shares in investment funds is carried out by the Bank
of Japan to support financial markets and stimulate
the economy. The bank purchases shares in Japanese
mutual funds (ETFs) and real estate investment trusts
(REITs).
Researchers agree that the effectiveness of the use
of any single instrument (change in the key rate,
acquisition of assets) separately will have a weak
effect, therefore a combination of instruments is
important in order to achieve synergy, which will give
a more pronounced effect. A side effect of
unconventional instruments is the permanent growth
of central bank balance sheets. When new monetary
policy mechanisms were launched during the World
Financial Crisis, central banks believed that balance
sheet expansion would be short-term. Attempts to
reduce the balance caused pressure on the stock
market. The presence of securities on the bank's
balance sheet purchased under QE limits its ability to
increase the base rate, which can be raised only after
the reserves are cleared. The acquisition by central
banks of assets other than government bonds (for
example, the acquisition of corporate bonds, ETFs,
and REITs by the Bank of Japan) inevitably increases
the risks associated with owning such assets. Asset
inflation, expressed in the growth of the stock market
and real estate prices, carries risks of stability of the
financial system in the long term.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The growing risk of a liquidity trap in a near-zero rate
environment reinforces the importance of joint
implementation of monetary and fiscal policy
measures to preserve jobs and economic activity.
However, the unified policy is more inert due to its
bureaucracy, as it requires the introduction and the
adoption of bills. At the same time, a time lag for the
implementation of measures is laid in the final result,
therefore, when developing measures, it makes sense
to use a set of tools that give less effect, but require
less time for their adoption. At the same time, both
the composition of the instruments and their influence
on the final result change. If in conditions of positive
interest rates the main task was to increase the supply
by stimulating the production of goods and services,
then in conditions of zero interest rates the main task
is to increase the demand. Stimulating the production
of goods and services becomes counterproductive,
carrying a disinflationary effect. In these conditions,
tax deductions for the modernization of equipment by
legal entities, or the purchase of certain goods by
individuals, have a positive effect. The state creates
demand through infrastructure projects or military
spending. The increase in the workload increases the
supply in the labor market, which leads to the
decrease in total wages. Because of this, the aggregate
demand decreases, twisting a deflationary spiral.
Changes in the marginal costs of producers associated
with falling commodity prices or changes in taxation
also affect the bottom line. By laying down price cuts
in the future, the manufacturer creates disinflationary
expectations. If, within the framework of fiscal
measures to overcome the crisis, a reduction in
income taxation is envisaged, then the negative
effects are eliminated with the help of QE.
REFERENCES
Arkadeva, O. G., Berezina, N. V., 2021. State Financial
Risk Management. In The Context of The Fourth
Industrial Revolution. In International Conference on
Finance, Entrepreneurship and Technologies in Digital
Economy.
Arkadeva, O. G., Berezina, N. V., 2019. Theoretical basis
of state participation in the risk assessment of social
development. In European Proceedings of Social and
Behavioural Sciences. LXXVII. pp. 557-564.
Benigno, G., Benigno, P., 2006. Designing targeting rules
for international monetary policy cooperation. In
Journal of Monetary Economics. 53(3). pp. 473-506.
Blanchard, O. J., Leigh, D., 2013. Growth Forecast Errors
and Fiscal Multipliers. In American Economic Review.
103. pp. 117-120.
Cao, J., Illing, G., 2019. Money: Theory and Practice. In
Springer International Publishing.
Corsetti, G., Dedola, L., Leduc, S., 2010. Optimal Monetary
Policy in Open Economies. In Handbook of Monetary
Economics. 3(16). pp. 861-933.
Fajgelbaum, P., Khandelwal, A., 2016. Measuring the
Unequal Gains from Trade. In The Quarterly Journal of
Economics. 131 (3). pp. 1113-1180.
Goodhart, Ch., Pradhan, M., 2020. The Great Demographic
Reversal. Ageing Societies, Waning Inequality, and an
Inflation Revival. In Palgrave Macmillan.
Gopinath, G., Stein, J. C., 2021. Banking, Trade, and the
Making of a Dominant Currency. In The Quarterly
Journal of Economics.
Gourinchas, P.-O., Rey, H., Sauzet, M., 2019. The
International Monetary and Financial System. In
Annual Review of Economics.
Petrakis, P. E., 2020. Theoretical Approaches to Economic
Growth and Development. An Interdisciplinary
Perspective. In Palgrave Macmillan.
Vercelli, A., 2019. Finance and Democracy. Towards a
Sustainable Financial System. In Palgrave Macmillan.