Month and Date
1 1965 7.26-8.7 13 0.17 0.07 0.08 46
2 1968 7.18-8.13 44 0.41 0.18 0.15 36
3 1978 5.25-6.16 23 15.49 9.44 6.00 38
4 1979 10.3-10.21 19 8.31 5.43 2.84 33
5 1988 8.3-9.8 33 8.29 4.94 3.29 38
6 1990 7.29-8.10 13 0.59 0.25 0.32 43
7 2013 7.11-7.19 9 0.24 0.05 0.17 53
The initial loss rate of medium and small water
(upstream inflow less than 100 million m
3
) in
Xinle~Beiguocun is 35%~55%, which concentrated
in 40%~50%. The initial loss rate of large water is
30%~40%.
The initial loss rate of medium and small water in
each reach is higher, more than 30%, and the initial
loss rate of large water is lower than that of medium
and small water. In Yuecheng~Caixiaozhuang
section, the initial loss rate of all-range water is lower
than that of the other two typical sections. The initial
loss rate of medium and small water in
Huangbizhuang reservoir~Beizhongshan is higher
than that in Xinle~Beiguocun, while that of large
water is lower than that in Xinle~Beiguocun.
5 CONCLUSIONS
In North China (Haihe River Basin as an example):
(1) The upstream inflow is negatively correlated
with the leakage rate per unit river length, and when
the upstream inflow increases to a certain value, the
leakage rate per unit river length tends to be stable; he
leakage loss rate increases along the river course.
There is a negative correlation between water
duration and leakage rate per unit river length when
there is bottom water.
(2) The dryness degree of river channel is one of
the main factors affecting the seepage capacity.
(3) The leakage rate per unit river length is
generally logarithmic or exponential related to the
upstream inflow. Through the optimal curve fitting,
the formula for calculating the leakage rate per unit
length of each typical reach is obtained by given
upstream inflow.
(4) The initial loss rate of medium and small water
in each typical reach is higher, more than 30%, and
the initial loss rate of large water is lower than that of
medium and small water.
This study has innovatively put forward the law of
channel leakage in North China (Haihe River Basin
as an example). The research results have strong
practicability and could really guide the practical
work including flood prediction, evaluation of river
recharge groundwater, etc.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the National Key R&D
Program of China (Grant No., 2018YFE0106500).
REFERENCES
Boroughs, C. B., & Abt, S. R. (2003). Water losses along
a reach of the Pecos River in New Mexico. Journal of
the American Water Resources Association, 39(6),
1457-1464.
Grebenyukov, P. G. (2002). The Choice of Optimal Model
for Calculating Seepage Losses from Channels and
Rivers. Water Resources, 29(5), 510-517.
Lu, S. Y. (2009). Analysis of channel seepage
characteristics in piedmont plain of Hebei province.
Engineering Geology, 12(45), 115-118.
Qin, J. T. (1989). Study on channel leakage model of hebei
plain by hydrology method. Hydrogeological
Engineering, 13, 5-9.
Sun, T. W., Li, Z. X., & Qi, W. W. (2010). Analysis and
study on the law of seepage in the main stream of
Liaohe River. Technology Information, 10, 754-755.
Zhang, Y. Z., Yin, J. L., & Cui, X. D. (2002). Analysis and