What is the Trigger of Migration Trends in Asia Pacific Region?
Elisabeth K. Yomkondo and Maria M. Niis
Universitas Airlangga
Keywords: Immigrants, trafficking, policy
Abstract: This study explains the elements that trigger migration trends in Asia Pacific. migrants from all of the
nations in the regions hold key role as development actors assist in boosting GDP of their host country,
while also support the family and society in their home countries. Migration will become the engine of
development and growth which are getting higher in this region since the interconnectivity between the
countries is also increased, as well as the demography inequality. The challenge of environment will also
increase pressure to jobs and economic growth will create new opportunities in all over the region. Along
January-August 2017, National Agency for Placement and Protection of Indonesian Workers (BNP2TKI)
has succeeded in placing 148.285 labor force or immigrants to several Countries in Asia Pacific, America,
Middle East, and Europe. The problem is that in some point the mobilization of labor force or migrants tend
to not according to procedures, so that leads to human trafficking problems which become national security
issue. On the other hand, there are also problems regarding the policy, permission, and procedure in
Indonesia government since there are a lot of findings regarding illegal labors. Thus it becomes one of the
concerns of Head of Economist of World Bank towards East Asia region since if the permissions and
procedures can be renewed then Indonesia as the migrants’ sender will receive economic benefits by
sending migration abroad. The issue faced by Indonesia was analyzed by using national security concept
and theory of securitization
1 INTRODUCTION
International migration is a global phenomenon
which can open opportunities for development as
well as challenges for governments. More than 200
million people live out of their home Country or
their nation. Migrations affect almost all of the
aspects of the nation whether it is their home
countries, transit countries, or host countries.
Migrant workers are humans who also have their
own rights which must be fulfilled. Since they do
not possess legal protection in the country where
they are migrating to, international migrant workers
can be vulnerable towards harassment and
exploitation. Legal protection and other kind of
protections must be conducted as assurance for the
fulfillment of labor rights and decent works for
migrant workers. This is due to the view of the
migrants as a group of people who can be exploited
and sacrificed, as cheap labor force, fragile, and
flexible, as well as willing to work in 3-D, dirty,
dangerous, and degrading environment, whereas the
host country is not willing and / or does not want to
accept them. As a result, the rights of migrant
workers are easily abused or abandoned. On the
other hand, migrant workers are contributing to the
development and economic and social welfare of
their home as well as host country. The rights of the
migrants which are violated in a society will
contribute to social disintegration and the decline of
respect for the law. For example, violation and
exploitation towards the migrant workers will
prevent them to obtain decent job and income, which
leads to the reduction for their contribution to the
local society as well as the remittances they may
give to their home countries. Conflict of interest
between economic pressure to exploit the migrants
and the necessity to protect them forces the
government to manage this condition by formulating
and implementing policy carefully and
comprehensively.
Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistic (BPS)
noted the number of poor population (population
with monthly per capita expenditure under the line
of poverty) in Indonesia in March 2015 reached
28.59 million people or 11.22%. The high number of
this population coupled with the low education level
makes a lot of Indonesian citizens especially people
Yomkondo, E. and Niis, M.
What is the Trigger of Migration Trends in Asia Pacific Region?.
DOI: 10.5220/0010275200002309
In Proceedings of Airlangga Conference on International Relations (ACIR 2018) - Politics, Economy, and Security in Changing Indo-Pacific Region, pages 211-218
ISBN: 978-989-758-493-0
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
211
who live in rural area lose in the work competition
to urgently need a decent job with purpose of
improving their family economy. In order to handle
those problems, Indonesian citizens choose to be
Indonesian Migrant Workers (TKI). Becoming a
TKI is one of the shortcuts to find job faster and
achieve higher salary rather than having the same
job in the country. A lot of Indonesians think that
being a migrant worker abroad is better than
becoming a farmer or laborer in Indonesia.
Indonesian Migrant Workers is divided into two
groups. The first group is formal TKI who work in
legal status whether it is from the government or
private. Meanwhile, the second group is the non-
formal TKI who work in individual level such as
housekeeper (PLRT), baby sitter, elderly nurse,
driver or gardener.
2 HISTORY OF MIGRATION
INDO PACIFIC
In the 1990s, international migration is occurring on
an unprecedented scale, involving a wide cross
section of populations and taking on a greater
variety of forms than any time in history. This is
nowhere truer than in the Asian region where rapid
economic growth, inter-country contrasts in the
extent of labor surplus or shortage the transport and
communication revolution and the globalisation
tendencies business activity have seen a burgeoning
of international population flows. Important (and
increasing) element in these movements has been
that of undocumented or illegal migrants. However,
our knowledge of international population
movements within Asia remains limited. Not only is
there uncertainty regarding the underlying causes
and consequences of this movement, but in many
cases the scale and composition of flows is not
known. This of course especially applies to the
burgeoning illegal movement.
It is important to realise that contemporary large-
scale movement from Indonesia Malaysia has strong
historical precedents. Although reports of movement
of Javanese workers to Malaysia go back five
centuries and evidence of movements between
Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula even further, the
movement particularly gained momentum during the
colonial period, especially in the late nineteenth
century. Temporary labor migration was an
important element whereby the resources of the
Netherlands East Indies were exploited by the Dutch
(Hugo, 1982). There were three major types of such
movement: forced migrations to work on
plantations, roads, etc. in which the potential
migrant was given little or no choice; "contract
coolie" migrations in which workers were recruited
to work, usually on a plantation, for a given period
(penal sanctions were applied if the conditions of the
contract were broken); spontaneous migration
whereby the migrant sought work temporarily away
from his/her homeplace either on their own
initiative or through that of friends only or family.
Each of these types of movement has both an
internal and an international component. With
respect to forced movement, besides virtual slavery
in early colonial years, the Romusha forced labor
saw the Japanese occupation forces in the 1940s
transporting Indonesians to work on railway and
other construction projects in Thailand, Burma and
elsewhere. Contract labor gradually came to replace
slavery, corvée and labor in lieu of taxes after 1870.
Recruiters were common in many areas of Java in
colonial times (Hugo, 1975) and significant numbers
of contract workers were sent abroad especially to
the Malay Peninsula (Jackson, 1961) and Surinam,
but also to New Caledonia, Siam (Thailand), British
North Borneo (Sabah), Sarawak, Cochin China
(Vietnam) and even Australia. In the early twentieth
century, the colonial government attempted to stop
the activities of companies recruiting labor for
foreign countries except where specially licensed,
although contract labor recruitment within the
country continued. Accordingly, as a result of
contract coolie movements, by 1930 there were
89,735 Java-born persons living in Malaya (Bahrin,
1967:280) and 170,000 ethnic Javanese residents
(Volkstelling, 1936, VIII:45). There were also 5,237
Java-born persons in British North Borneo (now
Sabah) in 1922 (Scheltema, 1926:874). In addition
to the contract coolie movements of the Java-born,
there were also significant, largely spontaneous
labor movements of Minangkabau, Batak, Bugis,
Banjarese and Bawean migrants to Malaya from
other islands of the Netherlands East Indies.
Labor movements from the Netherlands East
Indies (NEI) to Malaya increased in the 1930s
(Bahrin, 1967) and the major patterns are depicted in
Figure 1. The diagram also shows the distribution of
the birthplaces of Indonesian-born residents of
Malaya recorded at the 1947 Malaya census. The
number of Java-born recorded was 189,450 (an
increase of 111 per cent over the 1930 figure). There
were also 62,400 Banjarese from South Kalimantan
and 26,300 Sumatrans, predominantly Minangkabau,
from West Sumatra and Mandaling Batak from
North Sumatra. The Minangkabau movement was a
ACIR 2018 - Airlangga Conference on International Relations
212
longstanding one with many settling in the Negri
Sembilan area (Hadi, 1981). There were also 20,400
Bawean-born and 7,000 Celebes-born people
identified (Bahrin, 1965:53). These figures of course
only apply to Peninsular Malaysia and it should be
mentioned that there was significant movement from
the NEI into British North Borneo and, to a lesser
extent, Sarawak. The so called "Boyanese" group
presents an interesting case. They come from the
tiny island of Bawean which currently has a
population of around 66,000 and is frequently
known as the "Island of Women". In almost all
households on the island, the male head or a son is
away working in Malaysia or Singapore (Anon.,
1982). This movement has become a rite de passage
in the society for young men to the extent that a
woman is reported to have sought to divorce her
husband on the grounds that he isn't really an adult
man because he has never gone merantau (migrated
temporarily) (Subarkah, Marsidi and Fadjari,
1986:2). This migration is said to date back to links
established with Palembang in the early seventeenth
century when the Sultan of Bawean was converted
to Islam by a missionary from the southern part of
Sumatra. In any case they were recorded as a distinct
group in the Singapore census of 1894 and had
increased to 22,000 by the 1957 census
(Vredenbregt, 1964). They also appear to have
established a Kampung Boyan in Saigon (now Ho
Chi Minh city), Vietnam at the end of the nineteenth
century (Anon., 1982:62). To many (perhaps the
majority) of Bawean men, the Malaya Peninsula or
Singapore has become a tanah air kedua (Anon.,
1982:62) or second native country.
This is admittedly a somewhat extreme case but
it does indicate the extent of migratory links
between parts of Indonesia and Malaysia-Singapore
which have existed for a long period of time. This
can be further underlined by the fact that in 1982
when the Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister (Datuk
Musa Hitam) made an official visit to Jakarta for
negotiations regarding a "Supply of Workers
Agreement" with Indonesia, he mentioned that his
grandmother was a Bugis born in Ujung Pandang,
South Sulawesi (Anon., 1982:64). The important
point here is that there are long-standing and strong
social networks linking Malaysia and Indonesia. The
political boundaries separating the two nations are a
function of colonisation and separate peoples who
share the same culture, language and religion. These
historical linkages and cultural homogeneity have
played an important role in facilitating population
movement from Indonesia to Malaysia. During
World War II and early post-Independence years,
the flow of labor migrants from Indonesia to
Malaysia subsided, especially in the years of
Confrontation. However, beginning in the early
1970s, shortages of labor in the plantation,
agricultural and construction sectors saw the
beginnings of illegal flows of Indonesians into both
Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysia (Dorall and
Paramasivam, 1992:13).
3 ASIA PACIFIC MIGRATION IN
GLOBAL PRESPECTIVE
This section puts migration in the Asia-Pacific
region in a global context and explores the major
reasons why migration in the region is likely to
increase before it decreases. The major points
include; 1. Asia is different in both perception and
reality. One perception is that, just as some Asian
countries managed to achieve very rapid economic
growth, some may succeed in managing labor
migration more successfully than governments in
other parts of the world; 2. Policies of migrant-
receiving countries vary significantly, with the
triangle of policies framed by Singapore’s welcome
the skilled and rotate the low-skilled, Japan’s largely
closed doors to low-skilled foreign workers, and the
dependence of Gulf oil exporters on migrants to fill
90 percent of private-sector jobs; 3. Policies of
migrant-sending countries are more similar, with
many governments aiming to send more skilled
workers to destinations inside and outside Asia and
to measure the development impacts of migration
using the single indicator of remittances.
The Asia-Pacific region, home to almost 60
percent of the world’s people, is unusual in dealing
with migration in three major respects. First, there is
a widespread sense inside and outside the region that
Asia is different. There are many reasons, including
the Asian economic miracle that catapulted several
countries from poorer to richer in a relatively short
time (World Bank, 1993). This economic success
may encourage some Asian leaders to believe that
they can achieve another success in managing
internal and international labor migration to achieve
goals that include protecting migrants and local
workers, enhancing cooperation between
governments in labor-sending and –receiving areas
to better manage migration, and ensuring that
migration promotes development in labor-sending
areas.
Second, there is more diversity in national labor
migration policies than in national economic
What is the Trigger of Migration Trends in Asia Pacific Region?
213
policies. The policy extremes can be approximated
by a triangle. Singapore lies at one corner
welcoming professionals to settle with their families
while rotating less-skilled foreign workers in and out
of the country. Japan lies at another corner, allowing
but not recruiting foreign professionals and
preferring ethnic Japanese from Latin America as
well as foreign trainees, students, and unauthorized
workers to guest workers with full labor market
rights. The Gulf Cooperation Council countries
represent a third corner, relying on migrants for over
90 percent of private-sector workers, requiring
migrants to have citizen-sponsors, and recently
announcing policies to cooperate with migrant-
sending countries to assure returns. The contrast
between the similar investment-intensive and export-
led economic policies of East and Southeast Asian
nations, and the dis-similar labor migration policies,
is striking.
Third, there appears to be convergence in the
migration policies of labor-sending governments in
the region. Most want to send more workers abroad,
to increase the share of skilled workers among
migrants, and to diversify the destinations of
migrants to include more European and North
American destinations. To achieve these marketing,
up skilling, and diversification goals, many Asian
governments have established ministries or agencies
to promote and protect migrants, with promotion
accomplished by ministerial visits and protection via
regulation of private-sector recruiters and pre-
departure reviews of the contracts they offer to
migrants. The evolving migrant promotion and
protection infrastructure often assumes that
development is a natural or inevitable outgrowth of
sending more workers abroad, so that remittances
can serve as the major indicator of migration’s
development impacts. This may not be true.
4 WHY PEOPLE MIGRATE
International migration is usually a carefully
considered individual or family decision. The major
reasons to migrate to another country can be
grouped into two categories: economic and
noneconomic, while the factors that encourage a
migrant to actually cross borders fall into three
categories: demand-pull, supply-push, and networks.
An economic migrant may be encouraged to move
by employer recruitment of guest workers, demand-
pull, while migrants crossing borders for economic
reasons may be moving to escape unemployment or
low wages, supply push factors.
These factors are listed in the table below. A
worker in rural Indonesia may decide to migrate to
Malaysia because a friend or relative tells him of a
job, highlighting the availability of higher wage jobs
as a demand-pull factor. The worker may not have a
regular job at home or face debts from a family
member’s medical emergency, examples of supply-
push factors that encourage emigration. Networks
encompass everything from moneylenders who
provide the funds needed to pay a smuggler to
employers or friends and relatives at the destination
who help migrants to find jobs and places to live
Table 1: Factors Influencing Migrations, Factors Encouraging an Individual to Migrate
Demand-pull, supply-push, and network factors
rarely have equal weights in an individual migration
decision, and their weights can change over time.
Generally, demand-pull and supply push factors are
strongest at the beginnings of a migration flow, and
network factors become more important as
migration streams mature. The first migrant workers
are often recruited by employers, and their presence
is approved or tolerated by governments. The
demonstration effect of some migrants returning to
their areas of origin with savings can prompt more
people to seek foreign jobs. Network factors ranging
ACIR 2018 - Airlangga Conference on International Relations
214
from friends and relatives settled abroad to the
expectation that especially young men and women
are expected to seek opportunity abroad can sustain
labor migration between poorer and richer areas
within and between countries.
5 MIGRANT SECURITY,
PERMISSIONS, AND
PROCEDURE THEORY
SCHEME
Indonesian migrant workers or basically all the
migrants help delivering dividend to the country.
TKI and immigrants indirectly possess important
role towards Indonesian economic development.
However, sometimes they are receiving problems
when they are working abroad so that the nation is
obliged to protect all of its citizens both inside and
outside the country. Actually there are already many
efforts which have been done by the Indonesian
government in reducing the number violence and
other violations which afflict the TKI and
immigrants. Those policies came up in several
governmental policies which were written in the
Constitution, government regulations, and other
ministerial regulations. However, even though there
are a lot of policies issued by Indonesian
governments in protecting Indonesian Migrant
Workers, the implementations of the protection
which were created are not able to protect the
Indonesian Migrant Workers whether in the pre
placement, placement, and the after placement stage.
Regarding the human security terminology,
Alberth and Carlsson (2009:23-24) collaborated it
with the human security through narrow human
security approach (human security in narrow
meaning) and broad human security (human security
in broad meaning). Narrow human security is related
to the actions which include the absence of
individual/personal threat (personal violence), and
consequently affect the absence of structural
violence threats. These two threats’ criteria actually
fulfill the primary category and inclusion criteria
regarding the ownership of emancipatory power.
Both of the absences of personal and structural
violence threat are the main power of emancipatory
concept. Broad human security should be consistent
to the critical security study. Therefore, critical
security study should be related to human security in
policy-making.
Security threats towards humans are becoming
significant to be the object of Security Studies which
are free from nation-state security dichotomy
through the field of traditional security (military)
and non-traditional security (non-military). Thus, the
factors of human freedom from various threats and
pressures, either militaristic or non-militaristic, are
the shifting form of Security Studies object which is
reflecting the shift of armed conflict nowadays.
Threats towards the damage of human security
existence is becoming wide open when referring to
United Nation’s Millennium Declaration and the
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In order
to assure human security in the MDGs framework,
then the goals to be built are (www.unocha.org,
2014: 2-3):
1. Protecting humans from crime conflicts
2. Protecting and empowering humans/citizens
related to migrations caused by conflict/war or
crime against human rights
3. Protecting and empowering humans related to
post-conflict conditions.
4. Economy security related to the abolishment of
poverty, improvement of economic level and
social welfare.
5. Ensuring health for human security spread of
disease and poverty threats as the impacts from
conflict; and
6. Improving knowledge, skill and value for human
security: providing basic education facility and
public information related to those three things
which relevant to the forms of crime resulted
from conflicts.
The focus shift in the study of traditional security
in becoming non-traditional security is actually
transforming a new form of war in each actor which
poses threats towards human security existence.
Attention towards human security has become one
kind of attention regarding the importance of global
security which has been generalized into six human
security outputs according to United Nations
Development Programs (UNDP). New kind of war
or future war will be more triggered by the six
purposes of human security.
In 2003 to 2005, Saudi Arabia was the most
favorite destination followed by Malaysia. In this
period there was a change in the third most favorite
destination which used to be Kuwait in 2003-2004
but then became the fifth most favorite after Taiwan
became the third most favorite and Singapore
became the fourth most favorite. In 2006, Saudi
Arabia still became the most favorite destination by
the majority of Indonesian job seekers but at Asia-
Pacific region in 2007, Malaysia became the most
favorite destination followed by Taiwan and Hong
Kong. Meanwhile, there are a lot of authors who
What is the Trigger of Migration Trends in Asia Pacific Region?
215
argued about the reason why the migrants chose
Malaysia as their most favorite destination. The
main reason for that is related to distance followed
by the cultural aspects which have many similarities.
Several studies showed that there were a significant
number of undocumented migrants especially the
ones going to Malaysia. These migrant workers were
going through two main routes; they are East Java-
North and South Sumatera to Malaysia Peninsular
and Flores-South Sulawesi to Sabah
(www.unesco.org/most/amprnwp8.htm). In the
process of the TKI/immigrants undocumented
delivery, there were several actors which were
allowing this to happen such as the brokers
syndicate, labor force recruiters, and taikong
(helmsman). Their involvement brought several
consequences such as the more expensive fees which
were paid by the workers and minimal protection for
them. There are a lot of cases which indicate that the
most problems faced by the migrant workers are
because of the departure done by this method.
There are around 6 million Indonesian citizens
who are currently abroad, where 80% of them are
Indonesian Migrant Workers. The majority of those
TKI are the people who work in non-formal sectors
or domestic workers. Those TKI are spreading into
160 countries and it is estimated that there are 1.2
million TKI who are illegal or the TKI who depart to
other countries via illegal method. The majority of
TKI who work in non-formal sectors is reflecting the
low-skill level which those TKI possess. The
majority of those TKI are also women who only
have junior high school or even elementary school
background. According to the Research Center for
the Development and Information of National
Agency for Placement and Protection of Indonesian
Migrant Workers (BNP2TKI), there are 351,639
TKI who have only junior high or even elementary
school background from the total of 521,168 TKI in
2013. The levels of education which the TKI possess
were also in line with the majority of their own
professions as housemaid more than any other
professions. There were 168.318 TKI whose
profession were housemaid in 2013, showing an
increase of the number in 20120 which was 164.981.
The limitation of education these TKI possessed
caused this group of workers to be more vulnerable
against issues that may happen to them, especially
the ones who work in domestic worker sectors.
The countries which have become the most
favorite destinations for Indonesian Migrant
Workers in 2012 were Malaysia with 1.9 million
people, followed by Saudi Arabia with 1.1 million
people, and Hong Kong with 189 thousand people.
Saudi Arabia became the second most favorite
destination because of religious reason since Saudi
Arabia was viewed as home for Muslims, thus
encouraging the TKI to choose Saudi Arabia while
at the same time the Muslims could also visit the
Kaaba to make Kaaba pilgrimage. While Malaysia
became the biggest TKI receiver because of the
geographical factor where Indonesia is directly
bordered with Malaysia and some of the citizens are
from Melayu Race with similar language. The
income that the TKI generated poses significant
impact to Indonesian government through
remittance. In 2013, the total of Indonesian
remittances from its TKI reached 88 Trillion rupiah.
Malaysia and Saudi Arabia are two dominant
countries who contribute in remittance more than
any other countries which become the destinations
for the TKI. TKI holds important role which aimed
to improve their families in Indonesia while being
vulnerable against the risks that may happen to them
anytime and anywhere. Working abroad by
becoming TKI is not without risks and obstacles.
Instead, the risks are far greater than working in
their own country. A lot of Indonesian Migrant
Workers especially the ones who work in informal
sectors to become victims in various criminal and
violent activities such as overwork, unpaid salary,
even violence that poses threat to their own lives. As
Indonesian President, Joko Widodo has set three
diplomacy priorities i.e. by maintaining Indonesia
sovereignty, improving the protection of the citizens
and Indonesian legal entities, and increasing
economic diplomacy. The President has placed the
citizen’s protection issue as Indonesia’s priority
agenda which means Indonesian foreign politic must
be able to give protection and safety for citizens and
legal entities of Indonesia in other countries.
According to VOA Indonesia (2014), Indonesia
President Joko Widodo has recently issued
presidential instruction regarding repatriation for the
problematic and undocumented TKI in several
countries. Since there were a lot of problematic and
undocumented TKI who were working in Malaysia,
the government chose this neighbor country as the
first country where the repatriation conducted. Up
until now the government has succeeded in
repatriating 703 problematic TKI from the estimated
total of 1428 people. They were carried gradually by
using five Hercules aircraft owned by Indonesian
National Air force. The chief of BNP2TKI Nusron
Wahid stated that the government is extremely
serious in solving the TKI issues.
Protection towards Indonesian Migrant Workers
(TKI) is basically the government’s responsibility.
ACIR 2018 - Airlangga Conference on International Relations
216
However, this task is specifically handled by
Ministry of Labor and Transmigration together with
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Due to the complicated
process and the number of requirements, the
government then attempted to manage this issue by
creating BNP2TKI in order to help the protection
issue faced by the TKI based on Law No. 39 of 2004
which was regulated by Presidential Decree No. 81
of 2006. This led to the formation of three National
bodies which relate and intersect to each other
regarding the Indonesian Migrant Workers’
protection namely Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Ministry of Labor and Transmigration, and National
Agency for Placement and Protection of Indonesian
Migrant Workers (BNP2TKI). Even though
according to one of BNP2TKI staffs who work in
protection deputy field there are actually 13
stakeholders related to the TKI protection such as
National Police, Ministry of Law and Human Rights
and other ministries, the most related bodies in
handling this issue are the BNP2TKI, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Labor and
Transmigration.
6 DISCUSSION
As discussed above, the number of Indonesian
migrants abroad has been increasing recently and the
Indonesian Government has paid increased attention
to the labour migration process and how Indonesian
labour migrants are recruited, deployed and treated
in the destination countries. As a result, a number of
public policies have been enacted to better manage
the migration of Indonesian labour migrants. Broad
public interest in cases of mass deportation of
Indonesian labour migrants from Malaysia has also
caused civil society to put pressure on the
Government of Indonesia to strengthen legislation
that protects Indonesian labour migrants.
Economic reasons drive the majority of
Indonesian labour migrants to migrate abroad, to
improve the economic status of themselves and their
families. High levels of unemployment and
underemployment in Indonesia push many
individuals to look for jobs outside their area of
origin and many may decide to go abroad after
hearing about the availability of jobs from
recruitment agents and social networks and the
higher salaries on oer abroad in countries such as
Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Hong Kong SAR, Kuwait,
Singapore and the United Arab Emirates. Many
individuals, especially women, see migration abroad
as the only way out of poverty for them and their
families. Most workers therefore migrate with the
intention of working abroad for only a limited period
of time in order to save enough money to purchase a
house, open a business or send their children or
relatives to school. Although labour migration from
Indonesia is characterized as temporary because few
migrants leave with the intention of settling in the
destination country, they generally do not have the
opportunity to stay even if they change their mind.
Nevertheless, due to the high costs often associated
with securing overseas employment, temporary
labour migration often turns into a stay that is longer
than expected and may last several years.
7 CONCLUSION
In the end, all of those questions will never give
ontological positioning answer in line with the
dynamics shifting of security issues variant. This
indicates that when it is reviewed as a security
concept, then human security produces various
interpretations that can be viewed from several
points of view of power interest and order whether
the interest is conducted by state actor, non-state
actor institution, or even in individual level. In that
sense, then human security today which was resulted
from the shift of Post-Cold War security issue is
dominated by non-state actors.
The lack of protection towards migrant workers
is because of three main factors. Those main factors
are the fragility of infrastructure of TKI protection in
other countries, the overlapping policies among the
involved stakeholders, and the legal protection
policy which is still reactive. The involved
stakeholders’ overlapping policies in this context are
the policies created by BNP2TKI, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Labor and
Transmigration. This factor is reinforced by the
argument which stated that there are overlapping
laws. The second argument which reinforced the
second factor is the law related to tasks and
responsibility which are not professional yet. The
third factor which stated the reason why the migrant
workers’ protection is still reactive is due to the
reactive nature of the law. The government until
today is just solving the already-happening problems
while not totally trying to solve the source of the
problem itself.
What is the Trigger of Migration Trends in Asia Pacific Region?
217
REFERENCES
Journal
Graeme Hugo . Indonesian Labour Migration to Malaysia:
Trends and Policy Implications. Southeast Asian
Journal of Social Science. Journal Jstor. Vol.2, No.1
1993.
Hidayat Rizal. Keamanan Manusia Dalam Perspektif Studi
Keamanan Kritis Terkait Perang Intra-Negara. Journal
of International Studies. Vol.2, No.1 2017
Arry Bainus dan Junita. Editorial; Keamanan
Internasional. Journal of International Studies. Vol.2,
No.1 2017
Martin,Philip. Migration in the Asia-Pacifc Region:
Trends, factors, impacts. Munich Personal RePEc
Archive. UNDP Research Paper 2009.
Sejati, P. Satryo. Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia di
Luar Negeri. Journal of Muhammadiyah University of
Yogyakarta, 2015.
Sukamdi. Memahami Migrasi Pekerja Indonesia ke Luar
Negeri. University of Gadjah Mada, 2007. [artikel ini
adalah artikel revisi dari makalah dalam seminar
Launching State of World Population, 2006]
Internet
VOA Indonesia, Pemerintahan Jokowi Lakukan
Terobosan Selesaikan Masalah TKI [online]
https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/pemerintahan-
jokowi-lakukan-terobosan-selesaikan-masalah-
tki/2573013.html
ACIR 2018 - Airlangga Conference on International Relations
218