report in media is more balanced. This is because 
oftentimes, there is news that points the Muslim 
community as bad, such as the airing of the movie 
that paints Indonesian Muslim community as 
intolerant to other religious group and got a bad 
review and critics from Muslim clerics. 
The Ministry of Communication and Information 
Technology stated that the report to block the 
website came from BNPT and they only relay the 
report to the telecommunication providers to 
implement the blockade. The Ministry employs a 
system called Trust Positif that campaigns a healthy 
and safe internet surfing and lists website containing 
negative contents. 
The contents that are deemed as negative by the 
Ministry are pornographic content, racism, hate 
speech, violence, fraud, gambling, sites with 
malicious content, and copyright violation. Based on 
the theory stating that the government always tried 
to protect its citizen from ‘harmful knowledge’ in 
the media, the case of Voa-Islam.com blocking can 
be seen as protecting the citizen from radicalism 
content. In Canada, Australia, and Japan, the public 
news agency is controlled bystrict regulation and 
their work is supervised.  This concept goes along 
with the concept of tarikh. In making a regulation or 
Tanzhim, it is encouraged to refer to the phenomena, 
event, aspiration, theme, or issue that becomes a 
background for the regulation to be necessary. Also, 
in trying to understand the content of Al-Quran, we 
need to refer to Asbab al-Nuzul while to understand 
the Hadith, we need to refer to Asbab al-Wurud. The 
misunderstanding of the concept of Jihad came from 
the interpretation of Quran verses and Hadith in a 
rigid and literal way so that it deviates from the 
intended message taught by Islam. 
 
3. The Voa-Islam.com Blocking is a Violation of 
Human Rights and the Freedom of Speech.  
Voa-Islam.com blocking garnered protests and 
critics from many sides, including the Indonesian 
Ulama Council or Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) 
that regretted the action taken by the Ministry of 
Communication and Information Technology. This 
matter invites heavy reaction from the Muslim 
community because it is a sensitive issue. According 
to the Chairman of MUI, Zainut Tauhid, “This 
action could invite pros and cons opinion even 
though the reason behind it is to weed out radicalism 
and terrorism.” This is because the Ministry hasn’t 
released the explanation on what kind of criteria that 
they consider as radicalism.  
The action from BNPT and the Ministry in blocking 
Islamic websites invites many critics. One of them is 
from expert and lecturer of telecommunication, 
Onno W. Purbo. As an activist of open source, he 
valued the access for information as a part of human 
rights that is protected by the Universal Declaration 
of Human Rights (UDHR). This is a violation of 
human rights by the Ministry because they blocked 
some Islamic websites haphazardly without any 
explanation. Purbo questioned the definition of right 
from wrong, halal from haram, pornographic 
content, and terrorism that was referred by the 
government.  
In the era or globalization and information 
technology, Islamic da’wah channel faced a distinct 
challenge to run their mission using online media. 
On one hand, people sometimes misinterpret the 
website doing da’wah as malicious. On the other 
hand, the activity of da’wah needs certain creativity 
to adapt to this era. Science and technology can help 
the activity of da’wah to be more creative and 
interesting. However, the da’wah needs to come 
from a strong religious and empirical faith.  
A similar opinion was also voiced by Harits Abu 
Ulya, that the blocking of Islamic online media 
which is Voa-Islam.com violates human rights. Voa-
Islam.com is a media of da’wah to disseminate 
information about Islam. Voa-Islam.com blocking is 
counterproductive to the rights of the citizen to 
express their opinion or ideas. The government 
should give an open space for the citizen to enable 
civil control towards the media. The government 
was also seen as anti critics by limiting its citizen to 
their freedom of expression. This blockade reeks of 
political interest proven by the premature argument 
and showed the regime’s intellectual weakness to 
face alternative media that criticized their policy and 
can balance the report given by the mainstream 
media.   
Deregulation and Liberalization Theory gave 
space to public media, giving an impact on the 
‘loosening’ the regulation and ‘opening’ the media 
market. Thus, the regulation made shouldn’t restrain 
the society as long as they follow the existing rule. 
Regulation can be reevaluated as long as it is for the 
greater goodness of the nation.Freedom (Hurriyah) 
is a core part of human rights. The freedom here is 
not an absolute one, but a freedom with 
responsibility to Allah SWT toward the benefit of all 
people in the world. This is where regulation is 
needed to control the life.  
The Voa-Islam.com blocking case can be 
considered as a violation of freedom of speech 
guaranteed by the constitution and human rights on 
one side. But on the other side, the government has 
an authority to control and implement the regulation. 
Then, the communication between the admin of