At the same time, agricultural raw materials and
products that could be produced and processed in
their own agro-industrial complex were imported
(Kuznetsova, 1991)
The search for ways to solve the problem by
attracting even more funds didn't pan out. More than
200 billion rubles were allocated to agriculture in the
70s of the XX century. There was no growth in labor
productivity and agricultural production (Razuvaeva,
1989).
The Soviet system, possessing command and
administrative features of the leadership, led to the
strong horizontal ties in the functioning of the All-
Union Fund of Agricultural Products. The major task
was the centralized concentration of agricultural
products in state hands. The process of collecting,
preserving, processing and bringing agricultural raw
materials and food to the consumer was deprived of
spontaneity. As a result, the interests of neither
producers nor consumers could be taken into account.
By the end of the 80s. of the XX century, the
centralized distribution order acquired a paradoxical
practice: food products concentrated in the capital and
regional centers were spontaneously bought up by the
population coming from numerous provinces. The
material costs were obvious. Products grown in
personal subsidiary plots were used mainly locally,
by the villagers themselves (Kuznetsova, 1991).
During this period, there were different models of
self-sufficiency of the country's residents with food,
which were formed in the regions of the country.
Characteristics of the Omsk model that emerged in
the second half of the 70s. of the XX century,
provides an opportunity to trace the inconsistency of
its functioning, successes and shortcomings, results,
as well as its elements in the modern agro-industrial
complex of the region on a single example.
The inconsistency of the self-sufficiency system
is primarily associated with regional production
imbalances and natural and climatic conditions that
affect the limitation or vice versa of the package of
food produced. On the other hand, a condition for
employment of both rural and urban populations and
an increase in their well-being was created in the long
term (Safin, 2009).
The Omsk model of self-sufficiency in food for
the population was based on the simultaneous
development of personal subsidiary plots (private
household plots), household plots (subsidiary plots)
of enterprises, and gardening associations of urban
residents. Personal subsidiary farms of rural workers
were considered as the main supplier of vegetable,
meat, and dairy food for the residents of the region.
Subsidiary farming of enterprises determined the
expansion of the range and the reduction in the food
cost for workers. Gardening partnerships also solved
humanitarian functions: surplus vegetables were
transferred to social institutions.
A combination of administrative and economic
regulation in the self-sufficiency system was found in
the region, a favorable structure of land holdings had
a positive effect (the presence of a sufficient number
of sown areas for grain and fodder crops was higher
in percentage terms than in the country, for example,
for grain by 4.6%). As a result of this activity, meat
consumption in the Omsk region was 5.6% higher
(Safin, 2009).
The food problem was also solved by creating
household plots at the enterprises. Their contribution
to the development of the food supply of the regions
was insignificant, and the cost of production was
high. For example, in 1981, the household plots of the
enterprises of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist
Republic produced an average of 1.4 kg of meat per
urban resident. There was some difference by region:
in the Altai Territory - 1.33 kg, in the Tyumen Region
- 3.4 kg, in the Tomsk Region - 1.5 kg, in the
Novosibirsk Region - 1.27 kg, in the Kemerovo
Region - 0.7 kg, in the Omsk Region. - 2.98 kg of
meat (Orlov, 2015).
Omsk region has created 151 subsidiary farms.
And although their food production was reflected
only in improving the diversity and quality of food for
employees of enterprises – this fact should not be
underestimated. Gardening associations specialized
in the cultivation of vegetables and fruits, and 15% of
the urban dwellers were engaged in this production.
The current model of self-sufficiency of the
population with food in the regions, including in the
Omsk region, remains relevant at the present time.
The Omsk Region has a developed agro-industrial
complex, which ranks second among Siberian regions
and is in the top ten among the leading agricultural
regions of the Russian Federation (Aleshchenko &
Kryukova, 2017).
In the post-Soviet period in the Omsk region there
were: 280 joint-stock companies, 41 agricultural
cooperatives, 23 state organizations, 31 collective
farms continued to work, 7272 peasant farms were
created. The agricultural sector was in the most
difficult situation during the first post-Soviet decade.
The removal of the state from the role of the main
regulator of the country's economic processes, the
price dispute between agricultural and industrial
goods and services in the country were the main
reasons for this phenomenon (Borovskikh, 2004).
As the researcher Rudik (2021) notes: the basis for
the provision of the food market of the Omsk region