the practice such as land clearing, forest fire is
consider necessary thing and that is why it is
important to keep this situation.
Besides, THP that occurs each year causes as
many as 200 million people to have eye infections
and respiratory disorders due to the harmful
chemicals contained by THP, Singapore's Pollutant
Standard Index (PSI) also reported that its citizens
experience unhealthy air pollution in the 95-107
range. In addition, the economic sector is also
affected by THP, as much as $ 9.4 million of losses
experienced by Indonesia and $ 263 million by
Singapore, which is the majority of the tourism and
transportation sectors. While the indirect impacts
that can be felt both in the short and long term that
deforestation in the form of forest fires for land
clearing conducted in forests of Kalimantan and
Sumatra contribute 40% of total global greenhouse
gas (EGK) emissions that impact on global climate
change because Indonesia's tropical rain forest is one
of the world's lungs. This does not only cause unrest
for ASEAN countries but also countries at the global
level. Besides, health effects due to air impurities,
air toxins such as respiratory system, cardiovascular
system, nervous system, digestive and urinary
system, and exposure during pregnancy are another
side effects.
Apart from the government neglecting, this
human security threat has a short and long term
potential from the parties involved. As we define the
new term of human security based on UNDP
definition, in the global era the term has proliferated
in so many forms. The cooperation from every
actors is important so that all the efforts that has
been done so far was not a symbolic effort.
5 CONCLUSIONS
THP is a new threat to human security because it can
affect human freedom in this case is global civil
society. Such threats include the threat of freedom of
breath of clean air that affects the health, threats of
freedom of desire, economic threats and further
threats to environmental degradation. The limitation
of human desire free from fear is the main indicator
of human security. So the case is no longer an issue
within the local sphere of ASEAN but furthermore it
is a global problem that has global impact.
THP problem is a form of insecurity in non-
traditional approaches tangible Economic Security,
Enviromental Security, Social and Health Security,
Biodiversity across national borders. THP efforts to
resolve through the multilateral environmental
regimes, international organizations and the state
have not been able to cope and stop THP because
there is still economic and political interest behind it.
If the country involved in Indonesia as a major
contributor to THP, Malaysia and Singapore as
affected countries not only ratifies the agreed
agreement but also implements the results of the
agreement, then this problem will most likely be
resolved. Government involvement, the private
sector and civil society are urgently needed in this
case. The authors suggest that an agreed, hard-law
THP agreement, policy and law be formulated
between Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore that can
be truly applied in addressing human security and
environmental issues. Thus, in the case of this paper
the authors conclude that globalization in the form
of international regimes, IGOs, NGOs leads to an
increasingly diverse insecurity not only to a
peaceful, non-war state, but to create new variables
such as ecological, biodiversity and environmental
degradation global. Even this case is not consider
new, but the problem is still there and can still occur
in the near future.
REFERENCES
Alam, S. and Nurhidayah, L., 2017. The international law
on transboundary haze pollution: What can we learn
from the Southeast Asia region?. Review of European,
Comparative & International Environmental Law,
26(3), pp.243-254.
Fukuda-Parr, S., 2003. New threats to human security in
the era of globalization. Journal of Human
Development, 4(2), pp.167-179.
Heilmann, Daniel 2015. After Indonesia’s Ratification:
The ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary
HazePollution and Its Effectiveness As a Regional
Environmental Governance Tool. Journal of Current
Southeast Asian Affairs vol 34, 3, 95–121. GIGA
German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Institute
of Asian Studies and Hamburg University Press.
Jones, D.S., 2006. ASEAN and transboundary haze
pollution in Southeast Asia. Asia Europe Journal,
4(3), pp.431-446.
Kaldor, M., Martin, M. and Selchow, S., 2007. Human
security: a new strategic narrative for Europe.
International affairs, 83(2), pp.273-288.
Lipschutz, Ronnie D. 2004. Global Environmental
Politics: Power, Perspective, and Practice.
Washington: CQ Press.
Lohman, D.J., Bickford, D. and Sodhi, N.S., 2007. The
burning issue. Science(Washington), 316(5823), p.376.
Nazeer, N. and Furuoka, F., 2017. Overview of ASEAN
Environment, Transboundary Haze Pollution
Agreement And Public Health. International Journal
of Asia-Pacific Studies, 13(1).