tourism. The local government is more focused on
forest ecotourism, whereas more potential
ecotourism is marine, mountains and karst. A
number of weaknesses of institutional capability of
West Manggarai Regency in the context of
ecotourism development innovation program can be
identified as follows: 1). Local governments do not
conduct periodic market surveys to identify tourist
populations; 2). The local government is not able to
realize the target of ecotourism development
program in RKPD (Rencana Kerja Pemerintah
Daerah-Local Government Work Plan); 3).
Ecotourism development is unable to accelerate the
economic, social, and ecological development of
communities; 4). The local government has not
created constructive stakeholder participation
because the Bupati has not established the
Coordinating Team for Ecotourism (Tim Koordinasi
Ekowisata) and the Secretariat of Ecotourism
Coordinating Team. Document studies and
interviews with field program managers found that
the Innovative Indigenous Flores Ecotourism for
Sustainable Trade (INFEST) Project and the Project
for the Acceleration of Tourism Development
through Creative Entrepreneurship or Creative
Entrepreneurship Acceleration Tourism and Local
Economic Development (CREATED) Project is a
program of tourism community empowerment in
development innovative ecotourism in which the
objectives and targets of project activities are in line
with the provisions of the Minister of Culture and
Tourism Regulation No. KM.18 / HM.001 / MKP /
2011 on the National Program for Community
Empowerment (PNPM) Mandiri Tourism and
Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number
33 Year 2009 Guidance on Ecotourism
Development in the Region (Menteri Kebudayaan
dan Pariwisata)(Menteri Dalam Negeri). On the
contrary, the legal basis for the management of
ecotourism in Labuan Bajo has not been strong
because the regent does not form the Coordination
Team of Ecotourism and the Secretariat of
Ecotourism Coordination Team in charge of
strategic planning of ecotourism development
according to the Regulation of the Minister of Home
Affairs No.33 of 2009 (Menteri Dalam Negeri).
From the perspective of regional ecotourism
development goal 65.00% does not agree to the
participation of stakeholders in the process of
formulating the program objectives. Because Detail
Engineering Design (DED) of Labuan Bajo
ecotourism management was completed in 2017, it
has not even become a reference of RKPD 2017 and
RKPD 2018.
3.2 Input Components
The Bupati as the main responsibility of the program
has not established the Coordinating Team for
Ecotourism and the Secretariat of Ecotourism
Coordination Team in charge of coordinating and
communicating with ecotourism actors related to
planning strategy, utilization strategy and control
strategy of Labuan Bajo ecotourism. As a result, the
management of Labuan Bajo ecotourism without
strategic planning. The proof, local governments
have not set tariff retribution for 56 ecotourism
destinations from 71 potential destinations. New
retribution rates are issued for 15 ecotourism
destinations with the highest tariff of Rp 20,000 per
person per visit and the lowest rate is Rp 1,000 per
person per visit. There are 50 ecotourism
destinations that have not been fully managed. There
are 14 ecotourism destinations managed by Balai
Taman Nasional Komodo (BTNK). There are 4
ecotourism destinations managed by local investors.
There are 2 ecotourism destinations managed by the
local government. While an ecotourism destination
managed by foreign investors. The local government
only regulates local taxes and levies from hotels on
the mainland. While from the floating inn in the sea
there has been no regulation about local taxes and
regulations, because the agency has no data on the
name and number of floating inn. Though the
number of lodging floats more than hotels on the
mainland. The impact of the management of Labuan
Bajo ecotourism without strategic planning is the
limited development of various aspects of
supporting tourism activities, non-integration of
activities, unclear mechanism procedures, lack of
infrastructure infrastructure, and poor monitoring
and control.
All input issues are from related Bupati and
SKPD that do not provide intensive guidance in
developing ecotourism ecotourism Labuan Bajo in
the form of: guidance / supervision / consultation,
education / training, monitoring, and evaluation.
This is confirmed by respondents' evaluation of the
Head of Region and Head of Culture and Tourism
Office related to strategic leadership capability,
innovative leadership capability and situation
management skills in continuous development of
ecotourism development of Labuan Bajo.
Approximately 67.00% of respondents doubted to
strongly disagree Regional Head and Head of
Department of Culture and Tourism has the skills of
strategic leadership and innovative leadership skills.
Approximately 67.00% of respondents doubted to
strongly disagree Regional Head and Head of