Osmanova, Yachmenev, 2020) and digital platforms
(Belyakova, Belyakov, Fokina, Shpak, 2020;
Gribanov, Bezrukova, 2018).
In order to develop the stability management of
nonlinear functioning of industrial enterprises, the
task is to ensure the use of poorly formalized source
information and algorithms of fuzzy sets in
management technology, which opens up the
possibility of saturating it with valuable knowledge
about the properties of enterprise behavior in the face
of increasing threats. As a result, it is possible to
increase the information transparency of decision-
making environment and the adaptability of industrial
enterprise by responding to emerging risks in advance
by maneuvering its resources.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
In the range of natural-scientific and economic views
on the stability of motion of dynamic systems, the
achievement of study goal is achieved by attracting
the ideas of systems analysis, cybernetics, nonlinear
dynamics, catastrophe theory and information theory.
Thanks to application in the complex of these
concepts and methodological principles, it becomes
possible to perform an information analysis of
metamorphosis of nonlinear activity of an industrial
enterprise, the bizarre combinations of stable and
unstable phases of its functioning.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Conceptually, it became undeniable that with the
“jump into the market” on the transformation of
domestic enterprises was extremely powerful
pressure of overwhelming economic dynamics,
coming from the reformers' plan of rapid
denationalization and privatization of the property of
economic complexes. Obviously, the orthodoxy of
monetarism left no other levers to manage the
transition processes except free pricing and money
supply regulation, which against the background of
radicalization of institutional change caused an
unprecedented steepness of the processes caused by
them.
Chaotization of the economic space has become
an inevitable consequence not only of structural
discontinuities, among which the network irregularity
of input and output commodity flows and interactions
with counterparties, but also of the confusion with the
economic activity rules.
Meanwhile, it is theoretically argued and
practically confirmed that in a highly disturbed
environment, replete with critical overloads and
burdened by the lack of effective government
support, the work of industrial enterprises was
shackled by fading or arrhythmia of supply of
consumed resources (raw materials, materials,
energy, products, etc.), a shortage of their own
financial funds, uncertainty of partnerships, demand
for manufactured products and their supply. The
undermined reproduction of the enterprises' resources
resulted in the containment, or even the damping of
business activity, a sharp drop in output and sales, the
exorbitant growth of debts and the risk of bankruptcy.
The commodity-money imbalance and turbulence
of the transitive Russian economy gave rise to critical
transition processes and, with the liberalization of
pricing, inflationary waves running over each other
and the entrenchment of depressive tendencies.
Shocks of supply and demand, as a reaction to the
shocks of the country's deformed economic complex,
rocked its financial and economic mechanism and
condemned enterprises to exhaustion and depletion of
resources. Within the framework of monetarism
postulates, which ignored the methods of state
regulation, there was no need to rely on the damping
and repayment of the prohibitive “bursts” of inflation
(Chuprov, 2017).
The dynamic picture of the enterprise functioning
is undergoing restructuring, closing the slow and fast,
smooth and “explosive” phases of behavior. In
particular, during the evolution of enterprise, its state
of stable equilibrium may merge with an unstable
equilibrium, after which the equilibrium disappears
and the enterprise economic system radically changes
mode, making a leap (a “catastrophe” occurs).
Phenomena of this kind are studied and described
by catastrophe theory, in which a dynamic system
loses stability of an equilibrium state due to both
bifurcation of this state and a spontaneous process
(Arnold, 1990). Moreover, with the loss of
equilibrium state, the system either moves to another
equilibrium, or two such states appear: stable and
unstable equilibrium.
It would appear that this scenario of industrial
enterprise's transformation is inherent in the first
stage of its slide into crisis, when under the influence
of perturbations, the enterprise is gradually
“squeezed” out of a stable equilibrium and over time
it weakens and disappears. After that, the perturbed
mode of enterprise's functioning evolves to another
equilibrium state, different from the previous
equilibrium. The enterprise is drawn into the process
of disintegration and deterioration of resource