Sensing Bandwidth Enlargement with Ten Orthogonal Codes in
Quasi-distributed Acoustic Sensing System
Ziwen Deng
a
, Ruobing Xu
b
, Yuyao Wang
c
, Jialin Jiang
d
and Zinan Wang
*e
Key Lab of Optical Fiber Sensing & Communications, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,
Chengdu, China
Keywords: Optical Fiber Sensing, Acoustic Sensing, Orthogonal Codes, Sensing Bandwidth, Real-time.
Abstract: In recent years, quasi-distributed acoustic sensing (QDAS) has attracted lots of attentions and shows great
advantages in various fields such as structure health monitoring, intrusion sensing and so on. Sensing
bandwidth is one of the essential indexes in QDAS, and there is a trade-off between sensing bandwidth and
sensing distance. To break the limitation, the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology and ten
orthogonal codes in the same frequency (OCSF) are utilized as an innovative technology to multiplex the
sensing channel in a real-time long-distance QDAS system. In this paper, the sensing bandwidth of QDAS is
enlarged to 5 kHz on 99.4 km sensing fiber, which is ten times of that in the conventional QDAS without
channel multiplexing; a 4.9 kHz sinusoidal signal is retrieved in real time successfully, with 10 m spatial
resolution and 43.8 𝑝ɛ/
√
𝐻𝑧
noise level.
1 INTRODUCTION
With the increasing demand for high-sensitivity
acoustic sensing in the fields like railway traffic
system supervision, border security, oil and gas
monitoring and so on, distributed optical fiber sensing
(DOFS) technology is playing an important role in
these scenarios. With various advantages, DOFS is a
research hot area in recent decades and the further
value of it is gradually being explored.
As an important branch of DOFS, phase sensitive
optical time domain reflectometry (Π€-OTDR) uses
high coherent narrow-linewidth laser as the light
source to sense the fluctuation of the external
environment through the phase of the Rayleigh
backscattering (RBS) light. Π€-OTDR is based on
optical fiber to perceive acoustic signal, and it has the
merit of high sensitivity, high temperature resistance,
anti-corrosion and being immune to electromagnetic
interference, so it can be used for tracking the trains
and cars, monitoring earthquakes and other important
fields.
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-5423
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8510-6135
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6846-9089
d
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-4157
e
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6924-3428
Π€-OTDR can be divided to distributed acoustic
sensing (DAS) and quasi-distributed acoustic sensing
(QDAS) according to the different sensing media.
DAS is based on common single mode fiber (SMF)
and QDAS is based on SMF inscribed with fiber
Bragg gratings (FBGs) or scattering enhanced points
(SEPs) array.
DAS has the advantages of low cost and flexible
spatial resolution. However, the weak and random
Rayleigh scattering may cause the fading
phenomenon, which need more resources to deal
with. While in QDAS, the FBG can offer controllable
and stable reflection. Thus, QDAS has higher
sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), without
fading problem. Due to these advantages, QDAS has
developed rapidly and has been a preferred choice in
some applications.
In QDAS, the sensing bandwidth is an important
parameter and need to be enlarged effectively. By
applying Vernier effect in QDAS, the sensing
bandwidth can be enlarged to dozens of times, but the
target acoustic signal is presupposed to be narrow
152
Deng, Z., Xu, R., Wang, Y., Jiang, J. and Wang, Z.
Sensing Bandwidth Enlargement with Ten Orthogonal Codes in Quasi-distributed Acoustic Sensing System.
DOI: 10.5220/0010972100003121
In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology (PHOTOPTICS 2022), pages 152-157
ISBN: 978-989-758-554-8; ISSN: 2184-4364
Copyright
c
 2022 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
band only. Therefore, to avoid limiting the frequency
feature of signal, multiplexing the sensing bandwidth
is the only way to achieve it. Besides, there is a trade-
off between sensing bandwidth and sensing distance,
because in QDAS, the sensing signals from different
FBGs are distinguished by time of flight. To break the
limitations, frequency-division-multiplexing (FDM)
is an efficient method, which can multiplex the
sensing channel. However, FDM requires extra
frequency-domain resources to realize channel-
multiplexing, but the frequency-domain resources are
precious and supposed to be utilized efficiently.
Recently, our group proposed a QDAS based on
multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) coding
technology, which utilized the orthogonal codes in
the same frequency (OCSF) to multiplex the sensing
channel. The number of the multiplexed sensing
channels depend on the number of the groups of the
codes used. We utilized sequential quadratic
programming (SQP) algorithm to obtain five groups
of OCSF with high auto-correlation and cross-
correlation suppression ratio, indicating the sensing
channels were multiplexed five times and the sensing
bandwidth was five times of that in the conventional
QDAS.
In this paper, to further enlarge the number of the
multiplexed channels, ten codes with about 15.4 dB
peak-to-sidelobe ratio of auto-correlation function
and cross-correlation are generated, which are the
most codes utilized in QDAS. The spatial resolution
is determined by the interval of FBGs, i.e. 10 m. By
utilizing the OCSF and the MIMO technology, the
sensing bandwidth is enlarged to ten times of that in
the conventional QDAS without channel-
multiplexing. Furthermore, a 1455 nm Raman pump
is used for distributed amplification to achieve the
long-distance fiber sensing. Moreover, by utilizing
GPU parallel processing, the disturbance can be
demodulated in real time. As a result, a 5 kHz sensing
bandwidth is achieved on a 99.4 km fiber, and the
external disturbance, can be retrieved real-time
successfully with about 20.5 dB SNR and the strain
noise level of 43.8 𝑝ɛ/
√
𝐻𝑧
.
2 PRINCIPLES
2.1 The Sensing Principle of QDAS
In QDAS, the sensing fiber is an SMF with a series of
enhanced points, which are consist of FBGs/SEPs,
whose reflectivity is much higher than the Rayleigh
scattering (RS).
The light source is modulated into probe pulses
and then injected into the sensing fiber. The
lightwaves will be reflected by the enhanced points,
and the speckled trace is obtained. When a
perturbation, usually acoustic wave, is imposed on the
sensing fiber, the optical path experienced by the
probe lightwaves will be changed. Therefore, the
perturbation can be retrieved and its position can be
located by calculating the phase difference of the
adjacent signals and the time of flight.
To introduce the MIMO-QDAS, the sensing
probe pulse
()Pt is coded by M groups of OCSF
each with N bits length. The amplitudes of OCSF are
the same but the phases are different. The reflected
lightwave
()Et can be expressed as:
1
() () ( / )
M
i
i
r
Et ht P t iT M
=
=βˆ— βˆ’
οƒ₯
(1)
() () exp( 2 )
ii
c
tpt jftP
Ο€
=β‹…
(2)
where
()ht is the impulse response of the sensing
fiber;
r
T is the repeat period of the lightwave; ()
i
pt
is the
th
i modulation function of the probe pulse; M
is the number of dimensions of OCSF and
c
f
is the
frequency of optical carrier.
After detecting by coherent detection, the decoded
sensing signal can be expressed as:
1,..., ,
'(,) () ()
() ( / ) ()
() ( / ) ()
j
jMji
i
i
r
r
i
i
Eti Et pt
ht p t iT M p t
ht p t jT M p t
=β‰ 
=βŠ—
=βˆ—βˆ’ βŠ—
+βˆ—βˆ’βŠ—
οƒ₯
(3)
where
βˆ— denotes the convolution operation and
βŠ—
means the correlation operation.
Assuming the codes have high peak-to-sidelobe
ratio of auto-correlation function and cross-
correlation function, then
'( , )Etican be approximated
as:
/'( , ) ( ) ( )
r
main
M
Eti ht P t iTβ‰ˆβˆ— βˆ’
(4)
where
main
P denotes the main lobe of the auto-
correlation function of
()
i
pt.
Eq. (4) shows that the sensing channel probed by
the pulse
main
P with a repetition period of
/
r
M
T
is
extracted. Therefore, the disturbance sampling rate is
increased by
M times and the OCSF need no extra
frequency band for multiplexing. The acoustic signal
can be demodulated by demodulating the phase
information, demonstrating that the sensing channel
Sensing Bandwidth Enlargement with Ten Orthogonal Codes in Quasi-distributed Acoustic Sensing System
153
has been multiplexed M times and the sensing
bandwidth is enhanced
M times of that in the
conventional QDAS without channel-multiplexing.
2.2 the Generation of Codes
According to Eq. (3), the OCSF are supposed to be
with high peak-to-sidelobe ratio of auto-correlation
function and cross-correlation function, so that the
equation can be approximated as Eq. (4).
To obtain the required codes is an optimization
problem, and the objective function and constraint
condition are given by:
,
,,
min
.. ( ) 0,
1, 1 1,0;
()0,
,1 , 1 1, ;
01;
02;
k
k
t
st A m t
mMkNNk
Cmn t
mn M k N N m n
A
Ο•
ϕπ
βˆ’β‰€
==βˆ’+βˆ’β‰ 
βˆ’β‰€
==βˆ’+βˆ’β‰ 
≀≀
≀≀


A,C, ,t
(5)
where
N is the code length; ,()kAm is the
th
k value of
the auto-correlation function of the
th
m code;
,,()nkCm is the
th
k value of the cross-correlation
function of the
th
m code and the
th
n code;
A
represents the amplitudes of the codes, which is a
(2 1)MNΓ—βˆ’ matrix and
Ο•
means the phases of the
codes, which is a
M
NΓ—
matrix.
The amplitudes of the OCSF are the same, but the
phases of them are different, which range from 0 to
2
Ο€
. The optimization problem above can be solved
by sequential quadratic programming (SQP)
Figure 1: The auto-correlation (a) and cross-correlation (b)
functions of the 10 generated codes.
algorithm, which can be realized by the mathematical
software in practice. With iteration process, the
minimized objective function t can be obtained,
demonstrating the minimized auto-correlation
functions and cross- correlation functions are realized.
Through the method above, ten groups of codes
are successfully generated, and all of them have about
15.4 dB auto-correlation and cross-correlation
suppression ratio, shown in Figure 1 (a) and (b)
respectively.
Figure 2: The experimental setup. I/Q: I/Q electro-optical modulator; EDFA: erbium-doped fiber amplifier; DWDM: dense
wavelength division multiplexing modulator; VOA: variable optical attenuator; PC: polarization controller.
-40 -20 0 20 40
Dela
y
[bit
]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Intensity [dB]
code-1
code-2
code-3
15.4 dB
(a)
Intensity [dB]
PHOTOPTICS 2022 - 10th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology
154
3 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The experimental setup is shown in Figure 2. The
lightwave is emitted from the laser (NKT X15) and
the continuous lightwave from laser source is split
into two branches equally by a polarization
maintaining 1:1 coupler. The upper branch is the
sensing arm, and the lower one is used as the local
oscillator (LO).
The lightwaves in the sensing arm are modulated
by the I/Q electro-optical modulator according to the
codes generated above. All of the ten codes have a
400 MHz frequency shift, so that the heterodyne
detection can be applied and every code is with 400
ns width. The modulated probe codes are amplified
by the erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) and be
filtered out by a tunable filter.
Then the probe signal is guided into the sensing
section. The Raman shift in SMF is 13.2 THz,
indicating that a pump light with a wavelength of
1455 nm has a large Raman gain at 1550 nm. Thus,
to achieve the long distance fiber sensing, a 1455 nm
Raman pump is used for distributed amplification.
The probe signal and the pump signal are combined
by the dense wavelength division multiplexing
(DWDM) modulator to achieve amplification. Then
the signals are guided into the sensing fiber, which is
composed of a 99.4 km SMF and a pair of FBGs. The
reflectivity of the FBGs is about -10 dB, and the
interval between the two FBGs is 10 m. A variable
optical attenuator (VOA) is added to the fiber line to
compensate for the difference in fiber loss between
SMF and FBGs. Besides, a piezoelectric ceramics
transducer (PZT) is applied between two FBGs at the
end of the fiber to simulate the external vibration.
The reflected signal from sensing fiber will be
collected by the circulator and filtered out by a
tunable filter. Then the signal is beat with the LO in
an optical hybrid. The mixed lightwaves are detected
by two balanced photodetectors (BPDs). Finally, the
two-channel photoelectric-signals are sampled by a
high speed analog to digital converter (ADC) with 3.2
GSa/s acquisition rate. By utilizing GPU parallel
processing technology, the speed of computation can
be greatly improved and the signal can be
demodulated in real time.
In the conventional QDAS, the sensing bandwidth
is limited by the pulse round-trip time in sensing
fiber. The total length of the sensing distance is 99.4
km, representing 972.9 Β΅s round-trip time. The total
repetition period is supposed to be a little longer than
the round-trip time of the pulse. In practice, the
interval between adjacent codes is 100 Β΅s, indicating
that the total repetition period is 1 ms. The repetition
Figure 3: The intensity curves of the sensing signal.
Figure 4: The measured 0.8 kHz sinusoidal signal.
period represents a 1 kHz scan-rate in the
conventional QDAS system and according to the
Nyquist sampling theorem, the sensing bandwidth of
it is 500 Hz. By introducing the MIMO technology in
QDAS, the scan-rate of the system is as high as 10
kHz, which is ten times of the maximum scan-rate in
traditional single-pule scheme, bounded by the 1 ms
repetition period, and the sensing bandwidth is
accordingly enlarged to 5 kHz.
A 800 Hz sinusoidal signal is applied on the PZT
first to verify the sensing ability of MIMO-QDAS.
The demodulated traces are plotted in Figure 3, and
the reflected signals at each FBG are separated
clearly, indicating the spatial resolution of 10 m is
realized. The measured signal in real time is shown in
Figure 4, the black dots are experimental results and
the fitted curve of the measured signal is also plotted
in blue, which is approximately a sinusoidal wave
model, demonstrating the good sensing performance
of the real-time MIMO-QDAS.
In order to verify the enlargement of the sensing
bandwidth, sinusoidal signals of different frequencies
are added on the PZT. The frequencies of the three
signals are 1.2 kHz, 3.1 kHz and 4.9 kHz respectively.
Intensity [dB]
Sensing Bandwidth Enlargement with Ten Orthogonal Codes in Quasi-distributed Acoustic Sensing System
155
Figure 5: The PSD of the measured acoustic signals in
different frequencies.
The power spectrum density (PSD) of the real-
time demodulated signals are illustrated in Figure 5.
The lowest SNR of the acoustic signals is 20.5 dB,
which indicates that the real-time acoustic signals can
be required with high quality clearly. The maximum
noise level around the 4.9 kHz disturbance frequency
is about -48.1 dB, and the strain noise level is
43.8 𝑝ɛ/
√
𝐻𝑧
.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, a real-time MIMO-QDAS with high
performance is demonstrated by utilizing the OCSF.
The generation of the codes is elaborated and ten
groups of codes with about 15.4 dB auto-correlation
and cross-correlation suppression ratio are obtained.
As a result, the sensing bandwidth is enlarged to 5
kHz on 99.4 km sensing distance, which is ten times
of that in the conventional QDAS without
multiplexing and the spatial resolution is 10 m. The
multiplexed channels are doubled compared with the
previous MIMO-QDAS system that our group
achieved, and real-time signal demodulation is
demonstrated. Particularly, a 4.9 kHz sinusoidal
strain signal is retrieved in real time, with 43.8 𝑝ɛ/
√
𝐻𝑧 noise level.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
National Natural Science Foundation of China
(62075030); Sichuan Provincial Project for
Outstanding Young Scholars in Science and
Technology (2020JDJQ0024).
REFERENCES
Ping Lu, Nageswara Lalam, Mudabbir Badar, Bo Liu,
Benjamin T. Chorpening, Michael P. et al. (2019).
"Distributed optical fiber sensing: Review and
perspective", Applied Physics Reviews 6, 041302.
Yaxi Yan, Hua Zheng, Zhiyong Zhao, Changjian Guo,
Xiong Wu, Junhui Hu, Alan Pak Tao Lau, and Chao Lu.
(2021). "Distributed Optical Fiber Sensing Assisted by
Optical Communication Techniques" J. Lightwave
Technol. 39, 3654-3670.
L. Zhou, F. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Pan, Z. Sun, J. Hua, and X.
Zhang. (2015). β€œDistributed Strain and Vibration
Sensing System Based on Phase-Sensitive OTDR”,
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27(17), 1884–1887.
J. Liang, Z. Wang, B. Lu, X. Wang, L. Li, Q. Ye, R. Qu,
and H. Cai. (2019). β€œDistributed acoustic sensing for
2D and 3D acoustic source localization”, Opt. Lett.
44(7), 1690–1693.
Rao, Y., Wang, Z., Wu, H, Huijuan Wu, Zengling Ran, and
Bing Han. (2021). β€œRecent Advances in Phase-Sensitive
Optical Time Domain Reflectometry (Π€-OTDR)”,
Photonic Sens 11, 1–30.
E. F. Williams, M. R. FernΓ‘ndez-Ruiz, R. Magalhaes, R.
Vanthillo, Z. Zhan, M. GonzΓ‘lez-HerrΓ‘ez, and H. F.
Martins. (2019). β€œDistributed sensing of microseisms
and teleseisms with submarine dark fibers”, Nat.
Commun. 10, 1–11.
M.-F. Huang, M. Salemi, Y. Chen, J. Zhao, T. J. Xia, G. A.
Wellbrock, Y.-K. Huang, G. Milione, E. Ip, P. Ji, T.
Wang,and Y. Aono. (2020). β€œFirst field trial of
distributed fiber optical sensing and high-speed
communication over an operational telecom network”,
J. Light. Technol. 38, 75–81.
M. Wu, X. Fan, Q. Liu, and Z. He. (2020). β€œQuasi-
distributed fiber-optic acoustic sensing system based on
pulse compression technique and phase-noise
compensation”, Opt. Lett., vol. 44, no. 24, pp. 5969–
5972.
Z.Wang, B.Zhang, J.Xiong, Y.Fu, S.Lin, J.Jiang. et al.
(2018). β€œDistributed acoustic sensing based on pulse-
coding phase-sensitive OTDR”, IEEE Internet Things
J.,vol.6,no.4,pp.6117–6124.
X. Zhang, G. Zheng, Y. Shan, Z. Sun, and Y. Zhang.
(2016). β€œEnhanced Ο†- OTDR system for quantitative
strain measurement based on ultra-weak fiber Bragg
grating array”, Opt. Eng. 55, 054103.
G. Liang, J. Jiang, K. Liu, S. Wang, T. Xu, W. Chen, Z. Ma,
Z. Ding, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and T. Liu. (2020).
β€œPhase demodulation method based on a dual-
identical-chirped-pulse and weak fiber Bragg gratings
for quasi-distributed acoustic sensing”, Photon. Res. 8,
1093–1099.
H. Li, Q. Sun, T. Liu, C. Fan, T. He, Z. Yan, D. Liu, and P.
P. Shum. (2020). β€œUltra-high sensitive quasi-
distributed acoustic sensor based on coherent OTDR
and cylindrical transducer”, J. Light. Technol. 38, 929–
938.
B. Redding, M. J. Murray, A. Donko, M. Beresna, A.
Masoudi, and G. Brambilla. (2020). β€œLow-noise
012345
Frequenc
[kHz
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
PSD [dB rad
2
/Hz]
1.2 kHz 3.1 kHz 4.9 kHz
20.5 dB
PHOTOPTICS 2022 - 10th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology
156
distributed acoustic sensing using enhanced
backscattering fiber with ultra-low-loss point
reflectors”, Opt. Express 28, 14638–14647.
K. YΓΌksel, J. Jason, E. B. Koal, M. Lopez-Amo, and M.
Wuilpart. (2020). β€œAn overview of the recent advances
in FBG-assisted phase-sensitive OTDR technique and
its applications,” in Transparent Optical Networks,
2020. ICTON 2020.
Zitan Wang, Jialin Jiang, Zinan Wang, Ji Xiong, Zijie Qiu,
Chunye Liu, and Yunjiang Rao. (2020). "Quasi-
distributed acoustic sensing with interleaved identical
chirped pulses for multiplying the measurement slew-
rate", Opt. Express 28, 38465-38479.
L. Xin, Z. Li, X. Gui, X. Fu, M. Fan, J. Wang, and H. Wang.
(2020). β€œSurface intrusion event identification for
subway tunnels using ultra-weak FBG array based
fiber sensing”, Opt. Express 28(5), 6794–6805.
W. Gan, S. Li, Z. Li, and L. Sun. (2019). β€œIdentification of
ground intrusion in underground structures based on
distributed structural vibration detected by ultra-weak
FBG sensing technology”, Sensors 19(9), 2160.
M. Wu, X. Fan, X. Zhang, L. Yan, and Z. He. (2020).
β€œFrequency response enhancement of phase-sensitive
OTDR for interrogating weak reflector array by using
OFDM and vernier effect”, J. Light. Technol. 38, 4874–
4882.
Z. Wang, J. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Xiong, and Y.-J. Rao. (2020).
β€œBandwidth-enhanced quasi-distributed acoustic
sensing with interleaved chirped pulses”, IEEE Sensors
J. 20, 12739–12743.
Y. X. Zhang, S. Y. Fu, Y. S. Chen, Z. W. Ding, Y. Y. Shan,
F. Wang. et al. (2019). β€œA visibility enhanced
broadband phase-sensitive OTDR based on the
UWFBG array and frequency-division-multiplexing”,
Opt. Fiber Technol. 53, 101995.
J. Jiang, J. Xiong, Z. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Qiu, C. Liu, Z.
Deng, and Y.-J. Rao. (2021). β€œQuasi-distributed fiber-
optic acoustic sensing with MIMO technology”, in
IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 20, pp.
15284-15291, 15 Oct.15.
Jialin Jiang, Ziwen Deng, and Zinan Wang. (2021).
"Channel-multiplexing for quasi-distributed acoustic
sensing with orthogonal codes", Opt. Express 29,
36828-36839.
Seong-Jung Kim, and Jeong-Hae Lee. (2018). β€œResonance
Frequency and Bandwidth of the Negative/Positive nth
Mode of a Composite Right-/Left-Handed Transmission
Line”. J Electromagn Eng Sci. 2018;18(1):1-6.
J. Jiang, Z. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Wu, S. Lin, J. Xiong, Y.
Chen, and Y. Rao. (2019). β€œCoherent Kramers-Kronig
receiver for Π€-OTDR,” J. Lightwave Technol. 37(18),
4799–4807.
Xiong J, Wang Z, Wu Y, Wu H, Rao Y. (2020). β€œLong-
distance distributed acoustic sensing utilizing negative
frequency band”, Opt Express. 2020 Nov
23;28(24):35844-35856.
Wang Z, Zhang L, Wang S, Xue N, Peng F, Fan M, Sun W,
Qian X, Rao J, Rao Y. (2016). Coherent Ξ¦-OTDR
based on I/Q demodulation and homodyne detection.
Opt Express. 24(2):853-8.
Z. Q. Pan, K. Z. Liang, Q. Ye, et al. (2011). Phase-sensitive
OTDR system based on digital coherent detection. Asia
Communications and Photonics Conference and
Exhibition, Shanghai, 2011: 83110S.
W. Tomboza, S. Guerrier, E. Awwad and C. Dorize. (2021).
"High Sensitivity Differential Phase OTDR for Acoustic
Signals Detection", in IEEE Photonics Technology
Letters, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 645-648.
D. Chen, Q. Liu, and Z. He. (2017). "Distributed Fiber-
optic Acoustic Sensor with Sub-nano Strain Resolution
Based on Time-gated Digital OFDR", in Asia
Communications and Photonics Conference, OSA
Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, 2017),
paper S4A.2.
Shuker R and Gammon RW. (1970). Raman-scattering
selection-rule breaking and the density of states in
amorphous materials. Phys Rev Lett 25:222–235.
Sensing Bandwidth Enlargement with Ten Orthogonal Codes in Quasi-distributed Acoustic Sensing System
157