students and the stakeholders. And the third, the
result of needs analysis was analysed and
interpreted to produce the concept of speaking
skills appropriate to the students.
This research was carried out at a vocational
school in Karawang called “S” vocational school.
This school has three majors, namely; Pharmacy,
Computer Network, and Office and Administration.
The focus of the research was done at Computer
Networking Students. This major has three learning
school years; the first, the second, and the third year.
Each has 120 learners. Therefore, the total number
is 360 learners. In this research, 120 third-year
students were taken to be the participants. Since the
research adopted a qulitative approach, the
questionnaire, interview, observation, and
documentation became the major tools of data
collection (Creswell, 1998).
There are 49 questions in the questionnaire; 9
items for respondents’ profile, 15 items about the
English course, 5 items for target situation analysis,
8 items for the present situation analysis, 10 items
for the learning needs analysis, and 2 items for the
deficiency analysis, situation analysis (learning
needs analysis and deficiency).
There are three forms of interview guides, for the
students, instructors, course and other stakeholders
(the headmaster and foundation). The parts of
interview guide for the students are: small talk
(warm up), level check, probe, and wind-down
(closing). These stages are done to 20 students in
order to confirm the results of assessment from the
instructors. The main parts of the interview guide for
the instructors of the course are: introduction, time
and place, questions (students’ profile, importance
of the English course, students’ proficiency,
teaching and learning activities, course objective,
needs analysis, course preparation, evaluation,
facilitating factors, and suggestions) and closing.
The parts of interview guide for head master and
foundation board are similar to the instructor guides.
But the interview for the head master and foundation
was focused on the general purposes of the
institutions.
The observation is carried out for two English
teachers and students. The writer observed the
classroom activities once for each instructors. The
classroom took 90 minutes. The procedures of the
observations are as follows: first, the researcher
asked for permission and made an appointment to
both instructors to have observation in the
classroom. At the schedule time, the researcher and
the instructor came into the classroom together. In
the classroom, the researcher also set a video camera
to record the activities in that classroom. And he
tried to be invisible to the instructor and students.
During the observation, the researcher took notes of
the classroom implementation.
The field notes in this study are in narrative
forms. The researcher focused on the description of
classroom activities, which consisted of the type of
activity, the participant organization, the content, the
student modality, materials, and physical setting.
The document collected in this research includes
syllabus, lesson plans, instructional, test and students
test records documents. The documents were from
the instructors of the English course at school “S”.
To answer the first research question and the
second research question, the researcher categorized
the data in terms of such as the present students
speaking skill, institutional goals, classroom
implementation, materials, instructors, teaching
methodology, and evaluation. The questionnaire data
on English course, the interview data, the classroom
observation data, and the data from documents were
the sources that gave the present students speaking
skills and the portrait of the present course
implementation. The result of the data analysis and
the interpretation was used to be the basis to build
the concept training of speaking skill at vocational
school.
4 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 The Students’ Speaking Skills
Based on the interview conducted to 20 students in
English and the information from the instructor, the
researcher found low their speaking skill at the
school “S”. When the researcher began to interview
using English, most of students could understand,
but they still committed some errors in both
pronunciation and grammar. Furthermore, when the
interview moved to the level check and probe, most
of them did not understand what the researcher said.
This portrait described that level of the students
speaking skill was still under the average.
4.1.1 Target Situation Analysis
There are five items in target situation analysis,
which describes the students’ reasons to study
English for the future, their perception of the
importance of English and oral accuracy, the
frequency of their writing task, and their
intermediate future need. Generally, the students