Correlation between Science Process Skills and the Comprehension of
Physics Concept with Critical Thinking Skills on Newton’s Laws
Haris Rosdianto, Emi Sulistri, Rosmaiyadi, Mariyam, Nurul Husna, Nindy Citroresmi Prihatingtyas,
Rika Wahyuni, Nurhayati, Citra Utami
Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Singkawang, Jl. STKIP, Kelurahan Naram, Kecamatan
Singkawang Utara, Kota Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, 79251, Indonesia
Keywords: Science Process Skills, Comprehension of Physics Concept, Critical Thinking Skills, Product Moment
Correlation, Partial Correlation, Multiple Correlation.
Abstract: The goal of this study was to determine: 1) whether there is a correlation between science process skills with
critical thinking skills, 2) whether there is a correlation between the comprehension of physics concept with
critical thinking skills, 3) whether there is a correlation between science process skills and the comprehension
of physics concept together with the critical thinking skills on Newton’s Law. This research is a correlation
study between three variables using correlation product moment and multiple correlations. The population
was all students of Mathematics Education Study Programme of STKIP Singkawang taking Fundamental
Physics 1 in Academic Years 2017/2018. Due to consists of only one class, then the sampling technique used
was saturation sampling. The instruments in this study were multiple-choice test with reasoned respectively
of 10 questions to measure science process skills, the comprehension of physics concept , and critical thinking
skills. All datas were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis techniques. Research hypothesis testing
conducted at significance level α = 0.05, show that 1) There is a correlation between science process skills
with critical thinking skills, demonstrated by correlation coefficient r
X1Y
= 0.812 and partial correlation
coefficient 0.704. This suggests there is a positive correlation between science process skills with critical
thinking skills by 70.4%. 2) There is a correlation between the comprehension of physics concept with critical
thinking skills, demonstrated by correlation coefficient r
X2Y
= 0.628 and partial correlation coefficient 0.321.
This suggests there is a positive correlation between the comprehension of physics concept with critical
thinking skills by 32.1%. 3) There is a correlation between science process skills and the comprehension of
physics concept with science process skills, demonstrated by the multiple correlation coefficients R
2
= 0.833.
This suggests there is a positive correlation between science process skills and the comprehension of concept
physics with critical thinking skills by 83.3%.
1 INTRODUCTION
There are three essential aspects of the objectives of
physics learning, namely (1) the ability to process; (2)
building knowledge in the form of an understanding
of concepts, laws, and theories and their application;
(3) scientific attitudes, among others, the tendency of
science, critical thinking, analytical thinking,
attention to the problem of science, awards on things
that are science (Sumaji 1998). It is clear that there
are some abilities that must be acquired and
developed within the students to achieve the goals of
physics learning. These skills include science process
skills, conceptual understanding, and critical thinking
skills.
Scientific process skills can be defined as a complex
intellectual, manual and social, intellectually and
intellectually complex physical skills tool used by
scientists to conduct scientific investigations
(Karamustafaoğlu 2011) (Aji et al. 2014)
(Khaeruddin & Wasis 2016). These skills facilitate
physical science learning, generate active
participation, develop a sense of self-responsibility,
enhance learning sustainability, acquire methods and
research methods that think and behave like a
scientist (Raj & Devi 2015). In addition, the skills of
the science process are seen as the basis for the
increasingly complex of other thinking skills.
Through a series of scientific processes that students
must pass through observation activities, problem
42
Rosdianto, H., Sulistri, E., Rosmaiyadi, ., Mariyam, ., Husna, N., Citroresmi Prihatingtyas, N., Wahyuni, R., Nurhayati, . and Citra Utami, .
Correlation between Science Process Skills and the Comprehension of Physics Concept with Critical Thinking Skills on Newton’s Laws.
DOI: 10.5220/0009016100002297
In Proceedings of the Borneo International Conference on Education and Social Sciences (BICESS 2018), pages 42-47
ISBN: 978-989-758-470-1
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
formulation and hypothesis, hypothesis testing
through experiments, variable control, interpretation
of data, conclusion and application of concepts
(Choirunnisa et al. 2018) (Rosdianto et al. 2017)
(Sulistri & Lisdawati 2017). It is clear that the skills
of the science process is very important applied to
students in achieving the goals of physics learning as
previously described. This is reinforced by
Siradjuddin, et al, the skills of the science process is
very important to develop the science of education
and the quality of student learning both the theory and
skills in experimenting, especially in studying
physics (Siradjuddin et al. 2018).
Not only for the basis of scientific investigation and
the enhancer of complex scientific thinking skills, the
application of science process skills to students can
also tackle the attitude needed to understand a
concept (Anderson 2002) (Jack 2013). The linkage of
conceptual understanding with the skills of the
process of science is shown in the construction of the
student’s concept (Sulistri et al. 2016). The more
science process skilled, the better the structure of the
conceptual understanding acquired, and the
decreasing the science process skill possessed, the
narrower the structure of conceptual understanding
acquired (Siswono 2015). Conceptual understanding
is the foundation and important stage in the series in
physics learning (Rosdianto 2017). By understanding
the concept, students have a foundation to understand
the material provided and useful in solving the given
problems, such as making assumptions, choosing a
procedure that facilitates the solution of the problem.
In addition, the understanding of the concept of
science can also be a provision for learners to learn
about themselves and the natural surroundings, as
well as a foundation in solving problems in everyday
life (Putra et al. 2015), then this issue provides an
opportunity to explore or investigate of course with
questions so that theorems, propositions, notions and
new concepts can be raised from the issues proposed
(Citroresmi & Suratman 2016).
In addition to the science process skills and the ability
to understand the concept, the third most important
thing according to the aspect of the goal of physics
learning is critical thinking skills. Critical thinking is
a systematic thinking process that makes it possible
to formulate and decide and emphasizes the beliefs
themselves both logically and rationally that provide
a set of standard procedures to analyze, test and
evaluate each decision appropriately (Khaeruddin &
Wasis 2016) (Wahyuni et al. 2018) (Nadiya et al.
2016) (Irhamna et al. 2017). Alatas and Sari et al.,
states that through the skills of critical thinking,
students' cognitive intelligence can be trained and
developed, and with the knowledge they possess can
connect facts or information to make a predicted
outcome. Students who are critical in physics learning
can learn how to look at their self-consciousness
symptoms, and approach the situation objectively and
logically (Alatas 2014) (Sari et al. 2016). For this
reason, as reported by Magno and Robert, critical
thinking skill strongly supports learners' success in
learning, so improving and developing this ability is
one of the goals in learning to be achieved (Magno
2010) (Marzano 1988). So by having critical thinking
skills in the learning of physics, students will try to
find the problem and try to solve it both in learning
on campus or in everyday life.
Based on the three capabilities students must possess,
this study looks for correlation of science process
skills and conceptual understanding of students'
critical thinking skills on Newton's legal material.
Newton's law is an important part of mechanics and
dynamics that describes a force acting on an object
(Sari et al. 2016). Newton's law is a meteor that
discusses the relationship between internal and
external forces acting on an object and its motion
(Halliday & Resnick 2008) (Serway & Jewet 2010).
In general before the student level, in Newton's legal
material, students have difficulty in identifying types
of styles, having errors in answering questions about
style and motion, many having misconceptions, and
students still have difficulty in representing concepts
or sentences in the form of a mathematical language,
charts, diagrams and so forth (Türker 2005) (Kohl &
Finkelstein 2008) (Brookes & Etkina 2009)
(Anderson 2002) (Pablico 2010) (Nguyen & Rebello
2011) (Docktor & Mestre 2014) (Fadaei & Mora
2015) (Ergin 2016). The difficulties and
misconceptions experienced in Newton's legal
material are indicated by the conceptual
understanding of low style and motion discussions
and low critical thinking skills (Chia 1996)
(Eraikhuemen & Ogumogu 2014). Obviously this is
closely related to the skills of science process skills,
because conceptual understanding will be better and
meaningful if students find their own concepts
learned through the process of science (Putra et al.
2015).
Characteristics of Newton's legal material demanded
the balance of processes and products, thus raising
questions to the researcher whether the skills of
science processes and understanding of student
concepts have a positive correlation with their critical
thinking skills. The purpose of this research is to
know: 1) correlation between science process skills
with critical thinking skills; 2) the correlation
between conceptual understanding with critical
Correlation between Science Process Skills and the Comprehension of Physics Concept with Critical Thinking Skills on Newton’s Laws
43
thinking skills; and 3) the correlation between science
process skills and understanding of physics concepts
with students' critical thinking skills on Newton's
Law material.
2 RESEARCH METHODS
This study includes the type of correlation research
between the three variables using methods product
moment correlation and multiple correlation. The
population of this research is Mathematics Education
Students at STKIP Singkawang who take Basic
Physics I course in Academic Year 2017/2018. The
technique sampling used is sampling saturated.
Technique sampling is due to only consist of one
sample class only. The instrument in this study is a
multiple choice test grounded in which each item
consists of 10 items to measure the skills of the
science process, the understanding of physics
concepts, and the critical thinking skills of the
students. Data analysis using descriptive analysis
technique. Data processing correlation between
variables using correlation equation product-moment
and multiple correlation.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Results
3.1.1 Correlation between Science Process
Skills with Critical Thinking Skills
The first hypothesis in this study is about the
correlation between science process skills with
students' critical thinking skills on Newton's Law
material tested by using product moment correlation
and partial correlation. The results of the correlation
test between the skills of the science process with
students' critical thinking skills on Newton's Law
materials are presented in the following Table 1.
Table 1: Correlation Analysis Between Science Process
Skills And Critical Thinking Skills
r
X1Y
r
p
Description
0.812 0.704 Positive
Based on Table 1 shows that the correlation
coefficient r
X1Y
= 0.812 and partial correlation
coefficient of 0.704. This shows that there is a
positive correlation between science process skill and
student's critical thinking skill which is 70.4%.
Furthermore, to see linearity between science process
skills with students' critical thinking skills on
Newton's Law material conducted a simple linear
regression analysis test. The result of simple linear
regression test of linearity between science process
skill and student's critical thinking skill is presented
in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Linearity Test Between Science Process Skills And
Critical Thinking Skills
a b t
obs
t
c.v.
Decision
18.635 0.981 54.614 3.35 Ho rejected
Based on Table 2, it is known for data with a
significant level of 0.05 value t
c.v.
that is equal to
54.614 bigger than value of t
obs
that is equal to 3.35,
hence can be concluded that Ho is rejected, so the
equation is linear or Science process skill (X
1
) has
relationship with Critical Thinking Skill (Y).
3.1.2 Correlation between Understandings
of Physics Concept with Critical
Thinking Skills
The second hypothesis in this research is about the
correlation between the understanding of physics
concepts with students' critical thinking skills on
Newton's Law material tested by using product
moment correlation and partial correlation. The
results of the correlation test between the
understandings of physics concepts with students'
critical thinking skills on Newton's Law materials are
presented in the following Table 3.
Table 3: Analysis Correlation Between Understandings Of
Physical Concepts With Critical Thinking Skills
r
X2Y
r
p
Description
0.628 0.321 Positive
Based on Table 3 shows that the correlation
coefficient r
X2Y
= 0.628 and partial correlation
coefficient of 0.321. This shows that there is a
positive correlation between the understanding of
physics concept and students' critical thinking skill
which is 3.21%. Furthermore, to see linearity between
the understandings of physics concepts with students'
critical thinking skills on Newton's Law material
conducted a simple linear regression analysis test.
The result of simple linear regression test between the
understanding of physics concept and students'
critical thinking skill is presented in Table 4 below.
BICESS 2018 - Borneo International Conference On Education And Social
44
Table 4: Linearity Test Between Understanding Of Physics
Concept And Critical Thinking Skills
a b t
obs
t
c.v.
Decision
19.534 0.750 18.218 3.35 Ho rejected
Based on Table 4, it is known for data with a
significant 0.05 value of t
obs
that is equal to 19.534
bigger than value t
c.v.
that is equal to 3.35, hence can
be concluded that Ho is rejected, so the equation is
linear or understanding of physics concept (X
2
) has
relationship with critical thinking skill (Y).
3.1.3 Correlation between Science Process
Skills and Understanding of Physics
Concepts with Critical Thinking Skills
The third hypothesis in this research is about the
correlation between science process skills and
understanding of physics concepts with students'
critical thinking skills on Newton's Law material
tested using multiple correlation. The results of the
correlation test between the understandings of
physics concepts with students' critical thinking skills
on Newton's Law materials are presented to the
following Table 5.
Table 5: Correlation Analysis Between Science Process
Skills And Understanding Of Physics Concepts With
Critical Thinking Skills
r
X1X2Y
R
2
Description
0.833 0.694 Positive
Based on Table 5 shows that the double correlation
coefficient of 0.833. This indicates a positive
correlation between the science process skills and the
understanding of physics concepts with critical
thinking skills of 8.33% students. Furthermore, to see
linearity between the science process skills and
understanding of physics concepts with students'
critical thinking skills on Newton's Law material
conducted a simple linear regression analysis test.
The result of simple linear regression test of linearity
between science process skill and understanding of
physics concept with students' critical thinking skill is
presented in Table 6 below.
Table 6: Linearity Test Between Science Process Skills And
Understanding Of Physics Concepts With Critical Thinking
Skills
a b c t
obs
t
c.v.
Decision
8.685 0.817 0.276 30.668 3.35 Ho rejected
Based on Table 6, data with a significant level of 0.05
value of t
obs
that is equal to 30.668 bigger than value
of t
c.v.
that is equal to 3.35, hence can be concluded
that Ho is rejected, so the equation is linear or science
process skill (X
1
), understanding of physics concept
(X
2
) together have linear relation to Critical thinking
skills (Y).
3.2 Discussion
The results of the first hypothesis and data analysis
show that there is a positive correlation between
science process skills and students' critical thinking
skills. The emergence of a positive correlation
because when students have the science process skills
in learning, the physical and mental abilities that are
intellectual, manual and social also develop. So that
critical thinking skills can also increase. This is in line
with the results of Spiritual research which shows that
there is a strong correlation between the science
process skills and students' critical thinking. Means
the higher the science process skills, the higher the
critical thinking.
Results of research and analysis of the second data
indicate that there is a positive correlation between
the ability of conceptual understanding with students'
critical thinking skills. In accordance with the results
of research Sari, et al., the ability to think critically
and understanding the concept of Newton's legal
material has a very strong positive correlation with
correlation coefficient value 0.845 and has a value of
71% determination, so that critical thinking skills has
a relationship with understanding the concept on
Newton's legal material, whereas students 'critical
thinking skills on Newton's legal material have
increased, the students' understanding of Newton's
legal material will also increase (Sari et al. 2016).
Positive correlation can occur because when students
have a good conceptual understanding, then the
knowledge it has will lead to always find out what
things are being studied. Things are formulated in a
problem to solve the problem, then the students will
perform thinking activities. Some studies show that
when students have high critical thinking skills,
students will easily understand concepts and seek
alternative solutions to solve problems and make
appropriate and reasonable conclusions (Marzano
1988).
The result of third hypothesis and data analysis shows
that there is a positive correlation between science
process skill and conceptual understanding to
students' critical thinking skill. The existence of this
positive correlation because when students have the
science processes skill in learning simultaneously the
ability to conceptual understanding also developed.
So that students' critical thinking skills can also
Correlation between Science Process Skills and the Comprehension of Physics Concept with Critical Thinking Skills on Newton’s Laws
45
increase. Science process skills are the physical and
mental skills associated with the fundamental abilities
possessed, controlled and applied in a scientific
activity, so that scientists succeed in finding
something new (Nasution 2007). With the science
process skills, students become trained to know from
the basic things so that they can acquire and develop
their knowledge. Simultaneously the ability of
conceptual understanding comes along. Conceptual
understanding is the individual's ability to understand
a particular concept (Nasution 2000). That way,
students who have a conceptual understanding,
knowledge is also growing and growing. Students
become more understanding about a concept, can
interpret it, and even apply it. In line with this,
according to Putra et al., a student has had a
conceptual understanding when students have had
meaning or meaning of a concept (Putra et al. 2015).
Based on that opinion, students who have a good
understanding of the concept will become more
critical in facing problems. So that students' critical
thinking skills can also improve for the better.
It can be concluded that students who have the
science process skill and good conceptual
understanding in learning will have good critical
thinking skills. In other words, the higher the science
process skill and the students 'conceptual
understanding the higher the students' critical
thinking skills. So the science process skill and
student conceptual understanding are two variables
which together give positive correlation to student's
critical thinking skill variable.
4 CONCLUSION
Conclusions derived from the correlation between
science process skills and conceptual understanding
with critical thinking skills students are as follows:
(1) there is a positive correlation between the skills of
science process with students' critical thinking skill in
Newton's Law material is 70.4%, Ho is rejected. (2)
There is a positive correlation between the
understandings of physics concepts with students'
critical thinking skills on Newton's Law material is
3.21%, Ho is rejected. (3) There is a positive
correlation between the science process skills and the
understanding of physics concepts with students'
critical thinking skills on Newton's Law material of
8.33%, Ho is rejected.
REFERENCES
Aji, A.C., Santosa, S. & Probosari, R.M., 2014. Pengaruh
Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis
Joyful Learning (Inter-joy) terhadap Keterampilan
Proses Sains Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Surakarta
Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Bio-Pedagogi, 3(1),
pp.23–36.
Alatas, F., 2014. Hubungan Pemahaman Konsep Dengan
Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Model
Pembelajaran Treffinger Pada Mata Kuliah Fisika
Dasar. Edusains, 6(1), pp.87–96.
Anderson, R.D., 2002. Reforming science teaching: What
research says about inquiry. Journal of science teacher
education, 13(1), pp.1–12.
Brookes, D.T. & Etkina, E., 2009. Force,” ontology, and
language. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics
Education Research, 5(1), p.010110.
Chia, T.C., 1996. Common misconceptions in frictional
force among university physics students. Teaching and
Learning, 16(2), pp.107–116.
Choirunnisa, N.L., Prabowo, P. & Suryanti, S., 2018.
Improving Science Process Skills for Primary School
Students Through 5E Instructional Model-Based
Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
947(1).
Citroresmi, N. & Suratman, D., 2016. Pengembangan
Modul Matematika Berbasis Masalah untuk
Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penyelesaian Masalah dan
Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan
dan Pembelajaran, 5(4).
Docktor, J.L. & Mestre, J.P., 2014. Synthesis of discipline-
based education research in physics. Physical Review
Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2),
p.020119.
Eraikhuemen, L. & Ogumogu, A.E., 2014. An assessment
of secondary school physics teachers conceptual
understanding of force and motion in Edo South
senatorial district. Academic Research International,
5(1), p.253.
Ergin, S., 2016. The Effect of Group Work on
Misconceptions of 9th Grade Students about Newton’s
Laws. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6),
pp.127–136.
Fadaei, A.S. & Mora, C., 2015. An investigation about
misconceptions in force and motion in high school. US-
China Education Review, 5(1), pp.38–45.
Halliday, D. & Resnick, R., 2008. Fundamental of Physics
8th ed., United States of America: John Wiley & Sonic,
inc.
Irhamna, Rosdianto, H. & Murdani, E., 2017. Penerapan
Model Learning Cycle 5E untuk Meningkatkan
Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Fluida
Statis Kelas VIII. Jurnal Fisika FLUX, 14(1), pp.61–
64.
Jack, G.U., 2013. The influence of identified student and
school variables on students’ science process skills
acquisition. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(5),
pp.16–22.
BICESS 2018 - Borneo International Conference On Education And Social
46
Karamustafaoğlu, S., 2011. Improving the science process
skills ability of prospective science teachers using I
diagrams. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry
Education, 3(1), pp.26–38.
Khaeruddin, K. & Wasis, M., 2016. Fostering Critical
Thinking Skill through Optimizing Science Process
Skills in Physics Learning. IOSR Journal of Research
& Method in Education, 6(6), pp.103–108.
Kohl, P.B. & Finkelstein, N.D., 2008. Patterns of multiple
representation use by experts and novices during
physics problem solving. Physical Review Special
Topics-Physics Education Research, 4(1), p.010111.
Magno, C., 2010. The role of metacognitive skills in
developing critical thinking. Metacognition and
learning, 5(2), pp.137–156.
Marzano, R.J., 1988. Dimensions of thinking: A framework
for curriculum and instruction, The Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development, 125 N.
West St., Alexandria, VA 22314-2798.
Nadiya, Rosdianto, H. & Murdani, E., 2016. Penerapan
Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation (GI) untuk
Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada
Materi Gerak Lurus Kelas X. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu
Pendidikan Fisika), 1(2), pp.49–51.
Nasution, N., 2007. Pendidikan IPA di SD, Jakarta:
Universitas Terbuka.
Nasution, S., 2000. Berbagai pendekatan dalam proses
belajar dan mengajar, PT. Bina Aksara.
Nguyen, D.-H. & Rebello, N.S., 2011. Students’
Difficulties With Multiple Representations in
Introductory Mechanics. Online Submission, 8(5),
pp.559–569.
Pablico, J.R., 2010. Misconceptions on force and gravity
among high school students. Louisiana State
University.
Putra, N.A.R., Abdurrahman, A. & Suana, W., 2015.
Pengaruh Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Sikap Ilmiah
terhadap Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa SMP. Jurnal
Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(4).
Raj, R.G. & Devi, S.N., 2015. Science Process Skills
Achievement In Science Among High School Students.
Scholarly Research Journal For Interdisilinary Studies,
2(15), pp.2435–2443.
Rosdianto, H., 2017. Students’ Conceptual Understanding
through Generative Learning Model in Topic" Light.
JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(2), pp.259–262.
Rosdianto, H., Murdani, E. & Hendra, 2017. Implementasi
Model Pembelajaran POE (Predict Observe Explain)
untuk Meningkatkan Pemahamaan Konsep Siswa pada
Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1),
pp.55–57.
Sari, A.L.R., Parno & Taufiq, A., 2016. Kemampuan
Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa
SMA pada Materi Hukum Newton. In Pros. Semnas
Pend. IPA. Pasca Sarjana UM, pp. 88–89.
Serway, R.A. & Jewet, J.W., 2010. Physics for Scientists
and Engeneers with Modern Physics 8th ed., Belmont/
Cole Cengange Learning.
Siradjuddin, Rosdianto, H. & Sulistri, E., 2018. Penerapan
model REACT untuk meningkatkan keterampilan
proses sains siswa pada materi arus listrik. Jurnal
Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 4(1), pp.17–
22.
Siswono, H., 2015. Pengaruh Problem Based Learning
Berbantuan Kombinasi Real Dan Virtual Laboratory
Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Penguasaan
Konsep Siswa Di Sman 1 Lumajang. Jurnal Riset
Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), pp.5–16.
Sulistri, E. & Lisdawati, 2017. Using Three-Tier Test to
Identify the Quantity of Student that Having
Misconception on Newton’s Laws of Motion Concept.
JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 2(1), pp.4–6.
Sulistri, E., Sunyoto, N.E. & Sulhadi, 2016. The
Development of Set Activity Based Assessment (ABA)
to Measure Student Science Process Skill at Physics II.
In International Conference on Teacher Education And
Professional Development (INCoTEPD) 2016.
Yogyakarta State University, pp. 113–119.
Sumaji, 1998. Pendidikan Sains yang Humanistis,
Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Türker, F., 2005. Developing a three-tier test to assess high
school students’ misconceptions concerning force and
motion. Middle East Technical University, Ankara,
Turkey.
Wahyuni, R., Mariyam, M. & Sartika, D., 2018. Efektivitas
Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS)
Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis
Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus.
JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 3(1),
pp.26–31.
Correlation between Science Process Skills and the Comprehension of Physics Concept with Critical Thinking Skills on Newton’s Laws
47