been affecting us for more than a year, the question
that most scientists and general public would want
answers for is how long such epidemic would persist
and more radically. Would it ever end? So several
SIR models were created in order to find an answer
to this question using ordinary differential equations
to simulate the progress of COVID-19 in several
countries with data from the website of the World
Health Organization, and a prediction of the trend of
development of the disease was finally successfully
made.
Thus, the knowledge of compartmental models
and SIR model in particular provided a useful tool to
analyze the disease and predict number of people
would be infected and how long the disease would
last. However, it is unsettling that the results tended
to support the idea that COVID-19 may not end
worldwide when predicting using the SIR model
(Merchant, 2020). Such prediction is extremely
important in that epidemiologists and health
scientists could focus on how to deal with this
disease in a long-term fashion, and not as an
emergent outbreak anymore. Also, general public
would need to realize that COVID would eventually
just be like flu and common cold, and they need to
take action like vaccinate and wear masks as well in
order to cope with this disease.
2 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
Fig. 1 below showed what a typical SIR model would
look like. The blue, red, and green lines represent
susceptible (S), infected (I), and recovered (R)
individuals as time evolves. In the short term, we
would assume that S+I+R would equal a fixed
number, N, the total population size. In other words,
it means that the whole population in a given area
would be divided into the three groups as identified.
However, when it comes to longer terms like several
months or years, it would not be so accurate to
assume that these are the only three groups that
existed. For example, in the case of COVID-19,
millions of people died after infection. Although it is
rare for people to be infected again and thus
susceptible after recovery, several people did show
signs of infection after recovery, and in this case it
might be better to use SIS model. But for purposes of
simplicity, most epidemiologists assume for a SIR
model at the initial stages of research.
Figure 1: SIR Model.
As we can see in the diagram, the red line, or the
infected individuals, has a right skewed distribution,
which means that the disease can be highly infectious
because people infect quickly at first, but it takes
time to recover, so the infected amount would
decrease with a smaller rate than the increasing rate.
And as assumed by the model, once infected
individuals are recovered, they would not be
susceptible to the disease again, so when no one is
susceptible to the disease, the epidemic or pandemic
is considered to be finished (Bailey, 1975). A typical
example would be the spread of COVID-19 in China,
as shown below (Fig. 2). It is easy to see that by the
time 100, which roughly corresponds to 220 days
after the first case, the red curve shows no sign of
increasing anymore and roughly no more infected
individuals present. It is then safe to say that COVID-
19, in a short period of time, would not surge in
China again (Yang et al., 2020).
Figure 2: COVID-19 Spread in China.
However, China might be one of the few cases
that would show a sign of ending COVID-19. For
example, Fig. 3, 4, and 5 below show the change of
infected population over time in the United States of
America, Spain, and Vietnam respectively. In the
case of the United States, we can see that there are
multiple peaks in the graph, which would correspond
to multiple SIR models. However, if we split the full
graph into several models, we would discover that
each SIR model does not indicate a full recovery. In