occupation of the head of the household, monthly
income, household size, knowledge of maternal
nutrition. The results of the analysis of household
social characteristics show that the highest education
level for the head of household is SMA/SMK at
46.5%, the mother's education is SMA/SMK 34.7%.
The work of the head of household is mostly
owned by the respondents, namely employees by
41.7%. This is in line with the research of Utami and
Sisca (2015) in Bogor, West Java, most heads of
households have an employee job of 46.2% (Utami &
KP, 2015). According to Baliwati et al. (2015) that
the economic status of a household is determined by
the type of work (Baliwati, Briawan, & Melani,
2015). Heads of poor households who live in urban
areas are more likely to have status as laborers/
employees/ employees/ others. In addition, the heads
of poor households in rural areas tend to work in the
agricultural sector (Sugiyarto, Mulyo, & Seleky,
2015).
The variable age of the head of the household is at
most 30-49 years old at
61.8%. Most of the age of the
head of the household belongs to the middle age
group. The characteristics of the monthly income of
the head of the household are seen from the Poverty
Line. In Karawang Regency the average respondent
is included in the non-poor household with a high-
income category of 86.1%. According to Rachman
and Supriyati (2005), the income level in rural areas
is much lower than the income level in urban areas
(Rachman & Supriyati, 2005). When a household is
in the poor category, it will be constrained in meeting
food needs because of limited income which leads to
hunger and food insecurity (Damayanti, 2018).
Income affects food security (Shisanya &
Mafongoya, 2016); (Herawati, Ginting, Asngari,
Susanto, & Puspotawati, 2011); (Mohammadi, et al.,
2011); (Shoae, Omidvar, & ghazi-tabatabaie, 2007).
The characteristic of household size is mostly owned
by respondents, namely 3-4 people in one family by
66%. This is in line with Ashari's research (2017),
most households fall into the small household
category of 82.4%. This is in line with what (Olaniyi
A., 2014) stated that household size is related to
household income. High-income households tend to
have small household sizes and vice versa (Olaniyi
A., 2014). The characteristics of the nutritional
knowledge of mothers who answered correctly were
mostly on the question of the definition of nutritious
food, namely 86.1%. According to
Yuliana et al.
(2013) knowledge of nutrition of housewives has a
positive effect on household food security (Yuliana,
Zakaria, & Adawiyah, 2013).
4.2 The Relationship between Food
Security and Stunting Incidents in
0-23 Months Children
The results of the data show that households with
severe food insecurity have 33.3% stunting children,
while food insecure households have 32.6% stunting
children. Based on statistical tests, there is no
significant relationship between household food
security and the incidence of stunting as shown by the
results of the Spearman correlation test (p>0.05). The
results of the study (Saaka et al. 2014) a study
conducted in Northern Ghana stated that there was no
relationship between the nutritional status index
(stunting) and household food security. This study
also states that household food security is not a
sensitive indicator for children under 2 years of age
(Saaka, 2014). Emiyas and Mengistie's research
(2017) reveals that there is no relationship between
food security and stunting, because malnourished
children are children whose nutritional status is poor
as a result of inadequate care and poor child health,
not only in terms of food. Emiyas and Mengistie's
research findings (2017) point to the fact that food
security is a necessary but not sufficient condition to
ensure good nutritional status (Mulu & Mengistie,
2017).
According to research (Spiro et al. 2010) in
Kailali Nepal stated that there is no significant
relationship between food security and the incidence
of stunting, because not only food access affects
stunting but also family socioeconomic welfare, low
birth weight, infectious diseases and diarrhea,
hygiene and sanitation, mother's education, mother's
knowledge about optimal nutrition
, non-exclusive
breastfeeding parenting, incomplete immunization
status (Osei, et al., 2010).
5 CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the research and discussion in
the previous chapter, the researcher can conclude that
there is no significant relationship between household
food security and stunting. The prevalence of stunting
under two children was mostly found in food insecure
households, namely 33.3%, while stunting children
under five in food insecure households was 32.6%
The
prevalence of stunting under children aged 0-24
months in Sukaluyu and Srikamulyan Villages,
Karawang Regency is 33.3%.