2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Materials
E. longifolia sliced, dried roots were procured from
Malaysia, 99.5 % Methanol (Wako Pure Chemical
Industries, LTD, Lot: DSH3947), 99.9 % Methanol
(Wako Pure Chemical Industries, LTD, Lot:
DSJ0787), 99.7 % Methanol (Wako Pure Chemical
Industries, LTD, Lot: DSF3711), ethyl acetate
(Kanto Chemical Co. Inc. Lot: 51B1137), 99.0 % 1-
butanol (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, LTD, Lot:
DSR6754), 99.0 % Chloroform (Wako Pure
Chemical Industries, LTD, Lot: DSF3237), 99.8 %
Chloroform D + Silver Foil (Cambridge Isotope
Laboratories, Inc., Lot: PR-27572/04086CL1),
dimethyl sulfoxide, bovine serum albumin,
phosphate buffer solution, glucose, PBS containing
0.05% Tween 20, 0.5% gelatin in 100 mL coating
buffer, HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies,
1,2-phenyldiamine dihydrochloride, 100 µL of 1 M
sulfuric acid.
2.2 Apparatus
Evaporating flask, mantel heater, rotary evaporator
(EYELA NVC, No: 038006204), desiccator with
silica gel, TLC ODS plate, TLC silica gel plate. UV
light transmitter, microtube, micropipette, 96-well
plate, micro-ELISA plate reader, HPLC-RI detector
(Waters 600 Pump, Waters 600 Controller, Shodex
RI-201H Refractive Index Detector), MPLC Micro
pump KPW-20 (Kusano, Kagakukikai Co.),
Advantec Fraction Collector (CHF122SC), H-NMR
Varian (Agilent, 400 Hz), EI-MS (JEOL), HPLC
ODS-4151-N column (Senshu Pak, 10 x 150 mm,
No: 1110201H), MPLC column (MERCK,
LiChroprep Si 60 (40-63 µm), No: 540087666).
2.3 Preparation of Methanolic Extract
Methanolic extract of the roots of E. Longifolia (200
g) was obtained by extraction with MeOH (5.4 L)
three times under reflux for 3 hours. The solvent was
evaporated in vacuo to give MeOH extract (6.74 g).
2.4 Isolation of Components from
Methanolic Extract
The methanolic extract was suspended in water, then
extracted with EtOAc and n-BuOH, sequentially.
Each soluble portion was evaporated in vacuo to
give EtOAc (1.07 g) and n-BuOH (1.79 g) fractions,
respectively. The EtOAc fraction was
chromatographed on a prepacked silica gel column
(LiChroprep Si60 (40-63 µm) Merck Co. serial
number: 540087666, 140987) eluting with CHCl
3
to
give 15 fractions. Fr.8, Fr.9, and Fr.10 was further
purified with HPLC-RI (Detector: RI-201H,
SHODEX, Column: ODS-4151-N; size: 10 x 150
mm; number: 1110201H, Senshu Scientific Co. Ltd.)
detector. Fr.8 (0.0123 g) was further purified with
HPLC-RI detector using MeOH to provide four
fraction Fr.8-1 (0.0001 g) Fr.8-2 (0.0006 g) Fr.8-3
(0.0001 g) and Fr.8-4 (0.0001 g). Fr.9 (0.0148 g)
was further purified with MeOH-H
2
O mixture
(MeOH : H
2
O = 10 : 1) to gives four fraction Fr.9-1
(0.0014 g) Fr.9-2 (0.0010 g) Fr.9-3 (0.0014 g) and
Fr.9-4 (0.0007 g). Fr.10 (0.0074 g) was further
purified with MeOH-H
2
O mixture (MeOH : H
2
O =
10 : 1) to gives three fraction Fr.10-1 (0.0002 g)
Fr.10-2 (0.0003 g) Fr.10-3 (0.0001 g).
2.5 Inhibition Test on AGE Formation
in Vitro
BSA was incubated with 200 mmol/L glucose in
both presence and absence of test compound for 7
days in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 °C.
After incubation, coating buffer, blocking buffer and
anti-CML antibody were introduced to the cell.
HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies was
treated to the cells. 1 M sulfuric acid was used to
stop the reaction. The level of inhibition is measured
by calculating the level of CML measured by CML-
specific micro-ELISA plate reader at 492 nm
(SpectraMax PLUS 190PC ROM v1.23). Percentage
of inhibition was calculated as in following
equation:
Inhibition (%) = [1-(A
s
– A
b
)/(A
c
– A
b
)] x 100,
where A
s
is the CML level in the incubated mixture
with sample, A
c
is the CML level in the incubated
mixture without sample, and A
b
is the CML level in
the incubates mixture without sample and glucose
that served as blank control.
3 RESULTS
Methanolic extraction of E.longifolia root (200 g)
yielded 6.74 g of dried extract. Repeated extraction
under reflux ensures complete extraction from the
root. 20 mg of methanolic extract were subjected to
inhibition of AGEs formation in vitro by measuring
CML level using microELISA at 492 nm. Three
reading were recorded for each concentration. The
average reading is tabulated in Table 1.
BROMO 2018 - Bromo Conference, Symposium on Natural Products and Biodiversity
2