vocabulary such as collocation, connotation and
words registered; and grammar which is the accuracy
of the use of language orally and written effectively
in both the time of education and in the context of
work (Basturkmen, 2010).
The development of materials independently
intended to produce the quality and effective teaching
materials in increasing students understanding. In
fact, the development of teaching materials is the
selection process, adaptation and creation of teaching
materials based on specific benchmark. Hamalik
(2003) explained that some of the principles that need
to be noted in the arrangement of teaching materials
or material learning including cover the principle of
relevance, consistency and adequacy.
In the development of teaching materials, various
principles put forward by the experts. According to
Widodo and Jasmadi (2008), teaching materials
must be adjusted with the followings; and expected to
change
prioritizing
learning itself. Teaching materials
should also be in accordance with the needs and
characters
of learning that is listed
clearly
the learning
aims itself. The last one is teaching material must
contain materials in detail, both for training and
learning activities as well as load evaluation as a tool
to measure the success of learning.
The same thing was expressed by Tomlinson
(2011) in the development of teaching materials and
its relevance in the achievement of second language:
teaching materials can provide the impact that
means, advancing the principles of ease to understand
by learners, can develop a sense of students’
confidence, relevant and useful for learners. Teaching
materials also should be able to generate curiosity of
learners, provide adequate information about the
topics being taught so that the learners become
ready to study. Further development of English
language teaching materials must show the actual use
of language, describes the attention of learning
through language symptoms, and gives the
opportunity for learners to use the target language.
When in the process of learning, teaching materials
should also be able to pay attention to the positive
effects of the lessons, accommodate differences in
learning style, different learners, provide time
attitude calm on the sidelines of the matter, and able
to maximize learning potential by improving
intellectual, aesthetics and emotional involvement.
On the other hand, teaching material cannot be too
controlling the way the exercise is delivered by
providing opportunity to the students to give
feedbacks.
Maley also reveals the principle of the
development of teaching materials which include: (1)
stimulate and develop students’ motivation, both
through the intrinsic interest in thematic and other
techniques used; (2) prepare students with an
authentic English; (3) offer students various
suitability of achievement level of the work done on
the same teaching materials; (4) allow teachers to
specifically separate and select teaching materials in
specific group; (5) make students responsible for
independent learning the best possible; (6) integrate
language skills; (7) advance category communicative
function without ignoring the grammatical problem;
& (8) teaching materials must have a mean (Maley
and Grellet, 1980).
Of all the principles of the development of
learning materials that have been expressed above are
all in synergy with the exposure of teaching materials
that accentuate academic knowledge with attention to
the social aspects of empties on applying language
integrated with communicative competence.
Elements of the context of learning, diversity of
matter, students’ characters, students’ attitude toward
materials and the impact of materials to the
achievement of the students is becoming an important
consideration in developing an appropriate teaching
material, in line and able to achieve the goal of
learning itself.
The concept of ‘communication competencies’
was introduced firstly by Hymes as a critic to
Chomsky. Hymes (1972) stated that Chomsky’s
language competencies more intended to individual
capacity in developing grammatical system
(linguistic competence) (Stern et al., 1983). Hymes
emphasized sociolinguistic competence as a
fundamental concept in teaching communicative
language. These both experts emerge a number of
communicative competence models. The models
have similar concept but have different development
in detail description of communicative competence.
Model of communicative competence refers to
Canale and Swain, Canale, Bachman and Palmer, van
Ek, Celce-Murcia, and Dornyei and Thurell. Celece-
Murcia, Dornyei and Thurell made a model which is
enclosing the previous models. Model of
communicative competence presented by Celce-
Murcia, Dornyei & Thurell (1995) is described as a
pyramid consisting of a cycle and is surrounded by
circles. The cycle in the pyramid covers discourse
competence, and three pyramids, that is sociocultural
competence, linguistic competence, and action
competence. The cycles rounded the pyramid are
strategy competencies, which have potential
inventory skills that are able for a competent speaker
strategically to negotiate the message and solve
matters or compensate the lacks of others
competencies. The frame shows that discourse
competency as the core.