Effects of Ownership Structure and Company Conditions on
Earnings Management
Cynthia Jane and Friska Firnanti
Trisakti School of Management, Kyai Tapa No. 20, 11440, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Earnings Management, Ownership, ROA, Leverage, Operating Cash Flow, and Growth.
Abstract: This research aims to obtain empirical evidences about effects of ownership structure, return on asset, size,
leverage, operating cash flow and sales growth on earnings management. The samples used in this research
was secondary data from annual report of non-financial company listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from
2013-2015. The samples of this research are 285 data using purposive sampling method. The result of this
research shows that institutional ownership, return on asset, leverage, operating cash flow and sales growth
had effect on earnings management, while managerial ownership, board of director size and firm size had
no effect on earnings management.
1 INTRODUCTION
In globalization era and dynamic economic growth,
competition in business area becomes very real.
Each company is trying to be the best to win over
the competition and keep its survival (Scott, 2015).
Management tried to fill the desire of its
shareholders by showing the company’s
performance through the result of financial
statement (Bassiouny, 2016). However, the question
is if the result of financial statement can be reflected
as the real condition faced by the company. The
financial statement can be used for investor and
stakeholders to consider their investment in a
company. However, sometimes, investor and
stakeholders have no further consideration about the
truth behind its financial statement. Management is
the authorized part who published and made its
financial statement. It is possible for them to make
or arrange the financial statement based on their will
which give them the best result for themselves or
other advantages. This can be called as earnings
management practice (Yogi and Damayanthi, 2014).
Earnings management is an intentional act of
management in order to choose accounting policies
used in the firm for several reason or to make benefit
for themself (Fishcher dan Rosenzweirg, 1995).
Management always aims to keep the resources or
fund needed in the company to keep it working well
so external parties cannot intervene them. Several
cases in the world, such as Enron, Xerox, and World
Com, has witnessed that some of management
actions are intentional acts to manage the amount
that showed in financial report for some certain
benefit or another reason (Bassiouny, 2016).
Generally, investor will trust the financial report and
asses the company by the number that showed in
financial statement. So, the number that showed in
financial statement is really important. Both investor
and shareholder will seek management
responsibilities in the company (Ngamchom, 2014).
Earnings management is a signal and can be seen
as an opportunistic behaviour to achieve the targets.
Ownership structure and board of director are
important aspect in corporate governance to lessen
earnings management practice (Liu and Tsai, 2015).
There are different results in previous studies, where
managerial and institutional ownership theoretically
reduces earnings management (Alves, 2012; Alzoubi
and Selamat, 2012). But on the other hand,
managerial ownership and the board of directors are
the decision makers in the company. In addition,
institutional ownership usually has a great strength
in the company, so that it can encourage earnings
management (Al-Fayoumi et al., 2010; Cheng and
Warfield, 2005)
Jane, C. and Firnanti, F.
Effects of Ownership Structure and Company Conditions on Earnings Management.
DOI: 10.5220/0008488700930098
In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM Untar 2018), pages 93-98
ISBN: 978-989-758-363-6
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
93
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Agency Theory
Agency Theory by Jensen and Meckling (1976) is a
theory that underlies current business practice. This
theory is about contractual relationship between
agent and principal. Where there are two parties that
have an interest towards each other called agent and
principal. Agent is the one who was given the job
and responsibilities from principal to do principal’s
job and act like principal for making some decisions
in the company. Agent should also meet principal’s
desires such as maximum principal wealth. Principal
is a person who owned the firm that run by Agent.
Agent also has a self- interest for its own self and
trying to do the work to gain some benefit for itself
besides principal’s benefit.
Earnings management activity is done by
management to fulfill principal’s will by presenting
a financial report according to principal expectations
(Bassiouny, 2016). Management can choose
methods that are used in financial statement which
expected to maintain fluctuation of company’s
income in current period as management will. If
company does not work as well as principal wants, ]
management will try to hide bad condition from
principal. It can be called asymmetry information
which is the condition which principal’s knowledge
is just as far as Agent’s reports to principal.
Principal will give some rewards to management
who has a good performance (Subramanyam, 2014).
Agent also can do earnings management activity for
attracting public and raising funds from the public.
Agents are required to meet principal’s desire and
caused earnings management activities (Scott,
2015).
This research focuses on accrual based earnings
management. This study aims to see whether
managerial ownership and institutional ownership
play an active role in helping company to suppress
earnings management.
2.2 Managerial Ownership and
Earnings Management
Managerial ownership is amount of shares that are
owned by company’s management, who does
operational activity in the company (Tarigan and
Yulius, 2007). Management that owned shares in a
company will have bigger the control of the
company. The management should be engaged to
the company so they will give the best contribution
to the company. When the company makes profit
and achieves its goals, it also gives advantages to
management (Aygun et al., 2014). Thus, managerial
ownership encourages management to make
earnings management. Based on the explanation
above, the following hypothesis will be tested:
H1: Managerial ownership has an effect on earnings
management.
2.3 Institutional Ownership and
Earnings Management
Institutional Ownership is a shared ownership that
owned by institution (Llukani, 2013). Institutional
ownership could give impact to management’s
activity if compared with shares that are owned by
individual (Bukit and Nasution, 2015). It has power
or tools to direct management’s activity and tends to
increase earnings management. Based on the
explanation above, the following hypothesis will be
tested:
H2: Institutional ownership has an effect on earnings
management.
2.4 Board of Director and Earnings
Management
Board of directors is people that have great impact in
a company and they can decide policies that have to
be implemented by a company (Ngamchom, 2015).
The quantity of board of directors can possibly
decrease activity of management earnings in a
company. The more board of director, the stricter the
control to management, so they can work better and
give reliable financial report (Aygun et al., 2014).
The larger the number of board of director can
increase knowledge and capability to prevent
earnings management. Based on the explanation
above, the following hypothesis will be tested:
H3: Board of director has an effect on earnings
management.
2.5 Return on Assets and Earnings
Management
Return on assets is the ability of asset to produce net
income. Company that has high return on assets is a
company that has good performance. It means that
the management has done their job well, so the
possibility of earnings management will be reduced.
If a manager has satisfied with the result of the
performance, they will create financial report with
the real data (Aygun et al., 2014). Based on the
explanation above, the following hypothesis will be
ICEBM Untar 2018 - International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM) Untar
94
tested:
H4: Return on assets has an effect on earnings
management.
2.6 Firm Size and Earnings
Management
Firm Size can be seen from how many assets that a
company has. The larger the company, management
has responsibility to protect company’s name and
reputation. It will reduce earnings management
because it will affect the reputation that company
has built for years. A big company also has good
internal control. Thus, management has to be more
careful and it reduces earnings management
(Bassiouny, 2016). Based on the explanation above,
the following hypothesis will be tested:
H5: Firm size has an effect on earnings
management.
2.7 Leverage and Earnings
Management
Leverage is the ratio of total debt to total asset.
Higher leverage means higher debt. Company with
high leverage has credit covenant that must be
fulfilled so creditor can trust that the company will
pay off the debt (Gitman and Zutter, 2015). Higher
leverage will make strict control from creditor and it
means management will be harder to do earnings
management (Bassiouny, 2016). Based on the
explanation above, the following hypothesis will be
tested:
H6: Leverage has an effect on earnings
management.
2.8 Operating Cash Flow and Earnings
Management
Operating cash flow is a tool to measure the
operational activity of a company that shows
whether the company can produce cash flow to
maintain for operational activity and pays short-term
debt. The flow from operational cash flow can be
used as determinants of a profit quality of a
company because cash flow can be more permanent
than the accrual component (Subramanyam, 2014).
The ratio of high cash flow shows the quality level
of income. Management that has done operational
activity well, do not have to initiative to do earnings
management because the performance of
management has been acknowledged by the investor
(Yuliana and Trisnawati, 2015). Based on the
explanation above, the following hypothesis will be
tested:
H7: Operating cash flow has an effect on earnings
management.
2.9 Sales Growth and Earnings
Management
Sales growth is the increase of sales from previous
year to the current year. When there is an increase of
sales, it can be assumed that the company has a good
growth and a fulfilling development. High sales
growth makes management does not have to do
earnings management because they already
performed well (Gonzalez and Meca, 2014). Based
on the explanation above, the following hypothesis
will be tested:
H8: Sales growth has an effect on earnings
management.
3 METHODS
The populations used in this research are non-
financial companies listed in Indonesian Stock
Exchange (IDX). The samples of this study were
selected by purposive sampling method with several
criteria such as the company should be constantly
listed on IDX since 2013-2015, reports financial
statement using IDR as its currency, has December
31 as its closing period, and has managerial
ownership and institutional ownership. Samples
which meet the criteria above are 95 companies with
295 data.
Earnings management in this study is measured
by discretionary accruals (modified Jones model).
Discretionary accrual is the accrual component that
is chosen by management to report or the component
that management can intervene for financial
statement. Discretionary accrual is measured by the
following regression (Aygun et al., 2014):
TAt = NIt
CFO
t
(1)
TA = DA + NDA ; NDAt = β1j [1/At-1] +
β2j [ΔREVt- ΔARt/At-1] + β3j [PPEt/At-1]
(2)
TACt/At-1 = β1j [1/At-1] + β2j [(ΔREVt –
ΔARt)]/ A
t
-1 + β3
j
[PPEt/ A
t
-1] +ε
t
(3)
DAjt = TACjt/Ajt-1 – NDAjt (4)
Where:
TAt: Total Accrual in year t; NIt: Net Income in
year t ; CFOt: Cash flow from operating activities in
year t ; TA: Total accruals ; DA: Discretionary
Effects of Ownership Structure and Company Conditions on Earnings Management
95
Accruals NDA: Non – Discretionary Accruals ;
NDAt: Non-discretionary accruals in year t ; At-1:
Total asset in prior years ; ΔREVt: change in income
in year t ; ΔARt: change in receivable in year t;
PPEt: gross PPE in year t ; β1j, β2j, β3j: specific
parameter.
Managerial Ownership is percentage of share
that owned by management, measured by ratio scale
and calculated by percentage of share that is owned
by management (Aygun et al., 2014). Institutional
ownership is percentage of share that is owned by
institutional such as bank, insurance company,
investment company, and other institutional
companies. Institutional ownership measured by
ratio scale and calculated by percentage of shares
that owned by institutional shareholders (Aygun et
al., 2014).
Board of director is a person that has so many
impacts on the company, the one who has a part of
making decision and deciding other policies in the
company. Board of director measured by ratio scale
and calculated by number of board of directors in the
company (Aygun et al., 2014). Return on Asset is
the ratio which divided net income and total assets.
ROA is measured by ratio scale and calculated by
net income to total asset (Aygun et al., 2014).
Firm Size is the size of company which can be
seen from total asset, average of sales, and market
price of share in the company. Firm size in this study
measured by ratio scale and calculated by natural
logarithm of total asset (Aygun et al., 2014).
Leverage is an analysis of credit in company and
used to assess amount of debt to finance its asset in
order to do their operations beyond the resources of
capital and equity. Leverage measured by ratio scale
and calculated by total debt to total asset (Aygun et
al., 2014).
Operating Cash flow is measured by ratio scale
and calculated by cash flow from operating activities
to total asset (Yuliana dan Trisnawati, 2015). Sales
growth is an increasing of total sales in compare
with sales prior year. Growth is measured by ratio
scale and calculated by percentage change of sales
(Gonzalez and Meca, 2014).
4 RESEARCH RESULT
The result of the statistical test can be seen in
hypothesis result shown in table 1 below:
Table 1: Hypothesis Result.
Model
t
Sig.
(Constant) 0.318 0.751
Managerial Ownership 1.828 0.069
Institutional Ownership 2.748 0.006
Board of Directo
r
-1.223 0.222
ROA 31.098 0.000
Firm Size -0.479 0.633
Leverage -2.586 0.010
CFO -46.584 0.000
Sales Growth -3.110 0.002
Table 1 shows that managerial ownership has no
effect on earnings management activities. Shares
that owned by management are only a small fraction
of total shares outstanding so it has no effect on
management acts and decisions. The result of this
research is consistent with Yogi and Damayanthi
(2016), Susanto (2013), Destriana and Arifin (2016),
and Agustia (2013). Institutional ownership has an
effect on earnings management activities. Company
with a large number of shares that are owned by an
institution makes the institution can control the
existing activity in the company directly or
indirectly. The possibility of earnings management
activity for institutional purposes will be higher than
personal ownership. The result of this study is
consistent with Destriana and Arifin (2016).
Return on Asset has an effect on earnings
management activities. It means when the
performance of company is in poor or good
condition, management will intend to do
opportunistic activity, such as increasing or
decreasing company’s income according to real
condition that is faced by the company. The result of
this study is consistent with Usman and Yero (2012).
Leverage has an effect on earnings management
activities. It shows low leverage levels in a company
made the management tried to do some activities to
keep showing good circumstances to its shareholders
and stakeholders. The result of this study is
consistent with Yuliana and Trisnawati (2015), and
Kusumaningtyas (2012).
Cash flow from operation has an effect on
earnings management activities. When operating
cash flow increases, the income of the company will
decrease, thus cash inflow is getting smaller and it
encourages management intention to do earnings
management activities to show the good state of
company. The result of this research is consistent
with Christiani and Nugrahanti (2014), Yuliana and
Trisnawati (2015).
Sales Growth has an effect on earnings
management activities. Company with great number
of sales and growth of sales from year to year shows
good circumstances and improvements of the
company, so it suppressed management intention to
do earnings management. The result if this study is
consistent with Llukani (2013).
ICEBM Untar 2018 - International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM) Untar
96
On the other hand, board size and firm size have
no effect on earnings management activities. It
shows that the number of board of directors has no
effect on the board’s optimal function to detect
earnings management and no matter how big or
small the company, management does not make it as
a consideration to do earnings management
activities.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The result of this research shows that institutional
ownership, return on asset, leverage, operating cash
flow, and sales growth have effect on earnings
management and on the other hand, managerial
ownership, board size, and firm size have no effect
on earnings management activities. Institutional
ownership as a shareholder who has a large portion
of the company can play a role in earnings
management practices. While managerial ownership
in non-financial companies in Indonesia has a
relatively small portion of shares, it does not have
the power as much as institutional ownership. This
research has some limitations. The research only
used samples three years period from 2013-2015,
and the samples were only non-financial companies
listed in IDX. Another research should add period of
the research of the samples, and compare conditions
in different countries. Further research may add
another variable such as audit quality.
REFERENCES
Agustia, Dian, 2013. Effects of Good Corporate
Governance, Free Cash Flow, and Leverage on
Earnings Management. Jurnal Akuntansi dan
Keuangan, Vol. 15, No.1: 27-42.
Al-Fayoumi, Nedal, Bana Abuzayed and David
Alexander, 2010. Ownership Structure and Earnings
Management in Emerging Markets: The case of
Jordan. International Research Journal of Finance
and Economics, Vol. 38: 28-47.
Alves, Sandra, 2012. Ownership Structure and Earnings
Management: Evidence from Portugal. Australasian
Accounting Business & Finance Journal, Vol. 6, No.
1: 57-73.
Alzoubi, E. S. Salem and M. H. Selamat, 2012. Proposing
a Conceptual Framework for Reducing Earnings
Management Using an Ownership Structure
Mechanism: Jordanian Companies Perspective.
Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management,
Vol. 3, No. 2: 58-78.
Aygun, et al, 2014. The Effects of Corporate Ownership
Structure and Board Size on Earnings Management:
Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of
Business and Management, Vol. 9, No.2.
Bassiouny, S. W., 2016. The Impact of Firm
Characteristics on Earnings Management: an
Empirical Study on the Listed Firms in Egypt. Journal
of Business and Retail Management Research. Vol. 3,
No.3.
Bukit, R. B. and Nasution, F. N., 2015. Employee Diff,
Free Cash Flow, Corporate Governance and Earnings
Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, Vol. 2, No.211: 585 – 594.
Cheng, Q. and T. D. Warfield, 2005. Equity Incentives
and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review,
Vol. 80, No. 2: 441-476.
Christiani, Ingrid dan Yeterina.W.N., 2014. Effects of
Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Jurnal
Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 16, No.1: 52-62.
Destriana, Nicken dan Lavenia Arifin, 2016. Effect of
Firm Size, Corporate Governance, and Company
Characteristics on Earnings Management. Jurnal
Bisnis dan Akuntansi, Vol. 18, No.1: 84-93.
Fischer, Marly and Kenneth Rozenzweigg, 1995. Attitude
of Student Practitiones Concerting the Ethical
Acceptability of Earnings Management. Journal of
Business Ethic, Vol.14: 433- 444.
Gitman, Lawrence J. and Chad J. Zutter, 2015. Principles
of Managerial Finance. United States of America:
Pearson Education LTD.
Gonzales, Jesus Saenz dan Emma Garcia Meca, 2014.
Does Corporate Governance Influence Earnings
Management in Latin American Markets? Journal of
Business Ethics, Vol. 121, No. 3: 419-440.
Jensen, M. C. and W. Meckling, 1976, Theory of The
Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and
Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics,
Vol. 3, No. 4: 305-360.
Kusumaningtyas, Metta. 2012, Effect of Independence
Audit Committee and Institutional Ownership on
Earnings Management. Prestasi, Vol. 9, No. 1: 41-61.
Liu, Jo Lan and Tsai Ching Chieh, 2015. Board Member
Characteristics and Ownership Structure Impacts on
Real Earnings Management: Evidence from Taiwan.
Accounting and Finance Research, Vol. 4, No. 4: 84-
96.
Llukani, Teuta, 2013. Earnings Management and Firm
Size: An Empirical Analyze in Albanian Market.
European Scientific Journal, Vol. 9, No. 16: 135-143.
Ngamchom, Wasukarn, 2015. Impact of Board
Effectiveness and Shareholders Structure on Earnings
Management in Thailand. Review Integrative Business
and Economic Research, Vol. 4, No. 2.
Scott, William R., 2015. Financial Accounting Theory.
Canada: Pearson Canada Inc.
Subramanyam, K.R., 2014. Financial Statement Analysis.
Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Edition.
Tarigan, Josua. and Yulius, Y. C., 2007. Managerial
Ownerhip: Debt Policy, Performance, and Firm Value.
Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 9, No. 1: 1-8.
Effects of Ownership Structure and Company Conditions on Earnings Management
97
Usman, Shebu H. and Jibril Ibrahim Yero, 2012.
Ownership Concentration and Earnings Management
Practice of Nigerian Listed Conglomerates. American
International Journal of Contemporary Research, Vol.
2, No. 7: 157-171.
Yuliana, Agustin dan Ita Trisnawati, 2015. Effect of
Auditor and Financial Ratio on Earnings Management.
Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, Vol. 17, No. 1: 33-45.
Yogi, Luh Made Dwi Parama dan I Gusti Ayu Eka
Damayanthi, 2016. Effects of Free Cash Flows,
Capital Adequacy Ratio and Good Corporate
Governance on Earnings Management. e-Jurnal
Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, Vol. 15, No. 2: 1056-
1085.
ICEBM Untar 2018 - International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM) Untar
98