![](bgb.png)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge discussions,
contributions, and helpful suggestions from Aneta
Vulgarakis, Rafia Inam, Carlos Azevedo,
Konstantinos Vandikas, Leonid Mokrushin, Ricardo
Souza, Elena Fersman, and Martin Törngren.
The research leading to these results has received
funding from the “SCOTT - Secure Connected
Trustable Things.” SCOTT (www.scottproject.eu)
has received funding from the Electronic
Component Systems for European Leadership Joint
Undertaking under grant agreement No. 737422.
This Joint Undertaking receives support from the
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme and Austria, Spain, Finland,
Ireland, Sweden, Germany, Poland, Portugal,
Netherlands, Belgium, and Norway.
REFERENCES
Anderson, J. R. (1996) ‘ACT: A simple theory of complex
cognition.’, American Psychologist, 51(4), pp. 355–
365. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.355.
Avraamides, M. N. and Ritter, F. E. (2002) ‘Using
Multidisciplinary Expert Evaluations to Test and
Improve Cognitive Model Interfaces’, pp. 553–562.
Azevedo, C. R. B., Raizer, K., Souza, R. and Rohmer, E.
(2016) ‘Multi-Objective Autonomous Robotics for
Management and Operations of Complex Logistics
Systems’. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/
project/Multi-Objective-Autonomous-Robotics-for-
Management-and-Operations-of-Complex-Logistics-
Systems.
Basile, F., Chiacchio, P. and Coppola, J. (2016) ‘A Cyber-
physical view of automated warehouse systems’, in
Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2016
IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 407–
412. doi: 10.1109/COASE.2016.7743434.
Cassimatis, N. L. (2006) ‘A Cognitive Substrate for
Achieving Human-Level Intelligence’, AI Magazine,
27(2), pp. 45–56. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v27i2.1879.
Clayton, M. J. (1997) ‘Delphi: a technique to harness
expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in
education’, Educational Psychology, 4(17), pp. 373–
386.
Councill, I. G., Haynes, S. R. and Ritter, F. E. (2003)
‘Explaining Soar: Analysis of Existing Tools and User
Information Requirements’, Proceedings of the Fifth
International Conference on Cognitive Modeling,
63468, pp. 1–6.
Drever, E. (1995) Using Semi-Structured Interviews in
Small-Scale Research. A Teacher’s Guide.
Ernst, G. W. and Newell, A. (1969) GPS: A case study in
generality and problem solving. New York, New
York, USA: Academic Press.
Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M. and Sjoberg, G. (1991) A case
for the case study. Chapel Hill: University of North
Carolina Press Books.
Fidel, R. (1984) ‘The Case Study Method: A Case Study’,
Library and Information Science Research, 6(3), pp.
273–288.
Franklin, S. and Patterson, F. G. (2006) ‘The LIDA
architecture: Adding new modes of learning to an
intelligent, autonomous, software agent’, Integrated
Design and Process Technology, pp. 1–8. Available
at: http://ccrg.cs.memphis.edu/assets/papers/zo-1010-
lida-060403.pdf.
Freed, M. A., Shafto, M. G. and Remington, R. W. (1999)
‘Employing simulation to evaluate designs: The
APEX approach’, in Engineering for Human-
Computer Interaction. Boston, MA: Springer US, pp.
207–223. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-35349-4_12.
Georgeff, M. P. and Lansky, A. L. (1986) ‘Procedural
knowledge’, Proceedings of the IEEE, 74(10), pp.
1383–1398. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1986.13639.
Goodman, B. and Flaxman, S. (2016) ‘EU regulations on
algorithmic decision-making and a “right to
explanation”’, in 2016 ICML Workshop on Human
Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI 2016), pp.
26–30. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08813.
Gürdür, D. (2016) Making Interoperability Visible: A
Novel Approach to Understand Interoperability in
Cyber‐Physical Systems Toolchains. KTH Royal
Institute of Technology.
Hur, S., Lee, Y. H., Lim, S. Y. and Lee, M. H. (2004) ‘A
performance estimation model for AS/RS by M/G/1
queuing system’, Computers and Industrial
Engineering, 46(2), pp. 233–241. doi:
10.1016/j.cie.2003.12.007.
International Organization for Standardization (2016) ISO:
ISO/TS 15066:2016: Robots and robotic devices –
Collaborative robots. Geneva, Switzerland.
Jones, R. M. (1999) ‘Graphic visualization of situation
awareness and mental state for intelligent computer-
generated forces’, Proceedings of the Eighth
Conference on Computer Generated Forces and
Behavioral Representations, (May), pp. 219–222.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A. and Varma, S. (1999)
‘Computational modeling of high-level cognition and
brain function’, Human Brain Mapping, 8(2–3), pp.
128–136.
Laird, J. E. (2012) The Soar Cognitive Architecture, AISB
Quarterly. MIT Press. doi: http://mitpress.mit.edu/
catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=12784.
Laird, J. E., Newell, A. and Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987)
‘Soar: An architecture for general intelligence.’,
Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), pp. 1–64.
Lee, E. A. and Seshia, S. A. (2016) Introduction to
Embedded Systems, A Cyber-Physical Systems
Approach. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi:
10.1007/71006.
Long, L. N., Hanford, S. D., Janrathitikarn, O., Sinsley, G.
L. and Miller, J. a (2007) ‘A Review of Intelligent
Systems Software for Autonomous Vehicles’, 2007
IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in
IVAPP 2018 - International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications
210