Figure 6: Changes in C/N (a) and germination index (GI)
(b) during the composting process.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In all treatments, typical variation curves in
parameters such as temperature, EC, DOC, C/N and
the succession of microbial community were
observed. Produced composts were found to be
phytotoxic-free convinced by the germination
experiment. When microbial agent was applied,
better performance was obtained during co-
composting of wheat straw and food waste proved by
the relatively higher thermophilic temperatures,
lower C/N ratio and higher GI value. Inoculation
contributed to a more diverse microbial community
and had a clear advantage in acceleration of the
compost degradation, sanitation and maturation
process. However, application of microbial agent is
less economic. Without microbial agent, satisfied
results could still be achieved because of the
appropriate composting conditions such as nutrient
adjustment, forced aeration and active endogenous
microorganisms.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by The Open Funding
Project of National Key Laboratory of Human Factors
Engineering (grant number 6142222190714), and
Key Laboratory of Shenzhen Longgang District
(grant number ZSYS2017001).
REFERENCES
APHA. (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of
water and Wastewater, 20th ed. American PublicHeslth
Association, Washington, DC. pp. 481-486.
Bernal, M.P., Alburquerque, J., Moral, R. (2009)
Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria
for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresour.
Technol. 100(22): 5444-5453.
Bustamante, M.A., Paredes, C., Moral, R., Agulló, E.,
Pérez-Murcia, M.D. Abad, M. (2008) Composts from
distillery wastes as peat substitutes for transplant
production. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 52(5): 792-799.
Fourti, O. (2013) The maturity tests during the composting
of municipal solid wastes. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 72:
43-49.
Gao, M., Liang, F., Yu, A., Li, B., Yang, L. (2010)
Evaluation of stability and maturity during forced-
aeration composting of chicken manure and sawdust at
different C/N ratios. Chemosphere 78(5): 614-619.
Hubbe, M.A., Nazhad, M., Sánchez, C. (2010) Composting
as a way to convert cellulosic biomass and organic
waste into high-value soil amendments: A review.
Bioresources 5(4): 2808-2854.
Inbar, Y., Hadar, Y., Chen, Y. (1993) Recycling of cattle
manure: the composting process and characterization of
maturity. J. Environ. Qual. 22(4): 857-863.
Jurado, M., López, M., Suárez-Estrella, F., Vargas-García,
M.C., López-González, J.A., Moreno, J. (2014)
Exploiting composting biodiversity: study of the
persistent and biotechnologically relevant
microorganisms from lignocellulose-based
composting. Bioresour. Technol. 162: 283-293.
Lehtomäki, A., Huttunen, S., Rintala, J. (2007) Laboratory
investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop
residues with cow manure for methane production:
effect of crop to manure ratio. Resour. Conserv. Recy.
51(3): 591-609.
Li, Y., Park, S.Y., Zhu, J. (2011) Solid-state anaerobic
digestion for methane production from organic waste.
Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 15(1): 821-826.
Li, W., Liu, Y., Hou, Q., Huang, W., Zheng, H., Gao, X.,
Yu, J., Kwok, L., Zhang, H., Sun, Z. (2020)
Lactobacillus plantarum improves the efficiency of
sheep manure composting and the quality of the final
product. Bioresour. Technol. 297: 122456.
Luo, Y., Liang, J., Zeng, G., Chen, M., Mo, Dan., Li, G.,
Zhang, D. (2018) Seed germination test for toxicity
(