An Early Warning Model of Financial Distress
Sharia Banks in Indonesia
Fadhil Yamaly, Sulastri, Syamsurijal AK, Isnurhadi
Business & Economics Faculty, University of Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
Keywords: Early Warning, Financial Distress, Discriminant Analysis, Islamic or Sharia banks
Abstract: Predictive models of financial distress presented by highly qualified researchers have identified
conclusively as an early warning of financial distress. This study aims to develop a model of an early
warning before the onset of financial distress in the group of Islamic or Sharia banks in Indonesia. Approach
to the development of models using multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) on panel data of 11 companies
studied Islamic banks in the period 2013-2017. The results showed that the financial variable flow cycle
(FFC), Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) and Debt to Equity could be a differentiator. The discriminant model
can predict cases accurately at 81,8%. The study's findings provide empirical support to the stakeholder in
the identification of the financial distress in Sharia banks.
1 INTRODUCTION
Since the collapse of Arthur Andersen, Enron,
WorldCom, Lehman Brothers, American Airlines
and Kodak, the global economy is becoming
increasingly sensitive to signs of financial distress,
bankruptcy and bankruptcy of the company,
(Cunningham and Harris, 2006; Adnan and
Humayon 2006; Stinson, 2010; Muller, Steyn and
Hamman, 2012). So is various problems arise in the
process of growth and sustainability of financial
institutions in various countries. For example, the
collapse of financial institutions such as Ihlas
Finance in Turkey and Bank Taqwa in the Bahamas,
as well as aid the prevention of bankruptcy (bail-
in/bail-out) on banks as happened in Fortis Bank
Belgium, Commerzbank Germany, Dubai Islamic
Bank and Al-Rajhi Bank of Saudi Arabia, could
threaten the economic system as a whole (Iqbal,
2001; Ali, 2007; Hasan, 2010; Haron, 2012; Husna
and Rahman, 2012). Similarly, in Indonesia, in 2015,
showed that Bank Muamalat Indonesia is also
experiencing financial distress. On the other hand,
Sharia banks in Indonesia has proliferated with an
average growth of 5 percent per year (FSA, 2017). It
is essential fatherly reviewing financial distress in
Sharia banking in Indonesia.
Definition, classification and predictive
modeling of financial distress and bankruptcy of the
company is an exciting research topic (Ward, 1997;
Trussell, 2002; Kpodoh 2009; Senbet and Wang,
2012). Financial distress is the inability of the
company to pay its obligations, the case before the
company becomes insolvent or fails (Fitzpatrick,
1932; Beaver, 1966; Altman, 1968; Altman et al.
1977; Ohlson, 1980). While others, financial distress
is defined as the process of financial loss phase
(Hofer, 1980; Whitaker, 1999; Platt and Platt, 2002
in Atmini 2005). However, some researchers suggest
that financial difficulties are when a company fails
to pay its obligations ((Latinen, 1994; Ward and
Foster, 1997; Whitaker, 1999; Cybinski, 2001;
Kuruppu, 2003; Steyn-Bruwer and Hamman, 2006;
Arena, 2008). It becomes a real difference, to make a
distinction between companies that fail classification
(fraud) or non-fail. Differences due to the
determination of variable definition and analysis.
Some researchers suggest studying financial distress,
it is not a failure, because of the narrow definition of
failure (Keasey and Watson, 1991; Kahya and
Theodossiou, 1996; McLeay and Omar, 2000; Platt
and Platt, 2002). On the other hand, the importance
of developing specific technical models and different
analysis to financial distress. (Keasey and Watson,
1991; Hayden, 2003; Taffler and Agarwal, 2007,
Fitzpatrick and Ogden, 2011, Zhiyong Li et al.
2017). Because of the narrow definition of failure
(Keasey and Watson, 1991; Kahya and Theodossiou,
1996; McLeay and Omar, 2000; Platt and Platt,
Yamaly, F., Sulastri, ., Kadir, S. and Isnurhadi, .
An Early Warning Model of Financial Distress Sharia Banks in Indonesia.
DOI: 10.5220/0008444507230732
In Proceedings of the 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference (SEABC 2018), pages 723-732
ISBN: 978-989-758-387-2
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
723
2002). On the other hand, the importance of
developing specific technical models and different
analysis to financial distress. (Keasey and Watson,
1991; Hayden, 2003; Taffler and Agarwal, 2007,
Fitzpatrick and Ogden, 2011, Zhiyong Li et al.
2017). Because of the narrow definition of failure
(Keasey and Watson, 1991; Kahya and Theodossiou,
1996; McLeay and Omar, 2000; Platt and Platt,
2002). On the other hand, the importance of
developing specific technical models and different
analysis to financial distress. (Keasey and Watson,
1991; Hayden, 2003; Taffler and Agarwal, 2007,
Fitzpatrick and Ogden, 2011, Zhiyong Li et al.
2017).
This study will develop models and techniques
of financial analysis with consideration to determine
a good prediction related to the financial condition
and performance prediction. The financial analysis
involves static financial ratios have been widely
used in predicting the company's financial distress
and bankruptcy (Damodaran, 2001; Alkhatib and
Bzour 2011; Burksitiene and Mazintiene, 2011).
Over time, the static model of financial analysis is
less able to predict the financial distress in the
changing economic environment and changes in its
operations effectively and continuously (Sun and Li,
2011). On the one hand, some researchers argue
dynamic working capital can participate in providing
a simple methodology with the purpose of
evaluating financial performance (Flueriet 1980;
Kehdy and Blanc 2003; Costa and Gracias, 2009;
Fleuriet and Zeidan 2015). Along with this, working
capital can reflect the financial health of the
company related to profitability and liquidity
(Sagner 2014 Talonpoika, 2016). The use of total
debt in the funding of companies (financial leverage)
risk within the period, the volatility of the fund and
asset value growth, with leverage dynamic
measurement also able to generalize the risk of
failure of the company (Smirnov, 2004;
Xiadongzhang and Jonghe 2015; Marzo and Zhiguo,
2016).
The study was oriented management of Islamic
finance, especially in Islamic banking in Indonesia.
Islamic banking or Sharia banking (Al-Mashrafiyah
al-Islamiya) has a banking system operating with
Islamic principles. Assumed to have partial
resistance and health adequate (Saeed, 1996;
Rammal, 2007; Jaizah and Mehmet 2017). Even so,
some Sharia banks in Indonesia have indications of
financial distress. Below in Table 1 are presented the
phenomenon of Sharia banking, which processed
with priority dimensions of income (EBIT) of debt
relationships with the company's assets.
Table 1: Dimensions phenomenon Earning Before Income Tax (EBIT), Debt to Asset Ratio (DAR) of Sharia Banking in
Indonesia in 2012-2016
No.
EBIT TO DAR
2012
2013
2014
2016
1
Bank Aceh Syariah
BASS
-
-
-
117,363
2
Bank Muamalat Indonesia
BMI
552,095
709,266
105,693
124,537
3
Bank Victoria Syariah
BVS
12,409
5,589
(28,717)
(31,671)
4
Bank BRI Syariah
BRIS
149,382
203,834
16,795
262,397
5
Bank Jabar Banten Syariah
BJBS
24,859
46,833
39,695
(618,860)
6
Bank BNI Syariah
BNIS
155,034
197,099
244,603
409,127
7
Bank Syariah Mandiri
BSM
1,188,779
956,543
118,535
473,065
8
Bank Mega Syariah
BMS
286,501
218,154
26,255
182,630
9
Bank Panin Dubai Syariah
BPD
60,705
33,511
115,733
32,106
10
Bank Syariah Bukopin
BSB
28,687
31,488
13,909
53,973
11
Bank BCA Syariah
BCAS
13,532
19,802
22,123
63,130
12
Bank Maybank Syariah Indonesia
BMSI
104,244
104,095
133,951
(292,558)
13
Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional
Syariah
BTPNS
-
-
173,210
71, 202
Source: compiled from various sources for research purposes
Table 1 shows during the five years from 2012 to
2016, Sharia banking in Indonesia is experiencing
the dynamics and dimensions fluctuations EBIT of
DAR. Also, in 2014, several Sharia banks
experienced a decline in profitability. Sharia banking
development is also experiencing difficulties in
profitability, working capital and debt (Hasan, 2010;
Hassairi 2011; Husna and Rahman, 2012; Pappas
and Izzeldin 2012; Jaizah, 2013).
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
724
This study will be different from previous
research that has done. As a comparison, it can serve
on the differentiation of the prediction model of
financial distress in the banking industry are
presented in Table 2. From Table 2, the apparent
disparity research, financial distress prediction
studies on Sharia banking is still minimal. Besides,
dynamic models in the prediction of financial
distress have begun to be used since 2012. The
current study aims to develop a new model of early
warning of financial distress in Sharia banks in
Indonesia, taking into account the dynamic and
leverage the working capital of the company.
Table 2: Differentiation Prediction Model for Financial Distress and Bankruptcy in Banking Industry
empirical era
Model Related features
Object of
research
1970
Using MDA multivariate discriminant analysis (Altman 1968; Meyer and Pifer,
1970; Sinkey, 1975; Sinkey, 1977), logit regression (Martin, 1977)
conventional
banking
1980
Using Logit and Probit models, the ratio of CAMEL (Bovenzi, 1983; West,
1985; Zavgren, 1985; Whalen and Thomson, 1988; Looney et al. 1989), Factor
Analysis (West, 1985).
conventional
banking
1990
Using a logit model, Neural Network, CAMELS ratio, macroeconomic approach
and professional assessment (Espahbodi, 1991; Thomson, 1992; Tam and Kiang
1992; Henage, 1995; Tan, 1996; Hermosillo, 1996; Bell 1997; Swicegood,
1998), Methods AEIS and neural networks (neural network) (Tam and Kiang,
1990; Tam, 1991; Swicegood and Clark, 2000).
conventional
banking
2000
During the 2000s, began to develop an early warning system (system EWS
warning) Using logit analysis of parametric and non-parametric, Genetic Neural
Network, MDA, Probit, research areas in the United States (Kolari, 2002; Tung,
2004, Canbas, 2005; Lanine and Vennet, 2006), the territory of Japan, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Turkey, Norway, Britain, Austria and Russia (Kutznetsov 2003,
Logan, 2003; Golovan, 2003; Hayden and Baeur 2004; Montgomery, 2005;
Lanine and Vennet 2006 ; Konstandina 2006; Halling and Hayden, 2006;
Andersen 2008; Bakir and Tahir 2009; Boyacioglu, 2009). The dynamic model
of financial distress in Banking (Kahl, 2002; Cole and Qionghy, 2009).
Conventional
banking, (starting
inferred from the
dynamic model)
2010 -2017
In addition to conventional banking, Islamic or Sharia banking, began to also
develop a model of financial distress (financial distress) in various countries,
(Hasan, 2010; Hassairi 2011; Zaabi, 2011; Husna and Rahman, 2012; Pappas
and Izzeldin 2012; Jaizah, 2013, Baklaci and Baydoan 2014; Nawaz, 2017; Laila
and Widihadnanto, 2017).
Some dynamic model predictions of financial distress in conventional banking
(Achsani, Nuryatono and Haymens 2010; Zhiyong, Crook and Andreeva, 2016).
Conventional and
Sharia (Islamic)
banking
Source: compiled from various sources for research purposes
This research is expected to explain the gap
between researchers on the issue of working capital
as a variable dynamic early warning of financial
distress so it can be used for the achievement of the
sustainability performance of Sharia banking.
Subsequently, in the next section, conducted a
literature review with the support of theories have
been developed previously. Moreover, it will focus
on the development of early warning models of
financial distress. Next, it presented a description of
the findings, discussion, and conclusion.
2 LITERATURE
Decisions on finance companies can be grouped
into three critical decisions: (1) a decision on the
investment (the investment decision): related to the
choice between investment potential and right, (2)
the funding decision: relates to collecting / obtain
funds for investment that create value and choice
mix money owners (equity) or borrowed money
(debt) must use the company. (3) The decision of
dividend: related to the number of funds to be
reinvested in the funding of business activities and
how much should be returned to the owner
An Early Warning Model of Financial Distress Sharia Banks in Indonesia
725
(Damodaran, 2004; Copeland, Weston and Shastri,
2005).
Funding decisions relating to the selection of the
company's financial resources. As a result, along
with the debt increases, the likelihood of financial
distress or even bankruptcy will increase with the
risk of bankruptcy is higher, the debt holders will
demand payment of the promised higher, which also
will increase the cost of pre-tax debt (Brigham and
Daves, 2007). The increase in debt (leverage) will
increase the likelihood of financial distress and
bankruptcy (Jensen and Smith, 1984). The trade-off
theory assumes the company will have a capital
structure that is optimal based on the balance (trade-
off) between the benefits to the cost of the use of
debt (Peirson, 2006). In turn, financial distress will
lead to a reduction in the company (firm value).
The initial literature, a relationship between
financial distress and bankruptcy on the company's
capital structure proposed by Modigliani and Miller
(1958, 1963), known as the capital-MM Structure
Theory. It also assumes that bankruptcy does not
cause economic hardship. There is confusion about a
pair of related but different concepts: financial
distress and economic hardship. Financial distress
means that the company promises to creditors
damaged (Haugen and Senbet 1978, Gertner and
Scharfstein 1991). This is directly related to utilizing
the company's decision. Furthermore, in the Pecking
Order Theory (Myers, 1984) states that there is a
sequence (hierarchy) for companies in the use of
capital. Companies prefer to use internal funding
sources, then with debt, and the latter with equity
funding. Debt as a source of funding that comes
from outside the company while in the company.
This debt, in turn, must be repaid. Besides that, in
the structure of the financial statements, the Sharia
banking is known that has not bound investment.
Which is the separation of the elements of the debt
or capital (Husna and Rahman, 2012).
This study develops a study on the management
of working capital finance (Fleuriet et al. 1978), as
part of a dynamic model of working capital. This
model divides the current assets and current
liabilities into financial and operational cycles are
flexible between assets and liabilities. Finance
working capital management is one of the
possibilities to get the dynamic flexibility of the
financial performance and optimize profitability,
with a focus on asset flexibility, cash flow and debt
management (Marttonen et al. 2013; Talonpoika,
2016). In this case, the approach of the cycle time to
be the size of financial working capital and liquidity,
showing how the company can operate with liquid
assets after closing the current liabilities and is
known as the cycle of financial flows or FFC
(Talonpoika, 2016).
On the other hand, the increase in working
capital funding will affect the operational working
capital, so that the performance measures in the form
of cash conversion cycle (CCC) is used to measure
the operational working capital (Knauer and
Wohrmann, 2013; Talonpoika 2016). FFC
performance measures are only able to be enhanced
by financial items and then shifted to the operational
steps. Thus, the FFC measurement should be used in
conjunction with the CCC, to produce an accurate
decision. Additionally, some researchers estimate the
company's financial distress, uses dynamic
prediction models with various approaches
(Fitzpatrick and Ogden, 2011; Konstantaras and
Siriopoulos, 2011; Kim and Partington, 2014;
Zhiyong, Crook and Andreeva, 2017).
3 RESEARCH METHODS
In many studies, a large number of ratios have
been used in predicting financial distress. The ratio
is dominant, with the main criteria: working capital,
profitability, liquidity, solvency generally better in
predicting potential and financial distress (Bhunia
and Sarkar, 2011; Fitzpatrick and Ogden, 2011,
Zhiyong Li et al. 2017). In this study the selected
ratio is as follows:
Financial flows Cycle (FFC): shows the gap of
time and value, operational between current assets
and current liabilities of operations, related to
finance working capital cycle. FFC consists of two
components: other current assets (Other Current
Assets) and other current liabilities (Current
Liabilities) (Flueriet, 1980; Silva, 2010; Rehn 2012;
Camargos and Leao in 2014; Talonpoika, 2016).
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC): is a variant of
the cycle time inventory and accounts receivable
cycle with the cycle of debt. It is intended to test the
limits of financial and operational working capital.
Operating working capital includes three
components: inventory accounts receivable and
payable (Flueriet, 1980; Camargos and Leao in
2014; Talonpoika, 2016).
Debt to Equity Ratio (DER): indicates the
relative proportion or the extent to which companies
take on debt as a means to increase its value. More
debt used by the company about total assets, the
higher the risk can not meet debt payments are
contractual (Souza and Smirnov, 2012; Sagner 2014
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
726
Xiadongzhang and Jonghe 2015; Marzo and Zhiguo,
2016; Saračević and Šarlija, 2017).
Debt to Assets Ratio (DAR): the extent to which
the company's ability to meet the total liabilities, the
capital structure which compares the size of debt
with asset management. Can also be used to measure
how much of the company's assets are financed by
debt. The higher the ratio, the higher the degree of
leverage and cause financial risks (Souza and
Smirnov, 2012; Sagner 2014; Xiadongzhang and
Jonghe, 2015; Marzo and Zhiguo, 2016; Saračević
and Šarlija, 2017).
Debt to EBITDA: shows the company's ability to
meet the total liabilities, the capital structure which
compares the size of the debt to EBITDA, ignore the
factor of interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization. The ratio of Debt / EBITDA are high
indicates that the company may not be able to
service the debt properly and ensure that the credit
ratings downgraded(Souza and Smirnov, 2012;
Sagner 2014; Xiadongzhang and Jonghe, 2015;
Marzo and Zhiguo, 2016; Saračević and Šarlija,
2017).
Samples of data derived from the financial
statements for five (5) years from 2013 to 2017. The
unit of analysis in this research is the Indonesian
Sharia banks, which is a company engaged in the
financial industry sector, as a Sharia commercial
bank. Data Sharia banks experiencing financial
distress is taken from the measurement approach the
level of performance and classified into 2 (two)
groups: low performance and high-performance
group. Performance is measured by ratings and an
average score of four financial ratios: profitability,
productivity, efficiency, and leverage. (Osaimy,
2004; Jaizah, 2013). Analyzes were performed with
Multiple discriminant analysis (MDA). MDA is a
statistical method that allows for the study of more
than two variables simultaneously and used to
understand the structure of high dimensional data
(Bryman and Cramer, 2005). Use of Multiple
discriminant analysis (MDA) has been widely
applied in research management and accounting
(Altman 1968, 1993, 2005; Syahida and Ameer
2010, Bhunia, 2011). As a multivariate technique,
Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA) has a
prevailing assumption in the multiple regression
analysis and perform well if the variable in the group
follow a normal distribution (Bhunia and Sarkar,
2011). Data analysis technique in this research is to
analyze the variable ratio in the company's financial
statements and processing discriminant analysis. The
processing stage of discriminant analysis consists of:
estimating the coefficients of the discriminant
function with stepwise, test the similarity of the
average group, significant test between the two
groups, test the accuracy of the model, determine the
functional equation and validation determine the cut-
off point.
4 FINDINGS
After identifying the research methodology, this
section presents the empirical findings by the
particular method used.
Test Similarity Average Group: this test uses two
methods; namely, Wilks 'lambda and significant
value to the F test value of Wilks' lambda close to 0
indicate increasingly significant. Here in Table 3 are
presented the results of median equality test groups
and test for normality
Table 3: Tests of Equality of Group Means & Normality
Wilks' Lambda
F
DF1
DF2
Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
statistical
Df
Sig.
FFC
, 730
19.592
1
53
, 000
, 099
55
, 200 *
DebttoAsset
, 934
3.716
1
53
, 059
, 072
55
, 200 *
trans_CCC
, 794
13.726
1
53
.001
, 087
55
, 200 *
trans_DebtoEqu
, 880
7.217
1
53
.010
, 099
55
, 200 *
trans_DebttoEbitda
, 971
1,607
1
53
, 210
, 114
55
, 070
Source: (Data from SPSS, 2018)
Based on Table 3, the variables that can
distinguish between healthy and unhealthy groups
namely FFC, trans_CCC and trans_ DebttoEqu
because it has significant value <0.05 and has a
value of 0. The test results wilks'lamda approaching
normality Kolmogorov-Smirnova showed that the
independent variable distribution normal.
An Early Warning Model of Financial Distress Sharia Banks in Indonesia
727
Significant Test Between Two Variables: this test uses stepwise method to find the best variables.
Table 4: Significant Test (Variable Entered / Removeda, b, c, d)
Step
Entered
Min. D Squared
Statistics
Between
Groups
Exact F
statistics
DF1
DF2
Sig.
1
FFC
1,539
0 and 1
19.592
1
53,000
4,815E-005
2
trans_CCC
2,170
0 and 1
13.547
2
52,000
1,839E-005
3
trans_DebtoEqu
2.746
0 and 1
11.211
3
51,000
9,216E-006
Source: (Data from SPSS, 2018)
In Table 4 independent variables that satisfy the
requirements to enter the discriminant equation is
FFC, trans_CCC, and trans_DebttoEqu that have
significant value <0.05.
Accuracy Test of Discriminant: This test measured
using wilks'lamda.
Table 5: Wilks' Lambda
Test of Function (s)
Wilks' Lambda
Chi-square
Df
Sig.
1
, 603
26.084
3
, 000
Source: (Data from SPSS, 2018)
Wilks'lamda value of 0.603 and 0.000 significant
value, which means there are significant differences
between healthy and unhealthy groups on the
discriminant model.
Discriminant function analysis: discriminant
function so formed can be seen in Table of
Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients.
Table 6: Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients
Function
1
FFC
.001
trans_CCC
, 037
trans_DebtoEqu
-1.170
(Constant)
-2.191
Source: (Data from SPSS, 2018)
Discriminant function which is formed by a table
of 6, namely:
Z = -2.191 + 0.001FFC + 0.037 trans_CCC
1.170 trans_DebttoEqu
Cut-Off Point: used to group company based on
the value obtained. The following table is used to
determine the cut-off point.
Table 7: Functions at Group centroids
Dependen0_1
(Y)
Function
1
Healthy
-1.055
Not healthy
, 603
Source: (Data from SPSS, 2018)
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
728
According to the table above, Sharia banks are
healthy have an average score: -1.055. Sharia banks
do not have an average score of 0.603. Cut off score
= (-1.055 + 0.603) / 2 = -0.226. Thus, if the value of
Z score <-0.226 classified as Sharia banks are
healthy and if the value of Z score> -0.226 classified
as Sharia banks are not healthy.
Hit ratio: is one of the criteria for assessing the
strength of the sensitivity of the discriminant
equation in classifying objects. From Table 8 below,
the discriminant function can predict accurately the
case of 81.8%.
Table 8: Classification Results
a,c
Dependen0_1
Predicted Group
Membership
Total
0
1
Original
Count
Healthy
20
0
20
Not healthy
10
25
35
ungrouped cases
0
1
1
%
Healthy
100.0
, 0
100.0
Not healthy
28.6
71.4
100.0
ungrouped cases
, 0
100.0
100.0
Cross-validatedb
Count
Healthy
19
1
20
Not healthy
11
24
35
%
Healthy
95.0
5.0
100.0
Not healthy
31.4
68.6
100.0
a. 81.8% of original grouped cases Correctly classified.
b. Cross validation is done only for Reviews those cases in the analysis. In cross validation, each case is classified by
the functions derived from all cases other than that case.
c. 78.2% of cross-validated grouped cases Correctly classified.
5 CONCLUSIONS AND
IMPLICATIONS
Based on the results of the discriminant analysis,
financial ratios that proved significant for Sharia
banks differentiate healthy and unhealthy in
Indonesia in 2013-2017, namely the Financial Flow
Cycle (FFC), conversion Cash Cycle (CCC) and
Debt to Equity. Discriminant function equations
were formed, namely Z = -2.191 + 0.001FFC +
0.037trans_CCC1.170 trans_ DebttoEqu and
cut-off point that is formed is -0.226. CCC
has the highest coefficient in the formation of the
discriminant.
The results of the discriminant analysis, Sharia
banks are considered as healthy, if the value of FFC
and CCC is getting smaller or negative, so it will
minimize the value of the discriminant function.
Likewise, with the DebttoEqu coefficient being
negative, if the DebttoEqu value is greater, it will
reduce the value of the discriminant function.
Furthermore, Sharia banks are considered as
unhealthy, if the value of FFC and CCC is getting
bigger, so it will enlarge the value of the
discriminant function. Likewise, with a negative
DebttoEqu coefficient, if the DebttoEqu value gets
smaller, it will increase the value of the discriminant
function
Finally, this model can be used by government
regulators to monitor the performance of Sharia
banks are likely to experience financial problems.
On the one hand, from the standpoint of the
regulator, the ability to detect early performance of
Sharia banking using publicly available data will
have a significant impact on the cost of monitoring
and inspection. Given that the authentic character of
Sharia banks, which provide durability and
uniqueness partially operational, it is essential to
further develop the financial distress early warning
mechanisms to proactively by considering new
variables associated with the uniqueness of Sharia
banks.
An Early Warning Model of Financial Distress Sharia Banks in Indonesia
729
REFERENCES
Agarwal, V. & Taffler, R. J. (2007), Twenty-five Years of
the Taffler Z-score model: Does it Really Have
Predictive Ability?, Accounting & Business Research,
37(4), pp. 285-300.
Alan Bryman and Duncan Cramer (2005), Quantitative
Data Analysis with SPSS 12 and 13, This edition
published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, ISBN 0-
203-49818-6 Master e-book ISBN
Alkhatib, K. & Al Bzour, A. E. (2011), Predicting
Corporate Bankruptcy of Jordanian Listed Companies:
Using Altman and Kida Models, International Journal
of Business and Management, 6(3):208215.
Al-Osaimy, M. H. & Bamakhramah, A. S. (2004), An
Early Warning System for Islamic Banks Performance,
Islamic Economics, 17(1), 3-14.
Altman E.I (2006), Corporate financial distress and
bankruptcy: predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and
invest in distressed debt, Edith Hotchkiss. 3rd-ed.
Altman, E. I. (1968), Financial ratios, discriminant
analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy,
Journal of Finance, 23, 589609.
Altman, E.I (1993), Corporate Financial Distress and
Bankruptcy, 2nd end, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
NY.
Anna-Maria Talonpoika Timo Kärri Miia Pirttilä Sari
Monto, (2016), Defined strategies for financial
working capital management, International Journal of
Managerial Finance, Vol. 12 Iss 3 pp. 277 294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-11-2014-0178
Anna-Maria Talonpoika, (2016), Financial Working
Capital - Management and Measurement, Ph.D. thesis,
Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 695 Diss.
Lappeenranta University of Technology, ISBN 978-
952-265-946-0, ISBN 978-952-265-947-7
Arena, M. (2008). Bank Failures and Bank Fundamentals:
A Comparative Analysis of Latin America and East
Asia During the Nineties Using Bank-level Data,
Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(2), 299-310.
Aswath Damodaran, (2004), Applied Corporate Finance,
Damodaran Online, 2nd Edition
Beaver, W. H. (1966), Financial Ratios as Predictors of
Failure, Journal of Accounting Research.
Bhunia Amalendu and Sarkar R (2011), A Study of
Financial Distress based on MDA, Journal of
Management Research, ISSN 1941-899X, Vol. 3, No.
2: E6
Burksaitiene, D., & Mazintiene, A. (2011), The Role of
Bankruptcy Forecasting in the Company Management,
Economics & Management, 16, 137143.
Charles W. Hofer, (1980) Turn Around Strategies, Journal
of Business Strategy, Vol. 1 Issue: 1, pp.19-31.
Clifford De Souza and Mikhail Smirnov, (2004), Dynamic
Leverage: A contingent claims approach to leverage
for capital conservation, The Journal of Portfolio
Management 25-39, SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
Costa F and Garcias P.M (2009), Market concentration and
performance of the Brazilian paper and pulp industries
- using Fleuriet's modeling to analyze the ECD
paradigm, Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, v.
3, n. 6, p. 143-163.
Cunningham, G. M., Harris. J. E. (2006), Enron and
Arthur Andersen: the case of the Crooked E and the
fallen, A. Global Perspectives on Accounting
Education, 3, pp. 27-48.
Cybinski, P. (2001), Description, Explanation, Prediction -
The Evolution of Bankruptcy Studies ?, Managerial
Finance, 27(4), 29-44.
Damodaran Aswath, (2004), Applied Corporate Finance,
Second Edition,
Erik Rehn (2012), Effect of Working Capital Management
on Company Profitability, An Industri-wise study of
Finnish and Swedish public companies, A thesis,
Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki
Eugene F. Brigham and Phillip R. Daves, (2007),
Intermediate Financial Management, Ninth Edition,
Thomson/South-Western, ISBN 0-324-31987-8
(book), ISBN 0-324-31986-X (package)
Fitzpatrick Julie & Ogden P. Joseph (2011), “The
Detection and Dynamics of Financial Distress”
International Review of Finance, DOI: 10.111/j.1468-
24443.2010.011119.x, pp.87-121
Fitzpatrick, F. (1932), A Comparison of Ratios of
Successful Industrial Enterprises with Those of Failed
Firm, Certified Public Accountant, 6, 727-731
Fleuriet M.A (1980), The Financial dynamics of the
companies, a new method of analysis, budget and
financial planning, 2ed., Belo Horizonte, Fundação
Dom Cabral,
Fleuriet, M and Zeidan R, (2015), O Modelo Dinâmico de
Gestão Financeira, Alta Books, Editora, Rio de
Janeiro, https:// www.researchgate.net
/publication/281295873
Fleuriet, M, Kehdy, R; Blanc, G, (2003), O Modelo
Fleuriet: a dinâmica financeira das empresas
brasileiras, Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Halling, M. & Hayden, E. (2006), Bank Failure
Prediction: A Two-Step Survival Time Approach,
SSRN eLibrary.
Hasan Zubair (2010), Dubai Financial Crisis; Causes,
Bailout and after a case study, Journal of MPRA,
INCEIF the Global University of Islamic Finance, KL
Hassairi A Slim and Rajhi Wassim (2012), Capital
Structure and Financial Risks in Non-Conventional
Banking System, International Journal of Economics
& Finance Vol.4, No. 4
Haugen, R. A., and Senbet, L. W. (1978), The
Insignificance of Bankruptcy Costs to The Theory of
Optimal Capital Structure, The Journal of Finance, 33:
383393
Hayden, E. (2003), Are Credit Scoring Models Sensitive
With Respect to Default Definitions? Evidence from
the Austrian Market, EFMA, Helsinki Meetings.
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/ abstract =407709
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
730
Iqbal Munawar (2001), Islamic and Conventional Banking
in the Nineties: A Comparative Study, Journal of
Islamic Economic Studies, Vol.8, No.2.
Jaizah Othman & Mehmet Asutay (2017), Integrated early
warning prediction model for Islamic: the Malaysian
case, J Bank Regul, DOI 10.1057/s41261-017-004005,
Macmillan Publisher Ltd
Jaizah Otman (2013), Analysing Financial Distress in
Malaysian Islamic Banks: Exploring Integrative
Predictive Methods, Durham theses, Durham
University.
James S Sagner, (2014), Working Capital Management
Application and Cases, John John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
ISBN 978-1-118-93383-1 (cloth); ISBN 978-1-118-
93384-8 (epub); 978-1-118-93385-5 (epdf).
Jonathan Berk, Peter DeMarzo, Jarrad Harford, (2012),
Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 2nd Edition,
Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0-13-214823-8
Kahya, E. & Theodossiou, P. (1996), Predicting Corporate
Financial Distress: A Time-Series CUSUM
Methodology, Review of Quantitative Finance &
Accounting, 13,71-93
Keasey, K. & Watson, R. (1991), The State of the Art of
Small Firm Failure Prediction: Achievements and
Prognosis, International Small Business Journal, 9(4),
11.
Kim, M. H. & Partington, G. (2014). Dynamic forecasts of
financial distress of Australian firms, Australian
Journal of Management, 40 (1), 135-160
Knauer, T & Wöhrmann, A. (2013), Working capital
management and firm profitability, Journal of
Management Control, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 77-87.
Konstantaras, Konstantinos and Siriopoulos, Costas,
(2011), Estimating financial distress with a dynamic
model: Evidence from family-owned enterprises in a
small open economy, Journal of Multinational
Financial Management, 21, issue 4, p. 239-255
Kpodoh, B. (2009), Bankruptcy and Financial Distress
Prediction in the Mobile Telecom Industry: The case of
MTN Ghana, Millicom Ghana and Ghana
Telecom, School of Management, Blekinge Institute of
Technology
Lemma W. Senbet dan Tracy Yue Wang (2012), Corporate
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy: A Survey,
Foundations, and Trends in Finance
M. Adnan Aziz, Humayon A. Dar, (2006), Predicting
corporate bankruptcy: where we stand?, Corporate
Governance: The international journal of business in
society, Vol. 6 Issue: 1, pp.18-33
Marcos Antônio de Camargos, Mirela Castro Santos
Camargos, Luciano de Castro Garcia Leão, (2014),
Empirically Testing The "Flueriet's Model": Evidence
of Bazilian Market, Journal of Business and
Management Review ISSN: 2047 0398
Marttonen-Arola, Salla, Viskari, Sari and Kärri, Timo
(2013), The missing link between maintenance
contracts and flexible asset management.
International, Journal of Procurement Management, 6
(6). pp. 649-665
McLeay, S. & Omar, A. (2000), The Sensitivity of
Prediction Models to the Non-Normality of Bounded
and Unbounded Financial Ratios, The British
Accounting Review, 32(2), 213-230.
Michael C. Jensen and Clifford W. Smith, Jr, (1984), The
Modern Theory of Corporate Finance, Editors, (New
York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1984) pp. 2-20.
Mikhail Smirnov, (2012), Dynamic Leverage as a
Generalization of Traditional Value- At-Risk Measures
and its Use in Portfolio Construction, Columbia
University, SSRN-id2173865
Miranda GJ and Silva Duarte, (2016), Indicators of
Working Capital Management before and after the
adoption of the IAS in Brazil, Journal of Education and
Research in Accounting, ISSN: 1981-8610
Modigliani, Franco, and Miller, Merton H., (1958), The
Cost of Capital, Corporate Finance, and the Theory of
Investment, the American Economic Review, 48/3, 261
297.
Modigliani, Franco, and Miller, Merton H., (1963), The
Cost of Capital, Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost
of Capital: A Correction, the American Economic
Review, 53/3, 433 443
Muller GH, Steyn-Bruwer B.W & Hamman W.D, (2012),
What is the best way to predict financial distress of
companies, An Article
Muller, G. H.; Steyn-Bruwer, B. W. & Hamman, W. D.
(2009), Predicting Financial Distress of Companies
Listed on the JSE - A Comparison of Techniques,
South African Journal of Business Management,
40(1), 21-32.
Myers, S., (1984), The Capital Structure Puzzle, Journal of
Finance, Vol. 39.
Ohlson, J. A. (1980), Financial Ratios and the
Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy, Journal of
Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, (2017), Indonesia Sharia
Financial Development Roadmap 2017-2019,
Financial Services Authority.
Oyelere, P., Kuruppu, N. & Laswad, F. (2003), The
Efficacy of Liquidation and Bankruptcy Prediction
Models for Assessing Going Concern, Managerial
Auditing Journal, 18(6/7),
Pappas Vasileios and Izzeldin Marwan (2011),
Determinants of Survival in Islamic Banks, Dept of
Economics, Lancaster University Management School.
Pappas Vasileios, Izzeldin Marwan and Fuertes Maria-Ana
(2012), Failure Risk in Islamic and Conventional,
Lancaster University Management School, UK.
Peirson, G. (2006), Business Finance, 9th Edition.
McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Limited.
Peter De Marzo and Zhiguo He, (2016), Leverage
Dynamics without Commitment, Stanford University,
Graduate School of Business, and NBER
Platt, H. D. & Platt, M. B. (2002), predicting Corporate
Financial Distress: Reflections on Choice-based
Sample Bias, Journal of Economics and Finance,
26(2), 184-199.
An Early Warning Model of Financial Distress Sharia Banks in Indonesia
731
Rahman Abdul R and Husna Nurul H (2012), Financial
Distress-Detection Model for Islamic Bank,
International Journal of Trade, Economics and
Finance, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 1-7
Rahman Abdul R and Masngut Y Mazni (2014), The Use
of “CAMELS” In Detecting Financial Distress of
Islamic Bank In Malaysia, The Journal of Applied
Business Research March/April 2014 Volume 30,
Number 2.
Rammal, H. G., Zurbruegg, R. (2007), Awareness of
Islamic Banking Products Among Muslims: The Case
of Australia, Journal of Financial Services Marketing,
12(1), 65-74.
Razali Haron, (2016), Do Indonesian firms practice target
capital structure? A dynamic approach, Journal of
Asia Business, Studies, Vol. 10 Iss 3 pp. -
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JABS-07-2015-0100
Rehn Erik, (2012), Effect of Working Capital Management
on Company Profitability, Helsinki
Richard B. Whitaker, (1999), The Early Stages of
Financial Distress, Journal of Economics and Finance,
Volume 23, Pages 123-I33
Ruth Bender and Keith Ward, (2009), Corporate Financial
Strategy, 3rd Edition, Elsevier Butterworth-
Heinemann, ISBN 978-0-7506-8665-5
Saeed, Abdullah. (1996), Islamic Banking and Interest: A
Study of the Prohibition of Riba and its Contemporary
Interpretation, Leiden, Netherlands: E.J.Brill.
Sagner S James, (2014), Working Capital Management,
Application, and Cases, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
Hoboken, New Jersey.
Salman Syed Ali (2007), Financial Distress and Bank
Failure: Lesson from Closure of Ihlas Finans in
Turkey, Journal of Islamic Economic Studies, Vol.14
No.1 & 2 pp. 1-52
Saračević N., Šarlija N, (2017), The Usefulness of
Financial Ratios in Discriminating Between Healthy
and Distressed Companies: The Case of an Islamic
Bank, In Efendić V., Hadžić F., Izhar H. (eds) Critical
Issues and Challenges in Islamic Economics and
Finance Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Silva, J. P. (2010), Financial analysis of companies,
10.ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Smirnov Mikhail and Souza De Clifford (2004), Dynamic
Leverage, Journal of Portfolio Management,
Stewart C. Myers, (1984), The Capital Structure Puzzle,
The Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, No. 3, Papers and
Proceedings, Forty-Second Annual Meeting, American
Finance Association, San Francisco, CA, December
28-30, pp. 575-592.
Stinson Todd, (2010), Arthur Anderson and Enron:
Positive Influence on the Accounting Industry,
https://www.mckendree.edu/academics/
scholars/issue4/stinson.htm
Sun, Jie & Li, Hui. (2011), Dynamic financial distress
prediction using instance selection for the disposal of
concept drift, Expert Syst. Appl. 38. 2566 -2576.
10.1016/ j.eswa.2010.08.046.
Syahida M.Z and R. Ameer, (2010), Turnaround
prediction of distressed companies: evidence from
Malaysia, Journal of Financial Reporting and
Accounting, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 143-159, Emerald
Group Publishing Limited 1985-2517, DOI: 10.1108/
1985 2511 011 088 398,
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/1985-2517.htm
T.E. Copeland, J.F. Weston, K. Shastri, (2005), Financial
Theory and Corporate Policy, 4th Edition, Pearson
Education Inc, ISBN: 0-321-12721-8
Triyuwono, Iwan. (2006), Perspective, Methodology, and
Sharia Accounting Theory, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo
Persada.
Trussel, J.M (2002), Revisiting the prediction of
financial vulnerability, Non-Profit Management and
Leadership”, 13 (1), 17-31
Ward, T. J. & Foster, B. P. (1997), A Note on Selecting a
Response Measure For Financial Distress, Journal of
Business Finance & Accounting, 24(6), 869-879.
Whitaker, R. B. (1999), The Early Stages of Financial
Distress, Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(2),
123-132.
Xiaodongzhang and O. de Jonghe, (2015), The leverage
dynamics of companies, comparison across firm types
An empirical study of US financial and nonfinancial
firms, Tilburg School of Economics and Management
Tilburg University
Zhiyong Li, Jonathan Crook, Galina Andreeva (2017),
Dynamic prediction of financial distress using
Malmquist DEA, Expert Systems With Application,
doi: 10.1016/ j.eswa.2017.03.017
SEABC 2018 - 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference
732