Students Responsibility Pattern in Indonesia
Adang Suherman
1
, Mulyana Mulyana
1
, Nur Indri Rahayu
1
, Kuston Sultoni
1
and Jajat Jajat
1,2
1
Faculty of Sport and Health Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Setiabudhi No. 229, Bandung, Indonesia
2
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Galuh Ciamis, Jl. RE. Martadinata No. 150, Ciamis, Indonesia
adangsuherman@upi.edu
Keywords: Physical Education, Fitness Education, Self-Concept, Physical Activity, Active Lifestyle.
Abstract: This study aims to determine whether the responsibility of students is influenced by teacher reference value.
In the indicator of participation also tend to be so, judging from the average score between elementary and
junior high school level there is no difference and will increase in SMA level. In self-direction indicator can
be seen pattern average score decrease from elementary to junior high, then at level of high school will
increase sharply. The results of the study indicate that there is a significant difference in student responsibility
between those taught by the patient teacher with strong, moderate and weak TVO.
1 INTRODUCTION
Education is a way of moral quality improvement
(Sheldon and Epstein, 2002). Moral and good
behaviour have the same position even higher than
academic achievement. However, parents, teachers
and society generally agree that good behaviour is as
important as the test score (Sheldon and Epstein,
2002).
Many social organizations claim that giving social
responsibility education is very important. However,
teaching this subject has many obstacles, requiring
the initiative of each individual or group of academic
teachers (Zandvoort, 2013). Students learn about the
responsibilities shown and taught by the adults in
their environment (Cook-Sather, 2010).
Nowadays, there is an increasing interest in the
importance of self-concept physically at a young age,
especially as a recommendation guide to the
participation of physical activity at a young age
(Welk, 1999). The teacher reference value previously
developed by Jewet consists of 5, while the currently
research consists of 8 references as a result of the
development of (Haerens et al., 2011).
Based on these problems, there is a need of an
assessment as an effort to improve the physical self-
concept and active lifestyle of the students through a
comprehensive method in learning sports subject. In
this case the author tries to apply the method of
learning Physical Education to improve physical
fitness (Thomas et al., 2015). This method is designed
one of them with the aim to raise awareness about the
understanding of the physical conditions that exist in
each individual (Proshansky et al., 1983).
Involvement in physical activity has various benefits,
both for physical health, psychological and cognitive,
on the contrary that the lack of movement will have a
negative impact on health. Therefore, there should be
an awareness about the importance of doing physical
activity on a regular basis.
Physical self-concept is an important factor in the
context of a physical intervention program
(Amesberger, 2011). Physical self-concept has a key
role in developing a level of physical fitness that can
allow or not to allow the realization of certain types
of activities within a certain timeframe and which can
increase the positive influence that will occur on one's
health.
Individuals who have positive physical self-
concept will be more physically active, and those
involved in physical activity will have a high physical
self-concept (Arazi and Hosseini, 2013). Thus, the
involvement in physical activity and physical self-
concept are closely related to each other.
2 METHODS
2.1 Procedure
Research was planned to be implemented for eight
months, starting from March to October 2017 at the
Suherman, A., Mulyana, M., Rahayu, N., Sultoni, K. and Jajat, J.
Students Responsibility Pattern in Indonesia.
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Spor ts Science, Health and Physical Education (ICSSHPE 2017) - Volume 2, pages 425-428
ISBN: 978-989-758-317-9
Copyright © 2018 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
425
University of Education Indonesia. The treatment of
this program is during 16 meetings in accordance
with the number of meetings Physics Education held
on UPI students.
‘Randomized post-test only control group
design’ was chosen as a suitable research design to
solve the problem in this study (Campbell and
Stanley, 1963). Each sample group in this design was
taken in a random manner. In this case one group is
given experiment or treatment, and the other group as
control. In this case the experimental group was given
treatment with exploratory fitness education which
was integrated in learning Physics Education in UPI.
The control group used is the students who follow the
learning Physics Education with the usual methods
implemented by the lecturer.
2.2 Instrumentation
Instrument adapted through three stages, namely the
first stage of translation (translate) from English to
Indonesian. The second stage, the translate result then
converted back into English to ensure that its meaning
is unchanged. The next instrument is validated both
in content validity (by linguists and instrument
experts) and construct validity through testing of
respondents.
2.3 Data Analysis
Analysis of the data obtained was done by using
descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. The
processing is by using the software Statistical Product
for Social Science (SPSS) Series. 22. Descriptive
statistical analysis to obtain a description of the
research data, while the use of inferential statistics
aims to answer the formulation of research
hypotheses.
In the data description stage, the authors perform
the descriptive statistical processing which will be
described on the description of data such as mean,
standard deviation, variance, minimum score and
maximum score. Data is presented in two forms,
namely tables and diagrams to further clarify the
description of the data. Hypothesis testing is done by
two-track Anova test (Manova) which aims to test the
difference of influence and interaction between
independent variable with moderator variable.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The study intends to examine whether the pattern of
personal and social responsibility of students is
increasing based on the level of education
(elementary, junior high school) through. In addition
to looking at patterns in each indicator of personal and
social responsibility that consists of respect,
participation and effort, independent and caring.
Table 1. Description of Student Responsibility Data.
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Responsibility
SD
108
91.8056
9.19514
SMP
165
90.6121
12.17334
SMA
330
109.0970
13.54862
Total
603
100.9420
15.37521
Respect
SD
108
13.6389
1.62031
SMP
165
13.6727
2.09867
SMA
330
15.6273
3.10268
Total
603
14.7363
2.80871
Participation
SD
108
29.0833
4.02126
SMP
165
29.2242
4.41775
SMA
330
31.4939
4.45050
Total
603
30.4411
4.51219
Mandiri
SD
108
21.9815
3.73661
SMP
165
19.5636
4.26170
SMA
330
28.6333
5.56330
Total
603
24.9602
6.42760
Caring
SD
108
27.1019
3.27248
SMP
165
28.1515
4.38624
SMA
330
33.3424
5.10149
Total
603
30.8043
5.41177
In Table 1 it is known that the pattern of personal
and social responsibility of students when viewed
from the average score has a fixed pattern from
elementary level to junior high even tended to
decrease although not significant, and increased
rapidly in high school level. If assessed from the
indicator of respect pattern also tends to equal
responsibility, at elementary and junior high school
levels are relatively the same and will increase in
SMA.
In the indicator of participation also tend to be so,
judging from the average score between elementary
and junior high school level there is no difference and
will increase in SMA level. In self-direction indicator
can be seen pattern average score decrease from
elementary to junior high, then at level of high school
will increase sharply.
Last is the caring indicator which, when viewed
from the average score, is likely to experience an
improvement pattern from elementary to junior high,
and so is from junior to senior high school. For more
details about these patterns, the following picture
shows the pattern of each indicator and overall
responsibility.
ICSSHPE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education
426
Figure 1: Overall Responsibility Pattern.
Figure 2: Respect Pattern.
Figure 3: Participation Pattern.
Figure 4: Overall Self-Direction Pattern
Figure 5: Caring Pattern
Figure 1 describes overall responsibility pattern of
level of schooling and mean of responsibility. Figure
2 explains respect pattern of level of schooling and
mean of respect. Figure 3 explains participation
pattern of level of schooling and level of participant.
Figure 4 explains overall responsibility pattern of
level of schooling and level of mean of self-direction.
Figure 5 explains caring pattern of level of schooling
and mean of caring.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The results of the study indicate that there is a
significant difference in student responsibility
between those taught by the patient teacher with
strong, moderate and weak TVO.
Students who were taught by a sexiest teacher
with a weak TVO had a higher responsibility score
Students Responsibility Pattern in Indonesia
427
than the others. The second sequence is a student
taught by a pauper teacher with moderate TVO, and
the last one is a student who is taught by a pseudo
teacher with a strong TVO.
REFERENCES
Amesberger, G., 2011. Physical self-concept and physical
fitness in elderly individuals. Scandinavian Journal
of Medicine and Science in Sports. 21(SUPPL. 1), pp.
8390.
Arazi, H., Hosseini, R., 2013. A Comparison of Physical
Self-Concept between Physical Education and Non -
Physical Education University Students. Timisoara
Physical Education and Rehabilitation Journal.
5(10), pp. 614.
Campbell, D. T., Stanley, J. C., 1963. Experimental and
quasi-experimental designs for research, Rand
McNally. Chicago, Handbook of research on
teaching.
Cook-Sather, A., 2010. Students as learners and teachers:
Taking responsibility, transforming education, and
redefining accountability. Curriculum Inquiry. 40(4),
pp. 555575.
Haerens, L., Kirk, D., Cardon, G., De Bourdeaudhuij, I.,
2011. Toward the development of a pedagogical
model for health-based physical education. Quest.
63(3), 321-338.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., Kaminoff, R., 1983.
Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the
self. Journal of environmental psychology. 3(1), 57-
83.
Sheldon, S. B., Epstein, J. L., 2002. Improving Student
Behavior and School Discipline with Family and
Community Involvement. 35(1).
Thomas, J. R., Silverman, S., Nelson, J., 2015.
Research methods in physical activity, 7E.
Human kinetics.
Welk, G. J., 1999. The youth physical activity promotion
model: a conceptual bridge between theory and
practice. Quest. 51(1), 5-23.
Zandvoort, H., 2013. Editors’ Overview Perspectives on
Teaching Social Responsibility to Students in Science
and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics.
19(4), pp. 14131438.
ICSSHPE 2017 - 2nd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education
428