3 DISCUSSION
Stomach is an organ that undergoes propulsion,
mixing of food, digestion and absorption of food
along with secretary functions. The parietal cells of
stomach secrete about 2500 mL of gastric juice
daily. The acid in this gastric juice kills many
bacteria and provide a low pH for pepsin to start
protein digestion. Mucosal erosions or ulcerations
take place when aggressive factors overwhelm the
defensive factors of the gastrointestinal mucosa. It
leads to the arrival of gastritis, peptic ulcer and
gastroesophageal reflux disease [8]. The aggressive
factors well established for several decades are acid
and pepsin. Hence peptic ulcer diseases are mostly
treated with antacids, H2 receptor antagonists and
proton pump inhibitors. Among them, antacids have
been widely used in the treatment of ulcer.
Antacids are generally inorganic salts which
dissolve in acid gastric secretions which release
anions that partially neutralize gastric hydrochloric
acid. They generally react chemically to neutralize
or buffer existing quantities of stomach acid but do
not have direct effect on its output. This action
results in increased pH value of stomach contents
and thus provide relief of hyperacidity symptoms.
These medications also reduce acid concentration
within the lumen of the esophagus which causes an
increase in intra-esophageal pH and a decrease in
pepsin activity [9]. These medicaments do not
decrease the volume of gastric secretions. Most of
the antacids available in the market are efficient but
is often unacceptable because of the common side
effects, especially altered bowel functions.
Antacids that contain aluminium contribute
aluminium to the diet but may cause constipation or
lead to phosphorous deficiency where as on long
term or inappropriate use can lead to aluminium
toxicity. Calcium containing antacids contribute
calcium to diet and may produce constipation.
Magnesium containing antacids contribute
magnesium to diet and produce a side effect of
diarrhea on prolonged use may even lead to
magnesium toxicity [10]. It is reported that SB
should be avoided even though it is a potent
neutralizer of acid as it contains significant amounts
of sodium and may alter the systemic pH. One major
fact that should be considered while selecting an
antacid for the treatment is its drug interactions.
Significant interactions occur with quinolone
antibiotics, tetracycline and iron sulphate [11].
Hence considering the side effects and drug
interactions of antacids, the herbal drugs having
fewer side effects should be identified as an
alternative for the treatment of peptic ulcers. It is
widely understood that herbal medicines have
recently generated an increased interest in the
treatment of gastritis. Hence in our present study we
had applied the titration method of Wu the modified
model of Vatier’s artificial stomach, which mimic
the regular physiological functioning of a human
stomach, to explore the antacid effects of clove
leaves that were well known for its potency to cure
all types of wounds.
Clove leaves ethanol extract syrup has antacid
and anti-flatulent activity. Eugenol inside this
formula was expected to have antacid and anti-
flatulent. It included in polyphenol group that has
pKa of 10.19, thus it was considered as a weak base.
So, it had the same mechanism of action as antacid
drugs which are also considered as weak base by
reacting with hydrochloric acid to form salts and
neutralize gastric acid. In comparison to negative
controls, Remington stated that if the pH has reached
2.3 then it has been able to neutralize gastric acid by
90% [12].
Anti-flatulent test was also performed in this
study due to the ability of high gastric acid to cause
flatulence. Thus, it can be concluded that good
antacids are the one that has high efficacy, few side
effects, and able to reduce bloating stomach.
REFERENCES
Holle GE. 2010. Pathophysiology and modern treatment
of ulcer disease. Int J Mol Med. 25: 483-491
Blume H, Donath F, Warnke A, Schug BS. 2006.
Pharmacokinetic drug interaction profiles of proton
pump inhibitors. Drug Saf. 29: 769–784
Okasha MAM, Abubakar MS, Fatihu MY, Magaji RA.
2007. Anti ulcerogenic and anti-secretory activity of
the n-butanol portion of Syzygium aromaticum in rat.
Nig Journ Pharm Sci. 6(2): 119–126.
Khanna D, Parle M. 2011. Clove: a champion spice.
International journal of research in ayurveda and
pharmacy. 2(1).
Oliveira, F. D. A., Andrade, L. N., Batista, E., Sousa, V.
De, dan Sousa, D. P. De., 2014. Anti-ulcer Activity of
Essential Oil Constituents. Molecules. pp. 5729.
Wind, Ajeng. 2014. Kitab Obat Tradisional Cina. Media
Pressindo: Yogyakarta.
Wu, T.H., Chen, I.C., Chen L.C., 2010. Antacid Effect of
Chinese Herbal Prescriptions Assesed by A Modified
Artificial Stomach Model. World Journal of
Gastroenterology, 16(35), pp. 4455-4459.
Katharinne I Moraes de Carvalho, Hélio B Fernandes,
Flávia D Frota Machado, Irisdalva S Oliveira,
Francisco A Oliveira, Paulo Humberto M Nunes,
2010. Antiulcer activity of ethanolic extract of
BROMO 2018 - Bromo Conference, Symposium on Natural Products and Biodiversity
4