Agency of the European Commission under EMJD
ICE FPA n 2010-0012.
REFERENCES
Adams, W., Reid, S., and LeMaster, R. (2008a). A Study
of Educational Simulations Part I-Engagement and
Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning, 19(3):397–
419.
Adams, W., Reid, S., and LeMaster, R. (2008b). A study of
educational simulations Part IIInterface Design. Jour-
nal of Interactive Learning, 19(4):551–577.
Adams, W. K., Paulson, A., Wieman, C. E., Henderson, C.,
Sabella, M., and Hsu, L. (2008c). What Levels of
Guidance Promote Engaged Exploration with Interac-
tive Simulations? In AIP Conference Proceedings,
pages 59–62. Aip.
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., and Tenenbaum,
H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction en-
hance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology,
103(1):1–18.
Bonestroo, W. J. and de Jong, T. (2012). Effects of plan-
ning on task load, knowledge, and tool preference: a
comparison of two tools. Interactive Learning Envi-
ronments, 20(2):141–153.
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. a., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T.,
and Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature re-
view of empirical evidence on computer games and
serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2):661–
686.
Elam, K. (2004). Grid Systems: Principles of Organizing
Type (Design Briefs). Princeton Architectural Press,
New York.
Ferguson-hessler, M. G. M. and de Jong, T. (1991). A
Model of the cognitive aspects of physics instruction.
In AERA Annual Meeting, pages 3–7.
Fu, F.-L., Su, R.-C., and Yu, S.-C. (2009). EGameFlow:
A scale to measure learners enjoyment of e-learning
games. Computers & Education, 52(1):101–112.
Gijlers, H. and de Jong, T. (2013). Using Concept
Maps to Facilitate Collaborative Simulation-Based In-
quiry Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences,
22(3):340–374.
Heyworth, R. (1999). International Journal of Procedu-
ral and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice
students for the solving of a basic problem in chem-
istry. International Journal of Science Education,
21(2):195–211.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn?
Things are seldom what they seem. Computer As-
sisted Learning, 7(2):75–83.
Jong, T. D. (2006). Technological Advances in Inquiry
Learning. Science (New York, N.Y.), 312(5773):532–
3.
Karpicke, J. D. and Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval prac-
tice produces more learning than elaborative study-
ing with concept mapping. Science (New York, N.Y.),
331(6018):772–5.
Kiili, K. and Lainema, T. (2008). Foundation for measuring
engagement in educational games. Journal of Interac-
tive Learning Research, 19(3):469–488.
Kirschner, P. and Clark, R. (2006). Work: An Analysis
of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-
Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Ed-
ucational Psychologist, 41(2):75–86.
Kolloffel, B. and de Jong, T. (2013). Conceptual under-
standing of electrical circuits in secondary vocational
engineering education: Combining traditional instruc-
tion with inquiry learning in a virtual. Journal of En-
gineering Education, 102(3):375 – 393.
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., and Schutze, H. (2008). In-
troduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
McLaren, B., Lim, S., and Koedinger, K. (2008). When
and how often should worked examples be given to
students? New results and a summary of the current
state of research. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M.
Sloutsky (Eds.). In Love, B., editor, 30th Annual Con-
ference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 2176–
2181.
Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid,
S., Wieman, C., and LeMaster, R. (2006). PhET: Inter-
active Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics.
The Physics Teacher, 44(1):18.
Podolefsky, N. S., Perkins, K. K., and Adams, W. K. (2010).
Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer
simulations. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics
Education Research, 6(2).
Pranantha, D., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., and DeGloria, A.
(2012). A Format of Serious Games for Higher Tech-
nology Education Topics: A Case Study in a Digital
Electronic System Course. In International Confer-
ence on Advanced Learning Technologies, pages 13–
17, Rome. IEEE.
Rajaraman, A. and Ullman, J. D. (2011). Mining of Massive
Datasets. Cambridge University Press.
Salen, K. and Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of Play: Game
Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mas-
sachusetts.
Vanlehn, K., Lynch, C., and Schulze, K. (2005). The Andes
physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. Interna-
tional Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,
15(3):147–204.
Wensveen, S. A. G., Djajadiningrat, J. P., and Overbeeke,
C. J. (2004). Interaction frogger: a design frame-
work to couple action and function through feedback
and feedforward. In Designing interactive systems:
processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pages
177–184, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Woolf, B. P. (2009). Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors
for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann,
Amsterdam.
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., and
van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the
cognitive and motivational effects of serious games.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2):249–265.
DesigningPhysicsGametoSupportInquiryLearningandtoPromoteRetrievalPractice
337