4 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
4.1 Analysis of the Internal illuminance
distribution
After the internal illuminance distribution value of
the sky component was obtained, it was then
analysed to determine the optimal window variant
among the three variants of the window positions.
The analysis of the distribution used standard
deviation and mean equations. The standard
deviation of the internal illuminance in a
predetermined room was found using equation (6).
(6)
Meanwhile, the mean of the internal illuminance
in the room was found using equation (7).
(7)
4.2 Internal illuminance distribution
Results
The results of the analysis of the internal
illuminance distribution was illustrated using colors
(Table. 2), with the lowest illuminance of 0–65 lux
being represented by dark blue-yellowish blue,
medium illuminance of 66–237 lux being
represented by yellow-orange, and the highest
illuminance of 238–822 lux being represented by
orange-bright red. The analysis of the window
samples is described below.
4.2.1 Sample A
The room with a window in the middle had three
areas, namely one with the lowest illuminance of 0–
65 lux (63% dark blue area-yellowish blue), one
with medium illuminance of 66–237 lux (27%
orange), and one with the highest illuminance of
238–822 lux (10% orange-bright red), with
illumination tending to be distributed in front of the
window. From the 300 reference points in the
sample area, a mean (AEi) of 86.2 lux and a
standard deviation (SEi) of 149.5 lux were obtained.
4.2.2 Sample B
The room with a window located on the edge had
three areas, namely one with the lowest illuminance
of 0–65 lux (66% dark blue-yellowish blue), one
with medium illumination of 66–237 lux (24.3%
orange), and one with the highest illuminance of
238–822 lux (9.7% orange-bright red), with
illumination tending to be distributed in front of the
window. From the 300 reference points in the
sample area, a mean (AEi) of 93.46 lux and a
standard deviation (SEi) of 145.8 lux were obtained.
4.2.3 Sample C
The room with a window located in the corner had
three areas, namely one with the lowest illuminance
of 0–65 lux (71% dark blue-yellowish blue), one
with medium illuminance of 66–237 lux (20%
orange), and one with the highest illuminance of
238–822 lux (9% orange-bright red), with
illumination tending to be distributed in front of the
window. From the 300 reference points in the
sample area, a mean (AEi) of 86.2 lux and a
standard deviation (SEi) of 149.5 lux were.
Based on the description of Sample A, Sample B,
and Sample C, we show the results of the
explanation in the Df and illumination value on the
number of sides of the 3D reconstruction (from the
simulation we created) as in Table 2.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the standard deviation and mean values,
the room with the biggest mean and the smallest
standard deviation of the three sample rooms was
the room which had the most optimal value of
internal illuminance distribution. It can be concluded
that in this study, of the three room samples studied,
the position of window openings that had the
optimal internal illuminance distribution value was
one of Sample A, with the window opening
positioned in the middle of the wall plane.
The more the window opening position is away
from the side of the wall, the smaller the value of the
internal illuminance distribution, meaning that if the
room is far apart, the opening of the window will
darken. On the contrary, if the wall is closer to the
window opening, the value of the internal
illuminance distribution will be greater, meaning
that the room will be brighter.
This research proves quantitatively that the
position of window openings can affect the value of
sky component on daylight factor and internal
illuminance. This is evidenced when the window
openings in the room are shifted, the value of