became more than the uncontrolled model. It is
contrast to the inclusion of 2 controls on the model
so that it looked better and stable with fewer
populations than uncontrolled models and models
with 1 control. In other words, the addition of
medication control successfully suppressed the
growing Infectious population and infecting
Exposed population.
Figure 3: Infectious
From Figure 3, it can be seen that with 1
control in the reduction of the frequency of
contacts in the model, the Infectious population
tended to decrease, but at certain intervals, at t=9
from Figure 3, the Infectious population would
increase again. It was different with the model
subjected to 2 controls. The addition of optimal
treatment control was faster to reduce Infectious
populations. The results were better than models
with 1 control and without control because
Infectious stable populations did not increase
again.
Figure 4: Treated
Figure 4 shows the same thing that with the
implementation of 1 control on the model, the
Treated population decreased, illustrating that
many individuals have returned to good health
after receiving treatment, but the decrease was
temporary because the Treated population
increased again sometimes. We see in the model
subjected 2 controls, at first, it appears that
Treated population number was more than
Treated population number in the model with 1
control. It does not mean a model with 1 control
was better because in the end, the model with 2
controls had fewer populations than the model
with 1 control and without control. At the
beginning of time, the model with 2 controls had
more population than the model with 1 control due
to the addition of medication controls to the
Infectious population so that infectious
populations were treated and the Treated
population increased. Thus, the Treated
population would decrease optimally because the
Infectious population also decreased significantly.
4 CONCLUSIONS
From the exposure of the model of TB disease that
has been given 1 control in the form of reduction of
contact with the infectious individual population, then
it can be drawn outline that the controls were applied
well. However, there are some conditions that
describe those controls but need to be refined, such as
when the declining population of Susceptible,
population of Exposed, Infectious and Treated wetr
increasing. With the application of 2 controls, i.e., the
addition of optimal treatment control, then the
weakness of the model with 1 control can be resolved.
This 2-control model (5)(6)(7)(8) is highly
effective for reducing the number of infected
individuals in the Tuberculosis model by considering
the simulation results from Susceptible, Exposed,
Infectious and Treated population satisfying from
each expected condition.
REFERENCES
B. Miller., 1993. Preventive therapy for tuberculosis, Med.
Clin. North Am.
B. R. Bloom., 1994. Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis,
Protection, and Control, ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
Castillo-Chavez, C. and Feng, Z., 1997. To Treat or Not to
Treat: The Case of Tuberculosis J. Math. Biol.
Crofton, S.J., Horne, M., and Miller, F., 2002. Clinical
Tuberculosis, MacMilan Education Ltd, London.