![](bgb.png)
REFERENCES
Allen, J. (1999). s.v. Kunst. Der Neue Pauly (DNP), Bd.
6:Sp. 915–919.
Barth, L., Kobourov, S., and Pupyrev, S. (2014). Experi-
mental Comparison of Semantic Word Clouds. In Ex-
perimental Algorithms, volume 8504 of Lecture Notes
in Computer Science, pages 247–258. Springer Inter-
national Publishing.
Bateman, S., Gutwin, C., and Nacenta, M. (2008). Seeing
Things in the Clouds: The Effect of Visual Features
on Tag Cloud Selections. In Proceedings of the Nine-
teenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hyperme-
dia, HT ’08, pages 193–202. ACM.
Beavan, D. (2008). Glimpses though the clouds: collocates
in a new light. In Proceedings of the Digital Humani-
ties 2008.
Beavan, D. (2011). ComPair: Compare and Visualise the
Usage of Language. In Proceedings of the Digital Hu-
manities 2011.
Binder, J. M. and Jennings, C. (2014). Visibility and mean-
ing in topic models and 18th-century subject indexes.
Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(3):405–411.
Burch, M., Lohmann, S., Beck, F., Rodriguez, N., Di Sil-
vestro, L., and Weiskopf, D. (2014). RadCloud: Vi-
sualizing Multiple Texts with Merged Word Clouds.
In Information Visualisation (IV), 2014 18th Interna-
tional Conference on, pages 108–113.
Castell
`
a, Q. and Sutton, C. (2014). Word Storms: Multi-
ples of Word Clouds for Visual Comparison of Docu-
ments. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Con-
ference on World Wide Web, WWW ’14, pages 665–
676. ACM.
Cheema, M. F., J
¨
anicke, S., Blumenstein, J., and Scheuer-
mann, G. (2016a). A Directed Concept Search En-
vironment to Visually Explore Texts Related to User-
defined Concept Models. In Proceedings of the 11th
Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and
Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, pages
72–83.
Cheema, M. F., J
¨
anicke, S., and Scheuermann, G. (2016b).
AnnotateVis: Combining Traditional Close Reading
with Visual Text Analysis. In Workshop on Visual-
ization for the Digital Humanities, IEEE VIS 2016,
Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Collins, C., Viegas, F., and Wattenberg, M. (2009). Par-
allel Tag Clouds to explore and analyze faceted text
corpora. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology,
2009. VAST 2009. IEEE Symposium on, pages 91–98.
Cui, W., Liu, S., Tan, L., Shi, C., Song, Y., Gao, Z., Qu,
H., and Tong, X. (2011). TextFlow: Towards Better
Understanding of Evolving Topics in Text. Visualiza-
tion and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on,
17(12):2412–2421.
Cui, W., Liu, S., Wu, Z., and Wei, H. (2014). How Hier-
archical Topics Evolve in Large Text Corpora. Visu-
alization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions
on, 20(12):2281–2290.
Cui, W., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Wei, F., Zhou, M., and Qu, H.
(2010). Context preserving dynamic word cloud vi-
sualization. In Pacific Visualization Symposium (Paci-
ficVis), 2010 IEEE, pages 121–128.
Diakopoulos, N., Elgesem, D., Salway, A., Zhang, A., and
Hofland, K. (2015). Compare Clouds: Visualizing
Text Corpora to Compare Media Frames. In Proc. of
IUI Workshop on Visual Text Analytics.
Eisenstein, J., Sun, I., and Klein, L. F. (2014). Ex-
ploratory Thematic Analysis for Historical Newspaper
Archives. In Proceedings of the Digital Humanities
2014.
Fankhauser, P., Kermes, H., and Teich, E. (2014). Combin-
ing Macro- and Microanalysis for Exploring the Con-
strual of Scientific Disciplinarity. In Proceedings of
the Digital Humanities 2014.
Gansner, E. R., Hu, Y., and Kobourov, S. (2010). Gmap: Vi-
sualizing graphs and clusters as maps. In 2010 IEEE
Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), pages
201–208.
Gibbs, F. and Owens, T. (2012). Building Better Digital Hu-
manities Tools: Toward broader audiences and user-
centered designs. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 6(2).
Gleicher, M., Albers, D., Walker, R., Jusufi, I., Hansen,
C. D., and Roberts, J. C. (2011). Visual Comparison
for Information Visualization. Information Visualiza-
tion, 10(4):289–309.
Harrower, M. and Brewer, C. A. (2003). ColorBrewer.org:
An Online Tool for Selecting Colour Schemes for
Maps. The Cartographic Journal, 40(1):27–37.
Havre, S., Hetzler, E., Perrine, K., Jurrus, E., and Miller, N.
(2001). Interactive Visualization of Multiple Query
Results. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on
Information Visualization 2001 (INFOVIS’01), INFO-
VIS ’01, pages 105–, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE
Computer Society.
Hearst, M. and Rosner, D. (2008). Tag Clouds: Data Anal-
ysis Tool or Social Signaller? In Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the
41st Annual, pages 160–160.
Hinrichs, U., Alex, B., Clifford, J., Watson, A., Quigley, A.,
Klein, E., and Coates, C. M. (2015). Trading Con-
sequences: A Case Study of Combining Text Mining
and Visualization to Facilitate Document Exploration.
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities.
Hinrichs, U., Forlini, S., and Moynihan, B. (2016). Spec-
ulative Practices: Utilizing InfoVis to Explore Un-
tapped Literary Collections. Visualization and Com-
puter Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 22(1):429–
438.
J
¨
anicke, S. (2016). Valuable Research for Visualization and
Digital Humanities: A Balancing Act. In Workshop
on Visualization for the Digital Humanities, IEEE VIS
2016, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J
¨
anicke, S., Efer, T., Blumenstein, J., W
¨
ockener-Gade, E.,
Schubert, C., and Scheuermann, G. (2016a).
¨
Uber die
Nutzung von TagPies zur vergleichenden Analyse von
Textdaten. In Konferenzabstracts der Digital Human-
ities im deutschsprachigen Raum 2016.
J
¨
anicke, S., Franzini, G., Cheema, M. F., and Scheuermann,
G. (2015). On Close and Distant Reading in Digi-
tal Humanities: A Survey and Future Challenges. In
IVAPP 2018 - International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications
50