Comparing and Contrasting Expressions of Asking Opinions
Rika Mutiara
1
, Prayogo Hadi Sulistio
1
, Nuryansyah Adijaya
1
and Ratnawati Susanto
1
1
English Department, Esa Ungggul University, Jl. Arjuna Utara No. 9, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Corpus, Phraseology, and Learning Materials
Abstract: This study aims at comparing and contrasting expressions of asking opinions in the textbook and corpora. It,
moreover, gives a suggestion which expressions could be given for English learning purposes based on the
findings in the corpora. Corpus-assisted discourse study was used as the method. The corpora used in this
study are COCA, BYU-BNC, SOAP, and Strathy. The frequency, positions, and characteristics of dialogues
in which the expressions occur are the focus of the investigation. Some expressions for instance what is
your point of view about… never occur in the corpora. The textbook only presented the expressions to
occur in initial positions. However, other positions also can be found in the corpora. Based on the corpus
finding, the interlocutors tend to find more information related to the topics, extend the topics, and make
comparison when they ask opinions. Other expressions such as do you have an opinion and in your
opinion were possible to use based on the findings in the corpora.
1 INTRODUCTION
Learning a foreign language is a complex process
that depends on several aspects such as learning
activities and materials. When it is conducted in a
formal education such as in higher education, most
activities are designed to be conducted in the
classroom. A learning material was also provided by
a course developer. Tomlinson (2011) gave a
definition of learning material as follows: “it can be
linguistic, visual, auditory, or kinesthetic and they
can be represented in print through live
performance, or display, or a cassette, CD-ROM,
DVD, or the internet.” A textbook is commonly used
as the source of learning in which the foreign
language learners get input of the target language. A
textbook provides texts in which the students can
observe vocabulary, phrases, text structures, and
sociolinguistic aspects of the target language. It
provides both spoken and written language input.
This study focuses on conversations in the textbook
used in a university. As conversations belong to
spoken language use, the language used in the
conversations is expected to represent the
characteristics of spoken language.
Learning materials in the textbook are designed
for language learning. The language can be different
from the language used in real conversation.
Studying the language in the textbook could be
conducted by comparing and contrasting the
language in the textbook with the ones in the
corpus/corpora. Corpus is a group of texts that are
compiled and saved using an electronic device
(Conrad, 2005). Corpus can be general or specific.
The general corpus contains language in various
registers such as in Corpus of Contemporary
American English (COCA). COCA has spoken,
fiction, magazine, newspaper, and academic
registers. The language of the specific corpus is only
in one particular register such as in SOAP corpus
which covers language of soap operas. The language
variation in the corpus might consist only in one
specific variety. For instance, COCA has American
English,and BYU-BNC (Brigham Young University
British National Corpus) has British English.
The language of the corpora mentioned above is
authentic language in which language users use it for
communicative functions. Using authentic texts in
selecting materials will give input that is appropriate
for the students when they use language for
communication (Gottheim, 2010). Therefore, the
purpose of corpus study in language learning is to
see whether the language in the textbook is natural
or unnatural. Based on the corpus findings, learning
materials developer get suggestion what should be
given or not (Walsh, 2010).
2858
Mutiara, R., Hadi Sulistio, P., Adijaya, N. and Susanto, R.
Comparing and Contrasting Expressions of Asking Opinions.
DOI: 10.5220/0009953728582864
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations (ICRI 2018), pages 2858-2864
ISBN: 978-989-758-458-9
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Some elements that might be the focus of a corpus
study are words or phrases. The frequency of a word
in the textbook and corpus can be studied to see
whether the words are commonly used. It might also
be used to find the words that become the main
features in a register. Counting the word frequency
in a specific register also gives pictures which words
are important to be learnt by the students.
Some words tend to co-occur with other words.
Such kinds of words are called collocations.
Collocations of the words tend to be investigated
especially the ones in learners’ writing and corpus.
The use of appropriate collocations makes learners’
writing sounds natural. For instance, to describe
applying research, word research can be used with
conduct. It forms the collocation conduct research.
Words that become the members of collocations
might occur in sequence or another element might
occur between them. The span is four or five words
to the left or right. Sometimes, the learners do the
translation when dealing with collocations. They
translated the phrases word by word in their mother
tongue into the target language. It might result in
unnatural language.
Investigating collocations might reveal the
characteristics of language function in conversation.
Studying collocations of disagreeing shows that the
speakers tend to have respected and give reasons in
giving disagreement (Mutiara, 2017). These two
functions are related to maintaining the
relationshipbetween the speakers and the
interlocutors. This finding can be accommodated
when developing the syllabus and learning materials.
By doing so, the learners are exposed to the nature
of disagreement in real life. They become to realize
that language is not only structures but also social
functions.
Phrases are also investigated in the corpus. Some
phrases are formed by definite words,and it was
realized as a unit. According to Gläser (1998), it is
“a phraseological unit is a lexicalized, reproducible
bilexemic or polylexemic word group in common
use, which has relative syntactic and semantic
stability.” Therefore, such phrases have forms like a
sentence that carry language functions. They have
essential roles in texts (Biber and Conrad, 1999).
They can consist of three, four, or five words. For
example, do you agree with me is a phrase consists
of 5 words and I strongly disagree is a phrase that
consists of 3 words.
Those phrases occur in the textbooks as language
models. They are labeled as expressions, for
instance, expressions of giving agreement,
requesting, asking opinions, etc. Expressions in the
textbook can be compared and contrasted to the ones
from the corpora. Sznajder (2010) studied words
and phrases that carry metaphoric meanings. It was
found that almost a third of the words and phrases in
the textbook do not occur in the corpus. In another
case, Seto (2009) examined expressions of
agreement in 5 textbooks and corpus. He focused on
similarities and differences among them. Out of 54
expressions, there is 7 percent of expressions that
can be found in the corpus. Furthermore, the
expressions in the textbook tend to appear as a long
phrase while the ones in the corpus are in the forms
of one-word expressions.
For comparing and contrasting language
elements, the corpus must be selected carefully.
Some corpora cover both spoken and written
languages while the others only include one of them.
For the corpus study, the similar characteristic of the
language in the textbook and corpus is necessary.
For instance, when studying phrases in the spoken
language, the language in the corpus is the spoken
language. Thus, a balanced comparison can be
established. This study focuses on phrases that are
used to ask opinions in spoken language.
Asking opinions is one of the expressions in the
textbook. In interaction, asking opinions is a way to
give an opportunity for the interlocutors to speak up
their mind. Two ways interactions are developed in
such a way. In a conversation, they give equal
position both for the listeners and speakers in the
dialogues. To accommodate this issue, it is
necessary to examine the characteristics of dialogues
in which asking opinions occur. It deals with what
other language functions that the speakers produce
when they ask opinions. Having information about it
will be an advantage for developing the learning
materials. Dialogues constructed in the textbook will
have the same characteristics as the ones in the
corpus. Besides, finding other possible expressions
of asking opinions is necessary to provide more
various expressions to enrich language input for the
learners.
Based on the discussion above, the study sought
to answer some questions as can be seen below. Do
expressions of asking opinions in the textbook occur
in the corpora? How are the positions of the
expressions in the textbook compared to the ones in
the corpora? How are the characteristics of the
dialogues in which the expressions of asking
opinions occur? What are possible expressions to
ask opinions based on the findings in the corpora?
Comparing and Contrasting Expressions of Asking Opinions
2859
3 RESEARCH METHOD
In this study, analyzing texts is conducted through
corpus-assisted discourse study. Corpus linguistics,
thus, is applied to study discourse. The focus of
corpus linguistics is finding the frequency of the
words/phrases, analyzing the concordance lines, and
finding any other patterns of the words/phrases such
as collocations and n-grams (Romero-Trillo, 2013).
The data was taken from COCA (Corpus of
Contemporary American English), BYU-BNC
(Brigham Young University-British National
Corpus), SOAP, Strathy, and HKCSE (Hong Kong
Corpus of Spoken English). COCA, BYU-BNC and
Strathy have spoken and written language sections.
In comparing and contrasting language to those
corpora, the written language was excluded. The
expressions from the textbook exist in the context of
spoken language.
The data were gathered by listing all of the
expressions in the textbook and the corpora. Then,
those expressions were checked in the corpora. The
findings from the corpora were then analyzed to see
the occurrences, positions, and language functions
that tend to co-occur with expressions of asking
opinions. The categorization of position is divided
into two namely initial and non-initial positions.
Initial means it is located in the first part of the
utterances such as in what do you think, guys? While
in non-initial, the expression is not the first words
uttered. For instance, in if so, what do you think,
guys? The expression of asking opinion occupies the
non-initial position. Besides, by using words namely
opinion and think, other expressions that were
possible to be used in asking opinions were used.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
There are some differences of expressions in the
textbook and corpora. Several expressions were not
found in several corpora. For the positions of the
expressions, several expressions occur in initial and
non-initial positions. Some others can be found only
in one of the positions. Finding any other relevant
information from the interlocutors, extending the
topics, and comparing can be found when the
speakers ask opinions. Furthermore, there are some
possible expressions of asking opinions in the
corpora.
4.1 The Occurrences of Expressions of
Asking Opinions
There are six expressions in the textbook that were
checked in the corpora. What is your point of view
about…andwhat is your comment about never
occur in the corpora. As far as you know, what
occurs one in BYU-BNC. The frequency of what
can you say about in the corpora is as follows: 23
(COCA), 1 (BNC), 4 (SOAP). While the frequency
of what do you think about is as follows: 1,517
(COCA), 38 (BNC), 606 (SOAP), and 11(Strathy).
The occurrence of what is your opinion about was
only found in COCA. It occurs for 4 times. The
frequency of as far as you know, what was only
found in BYU-BNC. It occurs only in a single
occurrence. What is your point of view about…and
what is your comment about were not found in all
corpora. Based on the findings in the corpora, it can
be said that what do you think about…and what can
you say about ? are the common expressions in
real life.
All the expressions in the textbook occur with
preposition about. I suggested that the occurrences
of prepositions in the expressions made the
frequencies lower. I, thus, removed the prepositions
from the expressions. The findings show that the
frequencies of the shorter expressions are higher.
The frequencies of what do you think are as
follows: 10,397 (COCA), 506 (BYU-BNC), 11,025
(SOAP), and 86 (Strathy). What can you say also
can be found in all corpora with the frequencies as
follows: 101 (COCA), 6 (BYU-BNC), 21 (SOAP),
and 1 (Strathy). What is your comment now occurs
in three corpora as follows: 11 (COCA), 1 (SOAP),
and 2 (Strathy). What is your opinion appears in two
corpora as follows: 38 (COCA) and 5 (SOAP). What
is your point of view occurs only once in
BYUBNC. It can be concluded that the existence of
the prepositions limit the frequencies of the
expressions. In the real use of language, the use of
the expressions without prepositions is more
common.
4.2 The Positions of Expressions of
Asking Opinions
For the next investigation, the expressions of giving
opinions without prepositions were used in the
query. In the textbook, all expressions occur in the
initial position. Among six expressions, five
expressions begin with question words what.
However, the findings from the corpus show that it
is possible for the expressions to occur in non-initial
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
2860
position. Table 1 until Table 6 shows all possible
positions were reported.
What is your opinion occupies two possible
positions.
Table 1: The positions of what is your opinion
Corpus
Initial
Non-initial
COCA
BYU-BNC
SOAP
Strathy
What do you think also occurs in initial and non-
initial.
Table 2: The positions of what do you think
Corpus
Initial
Non-initial
COCA
BYU-BNC
SOAP
Strathy
What is your point of view only occurs in non- initial
position.
Table 3: The positions of what is your point of view
Corpus
Initial
Non-initial
COCA
BYU-BNC
SOAP
Strathy
What can you say occurs in both positions in COCA,
BYU-BNC, and SOAP. However, it only occupies
initial position in Strathy.
Table 4: The positions of what can you say
Corpus
Initial
Non-initial
COCA
BYU-BNC
SOAP
Strathy
What is your comment occurs in both positions in
COCA and Strathy but it was only found in initial
position in SOAP.
Table 5: The positions of what is your comment
Corpus
Initial
Non-initial
COCA
BYU-BNC
SOAP
Strathy
As far as you knowwas found only in BYU-BNC in
non-initial position.
Table 6: The positions of as far as you know, what
Initial
Non-initial
In the case of the expressions that only have one
occurrence such as what is your point of view and
what can you say , they are in non-initial
positions. The other expression that has one
occurrence is what is your comment in SOAP. It
is in initial position.
When it does not occur in initial position, some
conjunctions such as so and but exist in the
beginning of the utterances such as in the examples
below.
So what do you think about that? (BYU-BNC) So,
what do you think the Board should do with that
kind of information? (Strathy)
But what can you say? (COCA)
A clause such as I mean might occur in the
beginning of the utterance.
I mean, what can you say? You know, you messed
up. (SOAP)
Also, names of the interlocutors might appear at the
beginning of the utterances such as in the following
example.
Ms Schwartz, what is your comment on the solutions
you have heard from the experts and the policy
makers? (COCA)
4.3 The Characteristics of the
Conversation
To find the characteristics of a dialogue of asking
opinions, the collocations of what do you think and
what can you saywere obtained. These two
Comparing and Contrasting Expressions of Asking Opinions
2861
expressions are the commonest expressions
compared to other expressions. What do you think
were investigated in all corpora while what can you
say were searched only in COCA due to its low
frequencies in the other corpora. Table 7 until Table
9 shows information about the collocates and their
frequencies of what do you think.
Table 7: Left collocates of what do you think
Corpus
Collocate
(frequency)
COCA
so (345)
and (292) but
(151)
BNC
well (22)
and (10)
said (6)
but (6)
SOAP
so (917)
and (169) but
(58)
now (25) just
(19) then
(17)
Strathy
and (4)
or (3)
so (3)
Right collocates of what do you think are
prepositions as can be seen in the table below.
Table 8: Right collocates of what do you think
Corpus
Collocate
(frequency)
COCA
of (1,900)
about (1,697)
that (1,356)
is (1,151)
to (712)
this (665)
BNC
of (114)
that (57) about
(47)
SOAP
that (825)
about (797) doing
(794)
is (692) to
(670)
Strathy
about (13) of
(11)
The following table shows collocates to the left and
right of what can you say in COCA.
Table 9: Left and right collocates of what can you say
Left collocate
Right collocate
but (6)
to (34)
about (25) that
(12)
Based on the collocations, three characteristics
that can be found in which the expressions of asking
opinions occur are finding more information from
the interlocutors, extending the topic, and
comparing. Those characteristics cannot be seen in
the dialogues of asking opinions in the textbook. In
the textbook, asking opinions is a single language
function in the dialogue.
Speakers might ask two questions in an
utterance. Therefore, conjunction and was used to
add another question.
A: Was it a painful decision for you? And what do
you think looking at JetBlue now? B: Well, it was
extremely painful. (COCA).
Another example shows the speakers used various
question words.
A: How did you learn the news and what do you
think?
B: I first heard the news, I had heard about the… .
(COCA)
Asking opinions might occur with another question.
Giving two questions in one utterance means that
the speakers tried to find as much information as
possible from the interlocutors. While discussing an
issue, the speaker did not only care of the speakers
opinion about the issue but also he focused on other
information related to it. In the utterance how did
you learn the news and what do you think?,the
speaker was curious to know about how the
interlocutor learn the news.
Furthermore, the speakers tend to extend the
conversation by using conjunction so. Before asking
opinions, the speaker asked another question. Based
on the answer to that question, the speaker asked a
related issue.
A: This your first child?
B: Yeah.
A: So what do you think of motherhood?
B: I love it. (COCA)
After the speaker got information that the speaker
has a child, he connected this information with
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
2862
another issue that is motherhood. The speaker built
coherence in the dialogue.
In another example, the speaker talked about
eating. Then, he continued with asking speaker’s
opinion about breakfast bar.
A: Eat your dinner. So what do you think of my
breakfast bar then Sue? B: It'svery good. (BNC)
In another case, speaker A mentioned about
setting up a date. Next, speaker B asked an opinion
about Christmas. She connected the information
given by A to extend the topic.
A: And we have already set a date.
B: So what do you think about Christmas?
C: Yay!
B: Oh, she likes it. (SOAP)
In the dialogue below, speaker A stated his
judgment toward a group of people. Speaker B
realized that A has a positive attitude. He, then,
continued to extend the topic by asking an opinion
of hanging out with them.
A: They're great.
B: So what do you think about hanging out with
them more on a permanent basis? (SOAP)
The other language function is to compare.
Speaker A mentioned an issue about tulip then he
compared tulip with roses in the form of asking an
opinion.
A: You know, tulips will not work, but what do you
think about roses -- red ones -- for the church?
B: Yeah. (SOAP)
Speaker A stated speaker’s B attitude towards
George Bush. Then, he compared it with Pat
Buchanan and asked speaker’s B opinion towards
Buchanan.
A: You'restrongly supporting George W. Bush for
president, but what is your opinion of Pat
Buchanan?
B: I think Pat Buchanan has strayed … . (COCA)
In the other case, speaker A mentioned the fact
that the report is still being done. Then, he asked an
interlocutor’s opinion.
A: I know the report is still classified, but what can
you say about it? (COCA)
It can be said asking opinions tend to occur in a
discourse frame of comparing two issues.
4.4 Other Possible Expressions of
Asking Opinions
Other three possible opinions of asking opinions
were found in the corpora. They used various
question words as in how do you feel ?; in your
opinion, what …?; and do you have an opinion ?.
Based on the analysis of the concordance lines, not
all occurrences of how do you feel means to ask
opinions. When it functions to ask opinions, it can
be seen as in the example below.
A: When someone says ghetto, how do you feel
about that?
B: I feel like they should be more careful in their
choice. (COCA)
In the example above how do you feelwas answered
with the phrase I feel . However, it can be
omitted. Therefore, the speaker mentioned directly
his opinion as can be seen in the examples below.
A: How do you feel about the accident?
B: Awful. I'd like the law changed. (BYU-BNC)
Like the examples taken from COCA and BYU-
BNC, an example from SOAP shows that
prepositionabout collocates with how do you feel.
A: How do you feel about London?
B: It'smy new second favorite city. (SOAP)
In your opinion, occurs with several question
words but most of them are what. It might occur in
the initial position.
In your opinion, Chief, what mindset do you have to
have when you're in the … ? (Strathy)
The addressee term such as chief might appear as in
the example above. In addition, the clause with
question word might occur first. Then, it is followed
by in your opinion.
What is the lure of that in your opinion? (COCA).
It is possible for in your opinion to be inserted in the
clause structure. The questions occur with auxiliary
verbs namely did.
Comparing and Contrasting Expressions of Asking Opinions
2863
Did he, in your opinion, accomplish what he set out
to do to fuse politics and pop culture? (COCA)
Do you have an opinion could be applied to ask
one’s opinions.
A: Do you have an opinion?!
B: No. !
A: Youdon't?
When the speakers used do you have an opinion, the
interlocutor might give more than just yes or no
answers.
A: What about you, do you have an opinion?
B: I think you need to give Robin some room.
(SOAP)
It occurs with another expression of asking opinion
(what about you?). Moreover, using do you have an
opinion seems that the speakers do not demand the
interlocutors to give opinions. When they do not
have opinions, they might easily say no.
Those three expressions are possible to be
included in the textbook to enrich the learning
materials. For in your opinion, it might be possible
for the learning materials to include all the possible
structures. By doing so, it makes the students get
various models of language use.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Several expressions of asking opinions in the
textbook have low frequencies in the corpora. It
suggests that they are not common expressions in
daily life. The occurrence of preposition about in the
expressions in the textbook limits the occurrences of
the expressions when the expressions were checked
in the corpora. Based on the findings in the corpora,
preposition of also occurs with an expression of
asking opinions. In addition, that clause is also
possible to occur with the expressions.
Positions of the expressions in the textbook are
always in initial positions. However, corpus findings
show various positions are possible. Based on the
concordance lines analysis, finding more
information, extending the topic, and comparing
exist in dialogues in which the speakers ask
opinions. It would be better if the dialogues in the
textbook are developed by considering these
characteristics. Other possible expressions are how
do you feel …, in your opinion …, and do you have
an opinion …?. They can be presented in the
textbook to provide various models. Further research
can be conducted to develop learning materials
based on the findings.
REFERENCES
Biber, D., and Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical bundles in
conversation and academic prose. Language and
Computers, 26: 181-190.
Conrad, S. (2005). Corpus linguistics and L2 teaching.
Handbook of research in second language teaching
and learning, 1.
Gläser, R. (1998). The stylistic potential of phraseological
units in the light of genre analysis. Phraseology:
Theory, analysis, and applications, pp. 125-143.
Gottheim, L. (2010). Composing textbooks as a non-
expert. Research for materials development in
language learning, pp. 224-236.
Mutiara, R. (2017). Expressions of disagreement in the
textbook and corpora. In S. Triyono (Ed.), Literacy in
linguistics and language education. Proceedings of the
2nd International Conference on Linguistics and
Language Teaching, pp. 144-149.
Romero-Trillo, J. (2013). Yearbook of corpus linguistics
and pragmatics 2013. Dordrecht: Springer.
Seto, A. (2009). ‘I Agree with You’–A Corpus-based
Study Of Agreement. 3L: Language, Linguistics,
Literature®, 15.
Sznajder, H. S. (2010). A corpus-based evaluation of
metaphors in a business English textbook. English for
Specific Purposes, 29(1): 30-42.
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2011). Materials development in
language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Walsh, S. (2010). What features of spoken and written
corpora can be exploited in creating language teaching
materials and syllabuses. The Routledge handbook of
corpus linguistics, pp. 333-344.
ICRI 2018 - International Conference Recent Innovation
2864