Possible Results 1 fully support the hypothesis.
Compared with the negative group, the expression
level of IFN-γ is upregulated and the melanoma cell
apoptosis is promoted, which is consistent with the
positive group. The result is consistent with previous
studies investigating IGFLR1's effect on CD4+ T
cells and IFN-γ’s effect on cancer cells. It indicates
that IGFL1 activating IGFLR1 therapy has potential
value in anti-melanoma treatment. Further studies
investigating the specific gene regulation
mechanism of IGFLR1 should be done for a
thorough understanding of its structures and
functions. The relation between IGFLR1 and IGFL1
should also be investigated to investigate the more
specific IGFLR1 pathway. Preclinical testing on
more complex and representative animal models
such as rabbits and monkeys should also be done
before the transition to clinical testing of IGFLR1
activation therapy. In order to improve this
therapeutic method, better delivery platforms like
small molecule carriers or mechanisms involving
controlled-release should be applied as well.
Possible Results 2 partially support the
hypothesis. In Possible Result 2, IGFL1 activation
fails in vivo experiment. In mice experiment,
compared with positive group, the ELISA result will
indicate a low expression level of IFN-γ. And
IGFL1 level is almost no higher than the negative
group. The failure of the in vivo experiment is most
likely to be caused by the unsuccessful delivery of
IGFL1 in vivo: IGFL1 does not reach CD4+ T cells
through vein injection or does not maintain in the
body long enough for its functions. To improve the
experiment, a highly efficient and dependable
delivery method should be developed. The safety
level of activating the IGFLR1 pathway to enhance
antitumor immune responses should be improved
before clinical trials. Furthermore, new agonists
activating IGFLR1 could be developed in place of
IGFL1.
Possible Results 3 and 4 both partially support
the hypothesis. Both of the results indicate that
IGFLR1 activation cannot promote the cell
apoptosis in human melanoma cell lines. Compared
with negative group, the ELISA result will indicate
almost no difference in the expression level of
IFN-γ. Only if the IGFLR1 activation promotes the
cell apoptosis in human melanoma cell samples, the
IGFL1 activating IGFLR1 treatment will potentially
have therapeutic effects and should be carried on to
clinical trial. Possible Results 3 and 4 indicate that
the IGFLR1 activation is not qualified to be a
universal treatment for melanoma either because the
A375 cell line does not have an IFN-γ receptor or
has a different type of IFN-γ mechanism. This will
require future studies to re-evaluate the relationship
between IFN-γ, IGFLR1, and general types of
melanoma.
Possible Results 5 and 6 indicate potential errors
in the experimental designs. Possible Results 5
partially support the hypothesis. The expression
level of IFN-γ and cancer cell apoptosis rate in
murine cell line does not change significantly. It
indicates that IGFL1 cannot be applied to mice.
Searching for new agonists will be required for
future studies on animal cell lines. At the same time,
IGFL1 activating IGFLR1 treatment should be
applied to other types of human melanoma cell lines
to investigate the therapeutic effect. Possible Results
6 contradicts the hypothesis. In result 6, IGFLR1
activation is unsuccessful in all cell samples.
Compared with the negative group, the expression
level of IFN-γ is not considerably changed. It
indicates that IGFL1 does not activate IGFLR1,
which means bioinformatic data deviates from the
actual situation. This result may be caused by an
inappropriate cell incubation method or IGFL1
concentration. In this case, changing experimental
designs is required. This result may also be caused
by IGFLR1 participating in multiple pathways. This
will require further studies on IGFLR1 pathways
and the development of new agonists aiming at
IGFLR1.
The Possible Result 7 and 8 partially contradicts
the hypothesis. In Result 7, The IFN-gamma level in
the blood is upregulated, which is consistent with
positive group. However, there is not a significant
increase in the ratio of melanoma cell apoptosis after
IGFL1 activation. This result indicates that CD4+ T
cells is successfully activated, however, some
oncogenic mutations may be present in the
melanoma cell line, which means that future clinical
melanoma therapies through activating IGFLR1
could not be applied for all kinds of melanoma types
since each cell line can have such a mutation.
However, this result is unlikely to happen on the
well-studied melanoma cell lines since the IFN-γ
pathways are relatively well studied in these cell
lines. In Possible Result 8, melanoma cell apoptosis
is prompted, which is consistent with positive group.
However, there is not a significant increase in the
IFN-gamma level in the blood. It indicates that an
alternative IGFL1 pathway may be crucial for CD4+
T cell stimulation. Future studies should be focused
on investigating the expression level of other
cytokines to verify the effects of IGFL1 activation
on CD4+ T cells.