Student’s Self Development in Higher Education

Nunu Heryanto, Purnomo Purnomo and Viena R. Hasanah

Department of Society Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No. 229, Bandung, Indonesia

nu2_heryanto@yahoo.co.id, purnomo@upi.edu, vienarusmiati@gmail.com

Keywords: Students, Self-Development, Seven Habits.

Abstract: Students as generation of hope of the nation, young people who have great potential in applying scientific, of

course, tend to be motivated by the young age, in the age of transition from juvenile stage to the adult stage.

Thus, students are also thick with dynamism and attitudes that objective, systematic and rational. This research

done for 6 months (1 semester) to students in the 1st semester in the Department of Society Education in

Faculty of Science Education in Indonesia University of Education, the approach of this research is

quantitative descriptive. This research aim to reveal behavior or habits that enrich the student’s academic

climate with seven habits indicators and efforts that is needed to be done in the context of self-development.

The number of respondents is 64 students. The results shows that the lowest score is in “be proactive” indicator

with the attitude that shows “commitment and responsibility”, and other indicators of the seven habits is in

good category. This aspect influenced by the group climate and the role of the leader in the group that was

too democratic, so the group was uncontrolled. As a new college student (first semester), they not find yet

about the pattern of the good communication in the group, they are still looking for the click (small groups)

that separates themselves. Besides that, there are students that still on adaptation process in the groups.

Implication from this research is the necessity of knowing college student’s behavior in the first semester, in

order to be able to mapping, addressing potential self-college student and self-concept should be built well.

1 INTRODUCTION

The individual personality of the student is a group of

individuals who experience the process as adults,

prepared by the University in accordance with its

expertise. Coupled with the development era of social

situations constantly changing, affecting the

individual personalities or groups. Building character

of students in University need to be supported by

learning environment situation. Setting learning for

adolescents, has differences with the setting of

learning for children. Students included the late teens

to the age range of 17 to 21 years, so the transition

maturation process also needs to be directed in the

learning process. In contrast to adults over the age of

30-55 years (mid adult) and age over 55 years is

called (late adulthood), preferring the principles

Andragogy in the learning process (Brooks, Gunn, J.,

1993); (Rice, PF, 1996); (Benson, PL, 2002);

(Zaidatun Tasir et al., 2008); (Norah Md Noor, et al.,

2012); (Paramitasari, R., 2012); (Coal, JR, 2016).

Students have a strategic role as a change agent

(agent of change) in establishing, revitalizing, revise,

and criticized the order of life of the nation,

realistically and logically accepted by society.

Students as part of society, it is expected and a hope

of the community to provide their contributions on

development. The learning experience (learning

experiences) obtained by the students consists of two

forms, namely: 1) experience in involvement in the

study, called the learning process; and 2) experience

learning in the form of the ability of learning

outcomes, in the form of knowledge, attitudes and

skills. Activities occurs in adult learning undertaken

to produce a learning experience. However, in order

to gain the maximum experience and consistently

takes other factors that can support learning activities

in a sustainable manner as motivation, environmental

conditions, and support educators in solving

problems that arise in the activities of the learning

process (Romiszowski, A., 1981); (Kelly, C., 1997);

(Healey, M.,andJenkins, A., 2000); (Kolb, D.A et

al.,2001); (Moon, JA, 2004); (Kolb, LM,and Kolb,

DA, 2005); (Roberts, TG, 2006).

Some way view affect achievement and behavior

student, determined by internal factors (individual

student) and external (environment), so influence way

thinking ambition forward after they pass

Heryanto, N., Purnomo, P. and Hasanah, V.

Student’s Self Development in Higher Education.

In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Educational Sciences (ICES 2017) - Volume 2, pages 40-45

ISBN: 978-989-758-314-8

(Ariwibowo, MS, 2013); (Agusta, YN,2015); (Tanis,

H., 2013); (Kulsum TM, 2016). For knowing

character achievement, several institution in

education has apply seven habits indicators (7Habits)

as standard to knowing behavior learner participants.

There are: 1) Be proactive, 2) Begin with the end in

mind, 3) Put first things first, 4) Think win-win, 5)

Seek first to understand and then to be understood, 6)

Synergize, 7) Sharpen the saw, (Covey, SR, 2014);

(Kamphoff, CS, et al., 2007); (Wright, WA, et al.,

199); (Labby, S., et al., 2012); (Goff, DG 2002). This

research aim to reveal behavior or habits that enrich

the student’s academic climate with seven habits

indicators and efforts that is needed to be done in self-

development.

2 RESEARCH METHOD

This research done in the Department Society

Education in Indonesia University of Education. This

research used quantitative descriptive approach, this

approach was used to obtain the data on the behavior

of student assessment results. Measurement of

behavior through observation directly (performance

test) to 64 respondents with 1 semester period, with

the dominant activity appear when lectures activities

and practice activities using seven habits indicators,

namely: 1) Be proactive, 2) Begin with the end in

mind, 3) Put first thing first, 4) Think win-win, 5)

Seek first to understand and then to be understood, 6)

Synergize, 7) Sharpen the saw (Covey, SR, 2014)

following the conversion standard scores are

interpreted as follows:

Table 1: Conversion of Performance Test Scores.

Value Range Score Information

A 3.5 - 4.0 Very goo

B 2.8 - 3.4 Goo

C 2.0 - 2.7 Enough

D 1.0 - 1.9 Less

E 0.0 - 0.9 Very less

For measuring the performance test, data

processing used including:

1. Determining amount of scores, determine the

average score.

2. Determining general trend based on range score.

3 RESULTS OF THE STUDY

Or climatic conditions which facilitate the activities

of college students, of course, provide a snapshot of

the behavior or habit that enrich students' academic

climate. There are several categories of students when

viewed from habit or common in the academic

community colleges, such as: first, the diligent

student in college, but following the organizational

activities of excessive so called "activist campus,"

social life (associate in organizations) tend to be high

, that sometimes his job to learn forgotten. The type

of student like this, tend to be clever in associating,

communicating, even regarded as the most senior

student with the nickname "Timeless Student",

graduation tends to be slow as comfortable as

possible by activities outside campus, but when

graduating, students with this type more survive in the

society. Second, students who have the notion that

college is just as routine activities as course, it is

characterized by habit to come to campus, coming to

the class has the designation in "3D concept, (seated,

silent, listen)" then come back (to the boarding house

or home), with no activity. The type of student, to the

orientation of the most important is the gain value

only, lecture made as formality of obtaining a

diploma, and when it passed, the type of the students

like this, will be difficult to survive, because the

ability of organization skill and the ability of social

relationships is bad, so it tends to be a "handyman

work" instead of as a leader or manager in their work

environment. Third, the student with the criteria of

balance between college with activities outside the

campus (association), they tend to have the ability to

set the time and activities, this practice is carried out

systematically as schedule pressed board on her wall,

good at designing, planning, and tend to be the type

of students upon graduation will eventually sought

and needed by the work environment, even his career

a lot to be a leader or a manager.

The concept of establishing their own potential

and understand the concept of self, is inseparable

from the concept of empowerment. Man's

relationship with others and the environment

(external), is a social creature behavior that indicates

its ability to adapt to the environment or

environmental change as he wishes. While Habit is

defined as a mix between knowledge, skills, and

someone’s desire. Awareness and willingness to

renew it self will shortly cause effective habits. On

this research, the student’s habits obtained from the

relevant faculty ratings of seven indicators.

Based on results observation through performance

test seven habits that shows the average value of all

Student’s Self Development in Higher Education

students in the category of "good". Each indicator

also shows a number that is not much different. The

lowest scores are on be proactive indicator with an

average value of 3.09. However, each component is

in a good category. Students have shown initiative,

enthusiasm to take steps, quick response, and have

made group commitment well. Meanwhile, for

component shows commitment or responsibility still

in enough category. There are still students who can’t

understand a commitments. For the highest score, was

in the synergize indicator with a value of 3.22.

Students have been trying to synergize themselves to

the group. It is seen from the component recognizing

the achievement of the organization as a common

property, appreciating the work together, contribute

to the achievement of group goals, and ready to

combine personal power to the group. Students

appreciate every difference that exists. The

limitations of his understanding are realized to

develop while interacting with others. Following

table 2 which illustrates the average results of the

assessment of student’s performance, as follows:

Table 2: Performance Test Results in Seven Habits.

4 DISCUSSION

Before heading to the ability to empower others, of

course, self-empowerment (personal empowerment)

will be more important. As a creature that has

creativity and initiative, humans are known as a

civilized creature and have a higher degree among

other creatures of God. In determining the direction

of his steps, human beings are required to establish

the principle of himself as a form of maturity or

No Indicato

Com

onent Score Cate

Note

1 Be Proactive

Show initiative

(

not alwa

s waitin

for orders

)

3.11 Goo

3.09

Good

Enthusiasticall

take ste

s3.17Goo

Make commitments with the

rou

3.2 Goo

Shows commitment or res

onsibilit

2.67 Enou

Quick res

onse 3.3 Goo

Begin With

The End in

Mind

Show the final destination clearl

3.2 Goo

3.20

Good

Have the motivation to reach the final

oal 3.16 Goo

Started the action with the

lan 3.22 Goo

Shows actions based on clear objectives 3.23 Goo

First Things

First

Determining priorities in action 3.17 Goo

3.21

Good

Breaking down complex issues becomes easy to

solve

3.17 Good

Announce the unimportant and start the most

important

3.3 Good

Think Win-

Win

Not selfish 3.13 Goo

3.19

Good

Mentoring goodness for others and himself 3.22 Goo

Identify solutions for everyone to enjoy 3.22 Goo

Ready to work with the tea

3.17 Goo

Seek First To

Understand

and Then To

Be Understood

Empathy (feel what others feel) 3.2 Goo

3.19

Good

Listening to others gives an opinion 3.2 Goo

Trying to understand what other people's thoughts

atientl

3.2 Good

Skilfull

communicates o

inions / ideas / ideas 3.17 Goo

6 Synergize

Read

to combine

ersonal

ower with the

rou

3.16 Goo

3.22

Good

Contributing to the achievement of group goals

(organization)

3.2 Good

Appreciate the work togethe

3.22 Goo

Recognize the achievements of the organization as

a common

ert

3.28 Good

Sharpen the

Saw

Want to learn from mistakes 3.31 Goo

3.14

Good

Read

for criticism 2.91 Goo

Improving capability (ability / skill / knowledge)

self

3.09 Good

Maintain intellectual values 3.23 Goo

ICES 2017 - 1st International Conference on Educational Sciences

maturity to himself. According to Hopson and Scally

in Anwar (2007:78) states that More empowered

individuals show open attitudes to change,

assertiveness, proactivity, responsibility, direction,

sensitivity, likes to learn from mistakes, courage to

advance, contemporary, realistic, looking for an

alternative, developing commitment, respect

themselves, evaluating people, being sensitive to the

needs of society, enjoying the crowds, referring to

harmonious, harmonious and balanced lifestyles.

According to Stewart (1994) empowerment is an

internal power quality individual person's personality

or organization to realize and adapt to the

environment to gain an edge for the promotion and

preservation of the future. Whereby empowerment is

conditioned in eight "E" such as, educate (increase

themselves through education), Eliminate (ability to

overcome obstacles), express (express ideas

correctly), enthuse (vitality of life), equip (complete

lack of self), Evaluate (evaluating the work to work),

and expect (hope for the future clear).

Listening to these views, that power or empowerment

is an internal potential. The problem, potential is not

realized by students before stepping on college,

therefore from the initial stage before entering the

campus gate at least students are given mental

provisions in preparing themselves for the potential

they have. At this stage, it is introduced to students in

the form of a "healthy" campus orientation without

any violence or seniority, but rather to prepare

prospective students to receive academic climate.

That is, the external side also gives impact to the

internal changes (individual) itself.

The principle of building this empowerment is

inseparable from the help of others, whether it is a

fellow friend or from the campus itself that needs to

accommodate their potential (students). The concept

of this collectivity, will be more effective when the

principle of help and mutual reminder occurs in the

student learning environment. According to Walgito

(1994), the relationship between the individual and

his environment, especially the social environment is

not only going in the same direction that only the

environment has an influence on the individual, but

between the individual and the environment there is a

reciprocal relationship, such as the environment

influences the individual, and otherwise individuals

also have an influence on the environment.

Furthermore Walgito (1994) explains that the pattern

of relationships or attitudes of individuals to their

environment can be categorized into three forms,

namely:

1. Individual reject environment, that is, if the

individual is not in accordance with the state of

the environment. In such circumstances, the

individual can give shape (change) to the

environment in accordance with what is

expected by the individual concerned.

2. Individual receive environment, such as when

the environmental conditions appropriate or

suitable to individual circumstances. With

thereby individual will receive circumstances

environment.

3. Individual behave neutral or the status quo, for

example, if the individual is not in accordance

with the state of the environment, but people do

not take steps to change the environment. In

such circumstances, the individual is passive

towards the environment.

Thus, in both cases, establishing values oriented

to life and empower themselves (self-empowerment)

is to be aware of the position values of internal and

external. Self-effort in identifying, exploring, and

absorbing information is the first step before building

the environment (the community).

Success someone, never out of effort and effort

made during his life. The profiles of great and

successful people in this country as evidence that

building his potential is not solely obtained from the

recognition alone, but built by the achievement and

able to donate his opinion to the nation and state. In

fact, students are empowered students who are able to

actualize his potential on the positive, able to open

themselves to positive things, clever to evaluate

themselves to what he has done, sociable or

socializing with others and have a high readiness in

the face of the future.

Empower yourself is a step in choosing

perspective (choice) there is a belief that the

individual self, as the analysis is whether we are

(people) are not helpless or be trapped against the

wrong choice. For example, when an individual has a

perception of the belief itself not so talented, it will

encounter a point where it must make an effort to

improve his life or will always afraid to try.

Not separated from the conception of perception

and belief, there are several ways to help individuals

move from the perspective of helplessness, including:

1. Change the situation and conditions

Environment take big effect to development

themselves. Effort for change environment, of

course, is not easy thing and is a struggle which

is considered difficult. Thus, requiring time and

effort for go through everything. For example

one of the students wanted to change the

learning climate in the classroom to be more

proactive and creative, of course need an

agreement that will affect the crowd.

Student’s Self Development in Higher Education

2. Willingness to change oneself

Each individual has their own identity, thus

providing the characteristics or perceptions of

different people. The individual's ability to

evaluate oneself is the most important thing,

because there will be many known deficiencies

or weaknesses in his or her identity. At that

stage, it is necessary that they (students) to

throw away and change themselves from things

that would be considered a weakness for him.

For example: a student is often nicknamed by

his "sleeping" friends in class, this being an

indication that the environment has a negative

perception of him and strives to change himself

to be more diligent, never sleep in class, always

pay attention to lecturers' explanations and be

active in class discussion.

3. Life is creativity

Creative origin of the word creative which

means creativity or have the ability to create. In

this criterion, creativity is not only physical in

nature, but the creativity here is a way to solve

the problems of life, to produce something

useful. Creativity is integrated in everyday life

such as the ability of individuals in managing or

managing the time and activities arranged in

such a way so as not to harm yourself. Many

students are active in the organization but forget

the learning task (active but not productive). For

example: A student who has a habit of doing his

job "Kebut Semalam" to stay up is a bad habit,

in this case the student needs to design time

doing the task so no need to stay up and harm

the health.

4. Face the problem

As social beings who are given the ability to

think, it should not be surrendered and avoided

when experiencing a difficulty or a problem.

Face the problem of life, because with the

problem someone will be more mature and

mature in managing life, responsible for the

actions and actions that do. Example: The

economic problems of students to meet the cost

of living, but embarrassed to entrepreneurship

because of prestige with the title of students.

This prestige factor will hinder the development

itself, but a lot some figures success started with

entrepreneurial success in college.

If the ability of empowerment owned by students

can be managed well, then it will form habit (habit)

to learn, productive, always critical thinking, rich of

idea / idea, ability of socialize and communicate

good, accompanied by soul honest, and able to

account for all his actions. Characteristics of

empowerment owned by students, accompanying the

characteristics of society, because the students are the

smallest part of society who have interests in putting

the ideals and great expectations of family, nation and

religion as the priorities.

5 CONCLUSIONS

The strategic position of Higher Education in

community life is very big, the students as a

component of the campus academic community have

hope that is always eagerly awaited by the society.

The strategic role of youth and students is very

important, in the framework of regional development,

nation and state, as agents of social, economic and

political change. Behind professional academic

ability there is a great responsibility too, so this

becomes the basis in empowering yourself (students).

On the basis of this, the student must be empowered

in making breakthroughs of critical, progressive,

productive attitude of a very expected young man.

It is a duty for Students in the struggle for nation

building. From the beginning until now, students have

always been an integral part of the elements of change

actors in this country.

The most important thing in empowering the

potential of self (students) is to instill the vision of

self-mission as a principle in life. The categories of

students who are considered to have grown up, have

strategic position and potential in empowering

themselves with the principle of divinity and

humanity.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our deepest gratitude to

LPPM UPI (Institute of Research and Community

Service of Indonesia University of Education) for the

research grant.

REFERENCES

Anwar, 2007. Management of Women. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Ariwibowo, M. S., 2013. Effect of Learning Environment

on Student Achievement of PPKn Force 2008/2009

Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Odd Semester Academic

Year 2010/2011. Journal of Citizenship, 1 (2).

Agusta, Y. N., 2015. Relationship between Future

Orientation And Power Juang Readiness To Work On

Final Level Students of the Faculty of Social and

ICES 2017 - 1st International Conference on Educational Sciences

Political Sciences at the University of Mulawarman.

eJournal Psychology. Vol. 3 No. 1 (369-381).

Coal, J. R, 2016. Adolescent development. Sari

Paediatrics, 12 (1), 21-9.

Benson, P. L., 2002. Adolescent development in social and

community context: A program of research. New

Directions for Student Leadership, 2002 (95), 123-

148.

Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., Sealand,

N., 1993. Do neighborhoods influence child and

adolescent development?. American journal of

sociology, 99 (2), 353-395.

Covey, S. R., 2014. The 7 habits of highly effective

families. St. Martin's Press.

Healey, M., Jenkins, A., 2000. Kolb's experiential learning

theory and its application in geography in higher

education. Journal of geography, 99 (5), 185-195.

Kamphoff, C. S., Hutson, B. L., Amundsen, S. A., Atwood,

J. A., 2007. A motivational / empowerment model

applied to students on academic probation. Journal of

College Student Retention: Research, Theory &

Practice, 8 (4), 397-412.

Kulsum, T. M., 2016. Relationship Between Independence

With Job Readiness At Final Year Students (Doctoral

dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya).

Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., Mainemelis, C., 2001.

Experiential learning theory: Previous research and

new directions. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and

cognitive styles, 1 (8), 227-247.

Kolb, A. Y., Kolb, D. A., 2005. Learning styles and learning

spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher

education. Academy of Management learning &

education, 4 (2), 193-212.

Goff, D. G., 2002. Community College Presidency: What

Are The Challenges To Be Encountered and Traits To

Be Successful?.

Kelly, C., 1997. David Kolb, the theory of experiential

learning and ESL. The Internet TESL Journal, 3 (9),

1-5.

Labby, S., Lunenburg, F. C., Slate, J. R., 2012. Emotional

Intelligence and Academic Success: A Conceptual

Analysis for Educational Leaders. International

Journal of educational leadership preparation, 7 (1),

n1.

Noor, N. M., Aaron, J., Aris, B., 2012. Andragogy and

pedagogy learning model preference among

undergraduate students. Procedia-Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 56, 673-678.

Moon, J. A., 2004. A handbook of reflective and

experiential learning: Theory and practice. Psychology

Press.

Paramitasari, R., Alfian, I. N., 2012. The relationship

between emotional maturity and the tendency to forgive

the late teenager. Journal of Educational Psychology

and Development, 1 (02), 1-7.

Rice, P. F., 1996. The adolescent: Development,

relationships and culture. Adolescence, 31 (121),

250.

Roberts, T. G., 2006. A philosophical examination of

experiential learning theory for agricultural education.

Journal of Agricultural Education, 47 (1), 17.

Romiszowski, A., 1981. Designing Instructional System.

London: Kogan Page.

Suharto, E., 2006. Building People Empowering

Communities. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Stewart, Mitchell Allen. 1994. Empowering People.

London: Pitman Publishing.

Tanis, H., 2013. The Importance of Building Character

Education in Shaping Personality of Students.

Humanities, 4 (2), 1212-1219.

Tilaar, H. A. R., 1994. National Education Management.

Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Walgito, Ben. 1994. Social Psychology. Yogyakarta: Andi

Offset.

Wright, W. A., Knight, P. T., Pomerleau, N., 1999.

Portfolio people: Teaching and learning dossiers and

innovation in higher education. Innovative Higher

Education, 24 (2), 89-103.

Student’s Self Development in Higher Education