Therefore, they should increase the performance
evaluation scores of weak projects to improve the
overall ranking. The lower-ranked cities J, G, F, and
K have a low correlation coefficient in the funds
execution rate. Therefore, they should regulate the
use of funds to increase the execution rate, in order to,
improve the overall ranking. City H has the lowest
correlation coefficient in Category B and Category C
projects, so, it is necessary to focus on rectification
and reform of these two categories of projects, in
order to improve the comprehensive ranking.
5 SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Optimizing Budget Allocation, and
Improving the Index System
A reasonable budget allocation and a comprehensive
performance evaluation index system are the basis for
improving the funds execution rate and project
performance evaluation scores, and are the key
factors to improve the quality of performance
evaluation. In terms of budget allocation, the
department in charge of TCM projects should strictly
follow the principles of overall planning, fairness and
justice (Huo 2021), and allocate project budgets in
accordance with areas and proportions. Local
financial departments and business management
departments need to strengthen communication in the
process of budget formulation (Wu, Tian & Shen
2019), do a good job of investigation and research in
the early stage of project implementation. In terms of
the performance evaluation index system, the basic
principles to be followed by the department in charge
of TCM projects are: combination of qualitative and
quantitative, combination of theory and practice,
combination of completeness and simplicity, and
combination of objectivity and orientation. Through
the extensive collection of opinions from experts and
professional staff, a performance evaluation index
system with TCM characteristics and in line with the
goals of the TCM project is constructed.
5.2 Carrying out Comprehensive
Evaluation of the Performance of
TCM Projects
At present, TCM projects performance evaluation
often uses single indicators such as project
performance evaluation score or funds execution rate
to evaluate the project implementation unit, which is
not enough to reflect the overall level of the
implementation unit and the overall implementation
of the project. Therefore, the competent department
of TCM projects should actively use grey correlation
analysis method, analytic hierarchy process, indirect
evaluation method and other scientific evaluation
methods when performing performance evaluation.
Scientific evaluation results can mobilize the
initiative of the competent department and project
undertaking units (Huang & Xiao 2017), which is
conducive to to comprehensively grasp the
implementation of the project, find the weak links,
and provide a basis for the competent authority to
make reasonable decisions on the project.
5.3 Improving the Whole Process
Management of TCM Projects
The competent department of TCM projects should
improve management system and realize the whole
process management from project application,
establishment, implementation, interim inspection,
acceptance and performance evaluation. First,
establishing a database of TCM projects, carrying out
ex ante performance evaluation, realizing "project
planning first and fund allocation later". Second,
forming a standardized and real-time project
management and supervision system, dynamically
grasping project progress (Xue 2021), in order to,
improve performance management. What's more
important, the competent department of TCM
projects should actively use information technology,
and establish a database covering the entire process
of budget declaration, review, execution and
performance evaluation (Li & Xie 2020). TCM
project performance management information system
should be constructed to realize the visualization and
informatization of project implementation process
data, carry out monitoring, early warning and
accurate evaluation of project performance operation.
It can also support data collection, performance
evaluation and scientific research for TCM projects.
In the end, the performance evaluation feedback
mechanism should be established (Chen, Leng & Jin
2016). The performance evaluation results should be
linked to the budget preparation, implementing an
accountability system for units to ensure the
standardization and rationality of project
implementation. As a safeguard measure of
performance management, it is necessary to establish
a team of performance management talents to ensure
the completion of various work with high quality.