the economy, directing free financial resources of
enterprises and the population into the domestic
economy, including investment purposes. A sharp
decline in the share of lending, including investment
lending, in active banking operations and an increase
in income from speculative operations negatively
affect the economic security of the state. However,
given the significant growth in the banking sector's
profits, we can speak of an increase in the security
potential of the financial sector of the economy with
the existing assessment methods. Thus, the
strategically wrong accents and the infrastructure
system begins to work for itself, in spite of its
intended role in the national security system. Taking
into account the requirements for building a security
system in the state, there is a conflict: the goals (tasks)
of a lower level (specific market participants) begin
to conflict with the goals of a higher (national) level.
Only the state can correct this situation, having
clearly defined the target guidelines for building a
system of economic security of economic entities.
Another component of the problems is the
assessment of economic security at the micro-level.
This issue is natural, since the process of making
decisions on ensuring economic security begins with
the diagnostic stage. Its effectiveness is determined
by the methodological approaches and techniques
that the analyst uses in this activity.
At present, with a wide variety of methods for
diagnosing economic security systems of economic
entities, the main application is methods of indicator
assessment. Within this approach, the main questions
are about the indicators used for diagnostic purposes
and their thresholds. The most commonly used
indicators are for assessing the financial condition
and use of financial resources. According to some
authors (Sergeeva, 2019, Karanina, Ryazanova,
Gritsuk, 2018, Klychova, Zakirova, Dyatlova,
Klychova, Zaugarova, Zalyalova, 2019), the most
preferred indicators are for assessing liquidity,
financial stability, turnover and profitability. On the
basis of partial deviations from the threshold values,it
is possible to get an integral indicator, while
researchers offer different approaches to determining
the weight coefficients (scores) that define the
contribution of each indicator to the overall
assessment of the level of economic security
(Azarenko, 2017).
Another common approach to assessing the level
of economic security is the approach tested in risk
management technology. The variety of methods
existing here can be summarized by qualitative and
quantitative interpretation of risks. Some authors
propose a methodology for integral risk assessment,
where the materiality of risk is taken as a weighting
indicator (Aleksandrov, 2019). There are other
approaches to assessing the level of economic
security: an integrated approach that basically
combines an indicator approach and an approach
based on risk diagnostics; bankruptcy diagnostics and
others.
However, practical experience with various
methods does not give the analyst satisfying results.
The main reasons of it are the following. First of all,
such a widespread approach requires an objective
selection of evaluation criteria for the organization's
activities in the safety mode, and a set of indicators
that determine each of the criteria. It is simply
illogical to use here standard approaches without
taking into account the specifics of the organization's
activities. But the problem is associated with the
threshold values of indicators, which, in some cases,
should have a completely different meaning than the
generally accepted one. For example, the autonomy
coefficient for trade enterprises, and in some cases, it
is simply impossible to establish threshold
(normative) values. However, from a methodological
point of view, the described situation is even more
problematic.
For the stage of assessing the actual state of the
economic security of an enterprise, using the
indicator method is extremely convenient. It
determines its widespread distribution. There are also
information bases that allow to get the initial
information. Its users can be third parties interested in
the assessment, for example, creditors. But after all,
analysis and assessment is the basis for planning, in
this case based on a system of indicators.
Unfortunately, in the practice of domestic enterprises,
such planning often leads to "technocratic methods of
correcting the values of indicators", substituting
tactical decisions for the strategy of forming a system
of economic security. Moreover, taking into account
the frequency of forming credentials, the safety
management process is more reminiscent of episodic
decisions of a spontaneous nature to bring individual
security subsystems into a stable state. Considering
that the balance sheet data is a state of the
organization on a specific date, which does not reflect
the actual dynamics in the development of the system,
it is necessary to switch to assessing the dynamics of
indicators. It is also advisable for domestic
enterprises to select those indicators which help to
more clearly assess the state of security. Each
industry needs its own threshold values of indicators,
since the goal is to achieve an optimal level of safety.
In the next section of the article, we substantiate these
proposals giving an example of the financial