aspect that definitely favors Nokia’s choice of tech-
nology is the increase in Link capacity without the
need to upgrade hardware components to have higher
speeds (Lapukhov et al., 2016). On Nokia routers
this is enabled using Link Aggregation Group ( LAG)
(LAG, 2011). So depending on the capacity required
the router card ports (which can be at the same or dif-
ferent speeds) are mixed and form a LAG with a ca-
pacity equal to the sum of the capacities of each port.
The LAG also offers stability, so if a LAG fails for
various reasons then the standby LAG will take over
the passage of traffic (Bhatia, 2014). In the above di-
agram we have specifically LAG 5 for the connection
between R1 and R5, LAG 5 for the connection be-
tween R3 and R7, LAG 2 for the connection between
R1 and R3, while LAG 10 in each of the BGW routers
(R1 and R3) we have it for the output on the Internet,
more specifically are the LAGs that connect end-to-
end between our network and the ISP (Internet Ser-
vice Provider). LAG 10 in R3 is also the primary line
for the end-to-end connection with the ISP while LAG
10 in R1 is in the standby state, which means that if
for various reasons LAG 10 to R3 (reasons related to
the LAG itself for example fiber damages, reasons re-
lated to the router itself or the router card where we
created the LAG is in trouble) is no longer in work-
ing condition then the active role will pass LAG 10 to
R1. So the above description is known as the principle
of redundancy (specifically, one runs as the primary
router and the other as a backup router). In our case
both LAG 10 on each router (R1 and R3) are termi-
nated on the same ISP. Sincewe have taken as active
LAG the LAG 10 at R3 after the traffic comes to this
router from the ISP we send this traffic to the chorus
routers which are in our case R5 and R7. We see again
as in the case of BGW routers in the core part we have
two routers and again we apply the principle of re-
dundancy where R7 acts as the primary core router,
so the traffic coming to R3 via LAG 5 will be sent to
router R7. If for various reasons router R7 is not in
working conditions or LAG 5 from R3 to R7 is dys-
functional then the traffic coming from ISP to router
R3 must be routed in alternate routes in order for the
traffic to end at the core router R5 (which serves as
a standby router). To send traffic from R3 to R5 ini-
tially through LAG 2 we will send the traffic from
R3 to R1 and here through LAG 5 we will send the
traffic from R1 to R5. Each service is uniquely iden-
tified by a service ID and an optional service name
within a service area (Bhatia, 2014). The Nokia ser-
vice router model uses logical service entities to con-
struct a service (Documentation, 2020). In the Nokia
router services can provide Layer 2 bridged service or
Layer 3 IP-routed connectivity between a service ac-
cess point (SAP) on one router and another service ac-
cess point (a SAP is where traffic enters and exits the
service) on the same ( local) router or another router
(distributed). A distributed service spans more than
one router (Bhatia, 2014) . Common to all Nokia ser-
vice router connectivity services are policies that are
assigned to the service (Documentation, 2020). Poli-
cies are defined at a global level and then applied to a
service on the router (Nokia, 2017). Policies are used
to define Nokia service router service enhancements
(Nokia, 2019a). One type of policies that is common
to the router’s connectivity services is –SAP Quality
of Service (QoS) policies which allow for different
classes of traffic within a service at SAP ingress and
SAP egress (Nokia, 2017). QoS ingress and egress
policies determine the QoS characteristics for a SAP
(Alcatel-Lucent, 2012). A QoS policy applied to a
SAP specifies the number of queues, queue character-
istics (such as forwarding class, committed, and peak
information rates, and so on) and the mapping of traf-
fic to a forwarding class (Router, 2017). A QoS policy
must be created before it can be applied to a SAP. A
single ingress and a single egress QoS policy can be
associated with a SAP (Nokia, 2019b). The QoS pol-
icy of inbound (ingress) services defines how incom-
ing traffic to an SAP is classified and ranked before it
is forwarded to the outbound.The QoS policy of out-
bound services (egress) determines how traffic will be
served just before it is forwarded to an SAP.
2.1 Experimental Analysis
In SAP-INGRESS QoS Policy and SAP-EGRESS
QoSPolicy , if we use the percent-rate command as
well as in the LAG configuration we use the adapt-qos
distribute command, then a traffic cut will be noticed.
Logically if ”percent-rate” is used and the gate is ac-
tually a LAG then a 100 PIR should give a rate equal
to the capacity of the LAG. Analyzing traffic it is no-
ticed that the calculation is actually based on a single
gate, which yields in traffic intersection, the graphical
representation of which is given in figures 2 and 3.
Figure 2: Traffic chart link 1 in LAG 10 to R3.
LAG-s taken into consideration in the router 7750
SR-7 are created with two ports each with a capacity
ICEIS 2022 - 24th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
598