modern conditions, business representatives, in
an effort to avoid compliance risks (that is, regulatory
risks that arise for an organization as a result of losses
due to non-compliance with legislation), create
compliance management systems. They represent
internal controls over compliance with legal and
corporate anti-bribery requirements. They are usually
based on various guidelines proposed by regulators
and non-governmental organizations (Kobets &
Krasnova, 2020).
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this article, we present a systematic review of
documents developed by nongovernmental
associations and literature that investigates
corruption, identifying the factors of corruption in
business and other economic activities. To search for
relevant studies, we used Scimagojr, Research Gate,
Science Direct, Google Scholar, Sage Open.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Corruption risks in business. Currently, the risks
associated with corrupt practices are a growing
concern for both large and small companies, which
face demands to take bribes, both from their
competitors acting in a corrupt manner and from their
own employees who violate established codes of
conduct.
Increased enforcement of bribery laws abroad,
record-breaking fines, and the threat of criminal
penalties for directors and employees (Zhesterov,
2020) are prompting executives to consider how to
step up their anti-corruption efforts. In addition, in
modern conditions, the pressure on business is
increasing more and more from socially responsible
investment funds and indices, which add criteria for
assessing the fight against bribery to their selection
procedures almost every year. Development banks
and export credit agencies are increasingly imposing
prohibitive sanctions on companies that are known to
be involved in corruption. As a result, the
management of most companies understands the need
to protect and promote their reputation for integrity,
since not only business partners, but also society as a
whole becomes less tolerant of corruption.
Business principles of anti-bribery. In today's
environment, companies have the opportunity to
respond positively to growing corruption risks and
mitigate threats with robust anti-corruption policies.
To help companies develop and implement effective
anti-bribery policies, international organizations such
as Transparency International (TI) and Social
Accountability International (SAI) have joined forces
to launch Business Principles for Countering Bribery.
The development of these principles, which can be
introduced into business and other economic
activities, was carried out with the participation of
many stakeholders in cooperation and with the
support of a Steering Committee, which included
representatives of the international business
community, academia, trade unions and other non-
governmental organizations.
Business Principles nowadays play the role of a
code of good anti-bribery practice for many
companies. They have influenced many local anti-
corruption codes, tools and guidelines. Their
introduction has stimulated the development of other
similar anti-bribery codes. Multinational companies
and researchers now look to them as a benchmark.
For example, ENKA's Code of Corporate Conduct
states that the company has adopted the principle of
“zero tolerance for bribery” and is committed to abide
by the relevant laws, rules and principles in its
“Global Business” section.
Global PACI initiative. At the beginning of the
third decade of the 21st century, the Partnering
Against Corruption Initiative (hereinafter, PACI) has
become the leading platform for discussing anti-
corruption issues in the private sector. PACI is based
on anti-bribery principles, which are the product of
the work of a target group created by member
companies of the World Economic Forum (World
Economic Forum, hereinafter referred to as WEF)
[11, p. 8]. Discussion of the corruption agenda takes
place at the WEF’s annual meetings, based in
Cologny, canton of Geneva, Switzerland. The WEF
mission is worded as an aspiration to improve the
state of the world. The Forum provides a platform for
businesses, governments and civil society to work
together on numerous projects and initiatives. WEF