![](bg8.png)
Brewster, C., Alani, H., Dasmahapatra, S. and Wilks, Y.,
2004. Data Driven Ontology Evaluation. In 4th
International Conference on Language Resources and
Evaluation, LREC’04. Lisbon, Portugal, p. 4.
Buitelaar, P., Eigner, T. and Declerck, T., 2004.
OntoSelect: A dynamic ontology library with support
for ontology selection. In Proceedings of the Demo
Session at the International Semantic Web
Conference.
Burton-Jones, A., Storey, V.C., Sugumaran, V. and
Ahluwalia, P., 2005. A semiotic metrics suite for
assessing the quality of ontologies. Data & Knowledge
Engineering, 55(1), pp. 84-102.
Butt, A.S., Haller, A. and Xie, L., 2014, October.
Ontology search: An empirical evaluation. In
International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 130-147.
d'Aquin, M., Sabou, M., Motta, E., Angeletou, S.,
Gridinoc, L., Lopez, V. and Zablith, F., 2008. What
can be done with the Semantic Web? An Overview of
Watson-based Applications. In CEUR Workshop
Proceedings, 426.
Ding, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Pan, R., Cost, R.S., Peng, Y.,
Reddivari, P., Doshi, V. and Sachs, J., 2004,
November. Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for
the semantic web. In Proceedings of the thirteenth
ACM international conference on Information and
knowledge management, pp. 652-659.
Fahad, M. and Qadir, M.A., 2008. A Framework for
Ontology Evaluation. ICCS Supplement, 354, pp.149-
158.
Fernández, M., Cantador, I. and Castells, P., 2006. CORE:
A tool for collaborative ontology reuse and evaluation.
Fernández, M., Overbeeke, C., Sabou, M. and Motta, E.,
2009, December. What makes a good ontology? A
case-study in fine-grained knowledge reuse. In Asian
Semantic Web Conference, Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, pp. 61-75.
Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M. and Lehmann,
J., 2006, June. Modelling ontology evaluation and
validation. In European Semantic Web Conference,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 140-154.
Gill, T., 2008. Metadata and the Web. Introduction to
metadata, 3, pp.20-38.
Gómez-Pérez, A., 1995, February. Some ideas and
examples to evaluate ontologies. In Artificial
Intelligence for Applications, 1995. Proceedings., 11th
Conference on, IEEE, pp. 299-305.
Hartmann, J., Sure, Y., Haase, P., Palma, R. and Suarez-
Figueroa, M., 2005, November. OMV–ontology
metadata vocabulary. In ISWC, 3729.
Hlomani, H. and Stacey, D., 2014. Approaches, methods,
metrics, measures, and subjectivity in ontology
evaluation: A survey. Semantic Web Journal, 1(5),
pp.1-11.
Lewen, H. and d’Aquin, M., 2010, October. Extending
open rating systems for ontology ranking and reuse.
In International Conference on Knowledge
Engineering and Knowledge Management, Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 441-450.
Lewen, H., Supekar, K., Noy, N.F. and Musen, M.A.,
2006, May. Topic-specific trust and open rating
systems: An approach for ontology evaluation.
In Workshop on Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web.
Lozano-Tello, A. and Gómez-Pérez, A., 2004. Ontometric:
A method to choose the appropriate ontology. Journal
of Database Management (JDM), 15(2), pp.1-18.
Maedche, A. and Staab, S., 2002, October. Measuring
similarity between ontologies. In International
Conference on Knowledge Engineering and
Knowledge Management, Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, pp. 251-263.
Maiga, G. and Ddembe, W., 2008. Flexible approach for
user evaluation of biomedical ontologies.
Martínez-Romero, M., Jonquet, C., O’connor, M.J.,
Graybeal, J., Pazos, A. and Musen, M.A., 2017.
NCBO Ontology Recommender 2.0: an enhanced
approach for biomedical ontology
recommendation. Journal of biomedical
semantics, 8(1), p.21.
Martínez-Romero, M., Vázquez-Naya, J.M., Pereira, J.
and Pazos, A., 2014. BiOSS: A system for biomedical
ontology selection. Computer methods and programs
in biomedicine, 114(1), pp.125-140.
Matentzoglu, N., Malone, J., Mungall, C. and Stevens, R.,
2018. MIRO: guidelines for minimum information for
the reporting of an ontology. Journal of biomedical
semantics, 9(1), p.6.
McDaniel, M., Storey, V.C. and Sugumaran, V., 2016,
June. The role of community acceptance in assessing
ontology quality. In International Conference on
Applications of Natural Language to Information
Systems, Springer, Cham, pp. 24-36.
Morse, J.M., 2016. Mixed method design: Principles and
procedures. Routledge.
Netzer, Y., Gabay, D., Adler, M., Goldberg, Y. and
Elhadad, M., 2009. Ontology evaluation through text
classification. In Advances in Web and Network
Technologies, and Information, Management Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 210-221.
Obrst, L., Ceusters, W., Mani, I., Ray, S. and Smith, B.,
2007. The evaluation of ontologies. In Semantic web,
Springer, Boston, MA., pp. 139-158.
Sabou, M., Lopez, V., Motta, E. and Uren, V., 2006.
Ontology selection: Ontology evaluation on the real
semantic web.
Simperl, E., 2009. Reusing ontologies on the Semantic
Web: A feasibility study. Data & Knowledge
Engineering, 68(10), pp.905-925.
Sowa, J.F., 2000, August. Ontology, metadata, and
semiotics. In International Conference on Conceptual
Structures, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 55-81.
Supekar, K., 2005, July. A peer-review approach for
ontology evaluation. In 8th Int. Protege Conf, pp. 77-
79.
Supekar, K., Patel, C. and Lee, Y., 2004, May.
Characterizing Quality of Knowledge on Semantic
Web. In FLAIRS Conference, pp. 472-478.
Talebpour, M., Sykora, M. and Jackson, T. W. (2017)
‘The Role of Community and Social Metrics in
Ontology Selection for Reuse: Will It Ever Get Easier?
115