would be secrete to oral cavity, and then be reduced
to nitrite by symbiotic bacteria in mouth. Because of
the antibacterial function of nitrite, many bacteria in
mouth can be inhibited. As for gastrointestinal tract,
acidic environment provided by gastric acid would
acidify nitrite, helping to kill bacteria. To illustrate,
Dykhuizen et al. conducted experiment that make
Yersinia enterocolitica, Salmonella Enteritidis,
Shigella sonnei, and Escherichia coli O157 to be
exposed different concentration of nitrite and
different PH. As a result, they found that the acidic
condition and nitrite would cooperate to kill pathogen
(Dykhuizen et al. 1996). Skin is also a weak acidic
environment because nitrite would be released to the
surface of skin with sweat, and nitrite can play a role
in defensing bacteria on skin.
2.2 Harms of Nitrite
2.2.1 Carcinogenicity of Nitrite
The carcinogenicity of nitrite is still sort of
controversial. Some scientists are big supporters of
the opinion that nitrite would lead to cancer. First, the
mechanism of nitrite is very clear. Nitrite does not
cause cancer directly, and most of the intake of nitrite
would be excreted out of body along with urine.
Nevertheless, under acidic condition (PH 1-4) some
of nitrite would decompose into nitrous acid, which
would then decompose into nitroso due to the
instability. After this, nitroso would combine with
secondary amine, a kind of metabolites of protein, to
synthesize nitrosamine, which is a sort of very strong
carcinogen. Nitrosamine would methylate guanine of
RNA and DNA to make mutation occur in cells
(Zhang et al. 2015). Second, some experiments, such
as the experiment conducted by U.S. National
Toxicology Program, showed that although there was
no evidence showing that the sodium nitrite had
carcinogenic activity in the group of female F344/N
rats and male B6C3F1 mice, they found that maybe
the carcinogenic activity displayed in the group of
female B6C3F1 mice according to the positive trend
in the incidences of squamous cell papilloma or
carcinoma (combined) in the forestomach (Program
2008).
Other scientists believe that nitrite does not have
the property of carcinogenicity, so they contradicts
the opinion above respectively. First, the formation of
great amount of nitrosamine is not convincing.
Specifically, nitrite requires nitrite reductase from
certain bacteria to catalyze the reaction of synthesis
of nitrosamine, but healthy people have very little this
sort of bacteria in their stomach. What is more, 500
mg vitamin C can reduce the formation of
nitrosamine in stomach reduce by 99%, so the
everyday diet would almost prevent the formation of
it. What is more, attributing to the acidic environment
in stomach, nitrite would be quickly reduced into NO,
and then released out of body (Griesenbeck et al.
2009). Therefore, it is no need to worry about the
nitrosamine transformed from nitrite. Second, the
experiment of rats and mice is not convincing either.
This research only offer the evidence of
carcinogenicity in forestomach of female B6C3F1
mice, but not offer evidence of carcinogenicity in
other organs or tissues in both female and male mice
and rats (Bryan et al. 2012). Third, as evidenced by
information in figure 3 shown below (Bryan et al.
2012), scientist indicates that the a majority of
research proving that nitrite is carcinogenicity was
conducted several decades ago, and most of more
recent, and better-designed studies showed that nitrite
was not related to cancer.
However, some other scientists raises new point
that nitrite does not cause cancer, but induce cancer
(Huang et al. 2009). Specifically, before the
formation of tumour, cancer cells has already attain
denitrification gene from some symbiotic bacteria
with anaerobic metabolism in human body, and then
survive as cancer stem cells. In certain condition,
these cancer stem cells would move to tumour, and
the gene with the function of denitrification would be
activated. These cells would choose nitrite respiration
to adapt to the microenvironment surrounding the
tumour. Hence, as the source of nutrient of cancer
cells, nitrite may promote the growth of them, but not
cause cancer. However, this idea does not have
enough data, or material supporting it so that the truth
of this theory is doubted.
2.2.2 Teratogenicity of Nitrite
Like the carcinogenicity, the teratogenicity of nitrite
is also controversial. Many materials show the
teratogenicity of nitrite. For example, NaNO2 would
damage the DNA of supporting cell of testis when the
dose of NaNO2 is larger than 150 μg /ml (Ren 2007).
Some other information disproves the teratogenicity
of nitrite. For instance, 0-100 mol/L sodium nitrite
under neutral condition would not hurt DNA of
epithelial cells in stomach. Only when PH falls to 4.2
and the dose of sodium nitrite is more than 50
mmol/L, the DNA might be damaged (Smith et al.
2006). Thus, people cannot reach that strict standard
of environment in their daily life, so the harm
stemming from the teratogenicity would not occur.
ICHIH 2022 - International Conference on Health Big Data and Intelligent Healthcare